COVID-19大流行期间静脉-静脉体外膜氧合幸存者的功能结局:一项历史队列研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Eunicia Ursu, Ana Mikolić, Bobo Tong, Noah D Silverberg, Nishtha Parag, Denise Foster, Mypinder S Sekhon, William Panenka, Sonny Thiara, Donald E G Griesdale
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间静脉-静脉体外膜氧合幸存者的功能结局:一项历史队列研究","authors":"Eunicia Ursu, Ana Mikolić, Bobo Tong, Noah D Silverberg, Nishtha Parag, Denise Foster, Mypinder S Sekhon, William Panenka, Sonny Thiara, Donald E G Griesdale","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02965-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients with respiratory failure. The goal of this study was to characterize postdischarge psychological and functional outcomes of this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a historical cohort study of survivors who required VV-ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using telephone interviews, we assessed the following domains: disability (using the World Health Organization Disability Schedule [WHODAS 2.0] and modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), health-related quality of life (using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level tool), cognition (using the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool), depression (using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (using the Impact of Event Scale-6). We used descriptive statistics to analyze our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six participants with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 47 [42-59] yr and 6 (23%) of whom were female were evaluated at a median [IQR] of 22 [17-23] months after ECMO separation. Twenty-two (85%) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. The median [IQR] WHODAS 2.0 score was 26 [15-30] with the highest degree of disability in the mobility and participation domains. Of the 24 participants who were employed full-time, 12 (50%) were able to work in the same capacity. Of the 25 respondents who were living independently at baseline, 22 (88%) maintained complete independence for their activities of daily living (mRS < 3), one (4%) described persistent functional limitations (mRS = 3), and two (8%) required constant care (mRS = 4 or 5). Thirteen (52%) and nine (38%) reported at least moderate pain or anxiety, respectively. Ten (40%) and seven (28%) participants screened positive for symptoms of depression or posttraumatic stress disorder, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who required VV-ECMO experienced significant functional disability, pain, cognitive challenges, mental health problems, and lower quality of life approximately two years after discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional outcomes among the survivors of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a historical cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Eunicia Ursu, Ana Mikolić, Bobo Tong, Noah D Silverberg, Nishtha Parag, Denise Foster, Mypinder S Sekhon, William Panenka, Sonny Thiara, Donald E G Griesdale\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-025-02965-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients with respiratory failure. The goal of this study was to characterize postdischarge psychological and functional outcomes of this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a historical cohort study of survivors who required VV-ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using telephone interviews, we assessed the following domains: disability (using the World Health Organization Disability Schedule [WHODAS 2.0] and modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), health-related quality of life (using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level tool), cognition (using the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool), depression (using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (using the Impact of Event Scale-6). We used descriptive statistics to analyze our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six participants with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 47 [42-59] yr and 6 (23%) of whom were female were evaluated at a median [IQR] of 22 [17-23] months after ECMO separation. Twenty-two (85%) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. The median [IQR] WHODAS 2.0 score was 26 [15-30] with the highest degree of disability in the mobility and participation domains. Of the 24 participants who were employed full-time, 12 (50%) were able to work in the same capacity. Of the 25 respondents who were living independently at baseline, 22 (88%) maintained complete independence for their activities of daily living (mRS < 3), one (4%) described persistent functional limitations (mRS = 3), and two (8%) required constant care (mRS = 4 or 5). Thirteen (52%) and nine (38%) reported at least moderate pain or anxiety, respectively. Ten (40%) and seven (28%) participants screened positive for symptoms of depression or posttraumatic stress disorder, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who required VV-ECMO experienced significant functional disability, pain, cognitive challenges, mental health problems, and lower quality of life approximately two years after discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02965-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02965-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)越来越多地应用于呼吸衰竭患者。本研究的目的是表征该患者群体的出院后心理和功能结果。方法:我们对COVID-19大流行期间需要VV-ECMO的幸存者进行了一项历史队列研究。通过电话访谈,我们评估了以下领域:残疾(使用世界卫生组织残疾表[WHODAS 2.0]和修改后的兰金量表[mRS])、健康相关的生活质量(使用欧洲生活质量5维度5水平工具)、认知(使用电话蒙特利尔认知评估工具)、抑郁(使用患者健康问卷-9)和创伤后应激障碍症状(使用事件影响量表-6)。我们用描述性统计来分析我们的结果。结果:26名参与者的中位[四分位间距(IQR)]年龄为47[42-59]岁,其中6名(23%)为女性,在ECMO分离后的中位[IQR]为22[17-23]个月。22人(85%)被诊断为COVID-19。WHODAS 2.0评分中位数[IQR]为26[15-30],在活动和参与领域残疾程度最高。在24名全职工作的参与者中,有12人(50%)能够以相同的身份工作。在基线独立生活的25名受访者中,22名(88%)在日常生活活动中保持完全独立(mRS)结论:需要VV-ECMO的患者在出院后大约两年后出现了明显的功能障碍、疼痛、认知挑战、精神健康问题和较低的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional outcomes among the survivors of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a historical cohort study.

Purpose: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients with respiratory failure. The goal of this study was to characterize postdischarge psychological and functional outcomes of this patient population.

Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study of survivors who required VV-ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using telephone interviews, we assessed the following domains: disability (using the World Health Organization Disability Schedule [WHODAS 2.0] and modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), health-related quality of life (using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level tool), cognition (using the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool), depression (using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (using the Impact of Event Scale-6). We used descriptive statistics to analyze our results.

Results: Twenty-six participants with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 47 [42-59] yr and 6 (23%) of whom were female were evaluated at a median [IQR] of 22 [17-23] months after ECMO separation. Twenty-two (85%) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. The median [IQR] WHODAS 2.0 score was 26 [15-30] with the highest degree of disability in the mobility and participation domains. Of the 24 participants who were employed full-time, 12 (50%) were able to work in the same capacity. Of the 25 respondents who were living independently at baseline, 22 (88%) maintained complete independence for their activities of daily living (mRS < 3), one (4%) described persistent functional limitations (mRS = 3), and two (8%) required constant care (mRS = 4 or 5). Thirteen (52%) and nine (38%) reported at least moderate pain or anxiety, respectively. Ten (40%) and seven (28%) participants screened positive for symptoms of depression or posttraumatic stress disorder, respectively.

Conclusions: Patients who required VV-ECMO experienced significant functional disability, pain, cognitive challenges, mental health problems, and lower quality of life approximately two years after discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信