{"title":"倒班护士睡眠功能失调信念量表的编制。","authors":"Jaeeun Song, Zehra Tugcehan Duman, Sooyeon Suh, Seockhoon Chung","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2512135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to develop a sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs scale that can be applied specifically to shift workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep for shift Workers scale (DBSW) was developed under the standard rating scale development process. We conducted two online surveys to run an exploratory factor analysis (EFA, Study I, <i>N</i> = 323) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, Study II, <i>N</i> = 300) for the new scale. The convergent validity of the DBSW was explored with pre-existing rating scales, including the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 scale (DBAS-16), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We finally selected 10 items after EFA, and we observed that the scale has three factors. Based on the CFA, the three-factor model with a 10-item DBSW showed good fits for the model (CFI = 0.971, TLI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.042). The internal consistency of reliability of the DBSW were excellent based on the McDonald's omega value of 0.802. Convergent validity analyses revealed significant correlations between the total DBSW score and ISI (<i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.01), DBAS-16 (<i>r</i> = 0.74, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and GSES (<i>r</i> = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Three factors (Dysfunctional beliefs, Control, and Shift work) of the DBSW were correlated with each other: total score of DBSW, ISI, DBAS-16, and GSES scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DBSW is a rating scale that can measure sleep-related cognition specific to shift workers with good reliability and validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2037-2048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep for shift Workers scale (DBSW) for shift-working registered nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Jaeeun Song, Zehra Tugcehan Duman, Sooyeon Suh, Seockhoon Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2512135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to develop a sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs scale that can be applied specifically to shift workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep for shift Workers scale (DBSW) was developed under the standard rating scale development process. We conducted two online surveys to run an exploratory factor analysis (EFA, Study I, <i>N</i> = 323) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, Study II, <i>N</i> = 300) for the new scale. The convergent validity of the DBSW was explored with pre-existing rating scales, including the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 scale (DBAS-16), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We finally selected 10 items after EFA, and we observed that the scale has three factors. Based on the CFA, the three-factor model with a 10-item DBSW showed good fits for the model (CFI = 0.971, TLI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.042). The internal consistency of reliability of the DBSW were excellent based on the McDonald's omega value of 0.802. Convergent validity analyses revealed significant correlations between the total DBSW score and ISI (<i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.01), DBAS-16 (<i>r</i> = 0.74, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and GSES (<i>r</i> = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Three factors (Dysfunctional beliefs, Control, and Shift work) of the DBSW were correlated with each other: total score of DBSW, ISI, DBAS-16, and GSES scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DBSW is a rating scale that can measure sleep-related cognition specific to shift workers with good reliability and validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2037-2048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2512135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2512135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言：我们的目的是开发一个睡眠相关的功能失调信念量表，可以专门应用于轮班工人。方法：按照标准评定量表的编制流程编制《倒班工作者睡眠功能失调信念量表》。我们进行了两次在线调查，对新量表进行了探索性因素分析（EFA，研究I， N = 323）和验证性因素分析（CFA，研究II， N = 300）。采用已有的睡眠功能失调信念与态度量表（DBAS-16）、失眠严重程度指数（ISI）和格拉斯哥睡眠努力量表（GSES）来研究DBSW的收敛效度。结果：经EFA后，我们最终选择了10个项目，我们观察到量表有三个因素。基于CFA的三因素模型与10项DBSW模型拟合良好（CFI = 0.971, TLI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.042）。基于麦当劳ω值0.802，DBSW的信度内部一致性较好。结果表明，DBSW总分与ISI呈显著相关（r = 0.54, p r = 0.74, p r = 0.48, p）。结论：DBSW量表是一种能够测量轮班工人睡眠相关认知的量表，具有良好的信效度。
Development of the Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep for shift Workers scale (DBSW) for shift-working registered nurses.
Introduction: We aimed to develop a sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs scale that can be applied specifically to shift workers.
Methods: The Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep for shift Workers scale (DBSW) was developed under the standard rating scale development process. We conducted two online surveys to run an exploratory factor analysis (EFA, Study I, N = 323) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, Study II, N = 300) for the new scale. The convergent validity of the DBSW was explored with pre-existing rating scales, including the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 scale (DBAS-16), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES).
Results: We finally selected 10 items after EFA, and we observed that the scale has three factors. Based on the CFA, the three-factor model with a 10-item DBSW showed good fits for the model (CFI = 0.971, TLI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.042). The internal consistency of reliability of the DBSW were excellent based on the McDonald's omega value of 0.802. Convergent validity analyses revealed significant correlations between the total DBSW score and ISI (r = 0.54, p < 0.01), DBAS-16 (r = 0.74, p < 0.01), and GSES (r = 0.48, p < 0.01). Three factors (Dysfunctional beliefs, Control, and Shift work) of the DBSW were correlated with each other: total score of DBSW, ISI, DBAS-16, and GSES scores.
Conclusions: The DBSW is a rating scale that can measure sleep-related cognition specific to shift workers with good reliability and validity.
期刊介绍：
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
