评估间质性肺疾病的肺功能和严重程度分级(预测百分比与z评分)及其与生存的关系:一项6808例患者的回顾性队列研究

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-29 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004619
Piotr W Boros, Magdalena M Martusewicz-Boros, Katarzyna B Lewandowska
{"title":"评估间质性肺疾病的肺功能和严重程度分级(预测百分比与z评分)及其与生存的关系:一项6808例患者的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Piotr W Boros, Magdalena M Martusewicz-Boros, Katarzyna B Lewandowska","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are essential for predicting outcomes in interstitial lung disease (ILD). In 2022, an expert panel recommended using z-scores instead of the traditional % predicted cut-off values to interpret the severity of PFT abnormalities which may lead to discordant classifications in some patients. To assess the magnitude and prognostic impact of this phenomenon we compared these two approaches in predicting all-cause mortality in a large cohort of patients with ILDs.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from a tertiary referral center for patients with ILDs. Absolute FEV1, FVC, TLC, and TLCO values from patients' first presentations were transformed and presented as % predicted and z-scores using the most recent global lung initiative (GLI) reference values. Results were categorized for severity according to % predicted and z-score levels. Predictors of all-cause mortality over a 14-year follow-up were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Between January 2009 and March 2023, 6,808 patients with ILDs were evaluated at the National TB and Lung Diseases Research Institute in Warsaw, Poland. Most were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, fibrotic ILD, or non-fibrotic ILD. At their first presentation, 13.2% had airway obstruction, 23.1% had low FVC (indicative of restriction by spirometry), and 45.6% had a reduced lung transfer factor (TLCO). Reclassification of spirometric indices occurred in 26.8% of patients for FEV1 and 24.6% for FVC among those with abnormal results, with most being reassigned to a less severe categories. For TLCO, 28.1% of patients with reduced values were reclassified, with most shifting to more severe categories. During the follow-up, 1,525 (22.4%) of patients died. Both low FVC and low TLCO predicted all-cause mortality, with z-score thresholds showing stronger associations with mortality. A one-unit decrease in the FVC z-score was associated with a 10.3% increase in the risk of death, while a one-unit decrease in TLCO z-score was linked to an over 30% increase in mortality risk. Limitations of this retrospective single-center study include lack of data on cause-specific mortality, potential residual confounding, and limited generalizability to non-Caucasian or younger populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recently recommended use of z-scores leads to significant reclassification of lung function results in patients with ILDs, largely driven by age. This approach is justified by its stronger prognostic associations. Severe TLCO impairment remains a robust predictor of mortality in ILDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 5","pages":"e1004619"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of lung function and severity grading in interstitial lung diseases (% predicted versus z-scores) and association with survival: A retrospective cohort study of 6,808 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr W Boros, Magdalena M Martusewicz-Boros, Katarzyna B Lewandowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are essential for predicting outcomes in interstitial lung disease (ILD). In 2022, an expert panel recommended using z-scores instead of the traditional % predicted cut-off values to interpret the severity of PFT abnormalities which may lead to discordant classifications in some patients. To assess the magnitude and prognostic impact of this phenomenon we compared these two approaches in predicting all-cause mortality in a large cohort of patients with ILDs.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from a tertiary referral center for patients with ILDs. Absolute FEV1, FVC, TLC, and TLCO values from patients' first presentations were transformed and presented as % predicted and z-scores using the most recent global lung initiative (GLI) reference values. Results were categorized for severity according to % predicted and z-score levels. Predictors of all-cause mortality over a 14-year follow-up were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Between January 2009 and March 2023, 6,808 patients with ILDs were evaluated at the National TB and Lung Diseases Research Institute in Warsaw, Poland. Most were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, fibrotic ILD, or non-fibrotic ILD. At their first presentation, 13.2% had airway obstruction, 23.1% had low FVC (indicative of restriction by spirometry), and 45.6% had a reduced lung transfer factor (TLCO). Reclassification of spirometric indices occurred in 26.8% of patients for FEV1 and 24.6% for FVC among those with abnormal results, with most being reassigned to a less severe categories. For TLCO, 28.1% of patients with reduced values were reclassified, with most shifting to more severe categories. During the follow-up, 1,525 (22.4%) of patients died. Both low FVC and low TLCO predicted all-cause mortality, with z-score thresholds showing stronger associations with mortality. A one-unit decrease in the FVC z-score was associated with a 10.3% increase in the risk of death, while a one-unit decrease in TLCO z-score was linked to an over 30% increase in mortality risk. Limitations of this retrospective single-center study include lack of data on cause-specific mortality, potential residual confounding, and limited generalizability to non-Caucasian or younger populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recently recommended use of z-scores leads to significant reclassification of lung function results in patients with ILDs, largely driven by age. This approach is justified by its stronger prognostic associations. Severe TLCO impairment remains a robust predictor of mortality in ILDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"e1004619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004619\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺功能测试(PFTs)对于预测间质性肺疾病(ILD)的预后至关重要。2022年,一个专家小组建议使用z分数代替传统的%预测临界值来解释PFT异常的严重程度,这可能导致一些患者的分类不一致。为了评估这一现象的重要性和对预后的影响,我们比较了这两种方法在预测ild患者全因死亡率方面的效果。方法和研究结果:我们回顾性分析了来自三级转诊中心的ild患者的数据。对患者首次就诊的绝对FEV1、FVC、TLC和TLCO值进行转换,并使用最新的全球肺主动性(GLI)参考值表示为预测%和z分数。根据预测百分比和z-score水平对结果的严重程度进行分类。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归确定14年随访期间全因死亡率的预测因子。在2009年1月至2023年3月期间,在波兰华沙的国家结核病和肺病研究所对6808名ild患者进行了评估。大多数被诊断为结节病、纤维化性ILD或非纤维化性ILD。在首次就诊时,13.2%的患者有气道阻塞,23.1%的患者FVC低(肺活量测定法表明受限),45.6%的患者肺转移因子(TLCO)降低。在结果异常的FEV1患者中,26.8%的患者和24.6%的FVC患者重新分类肺活量测定指标,其中大多数被重新分配到较轻的类别。对于TLCO, 28.1%的降低值患者被重新分类,大多数转移到更严重的类别。随访期间,1525例(22.4%)患者死亡。低FVC和低TLCO预测全因死亡率,z-score阈值显示与死亡率有较强的相关性。FVC z-评分每降低一个单位,死亡风险增加10.3%,而TLCO z-评分每降低一个单位,死亡风险增加30%以上。这项回顾性单中心研究的局限性包括缺乏病因特异性死亡率的数据,潜在的残留混淆,以及对非白种人或年轻人群的有限推广。结论:最近推荐使用z评分导致ild患者肺功能结果的显著重新分类,主要由年龄驱动。这种方法是合理的,因为它与预后有更强的联系。严重的TLCO损伤仍然是ild死亡率的可靠预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of lung function and severity grading in interstitial lung diseases (% predicted versus z-scores) and association with survival: A retrospective cohort study of 6,808 patients.

Background: Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are essential for predicting outcomes in interstitial lung disease (ILD). In 2022, an expert panel recommended using z-scores instead of the traditional % predicted cut-off values to interpret the severity of PFT abnormalities which may lead to discordant classifications in some patients. To assess the magnitude and prognostic impact of this phenomenon we compared these two approaches in predicting all-cause mortality in a large cohort of patients with ILDs.

Methods and findings: We retrospectively analyzed data from a tertiary referral center for patients with ILDs. Absolute FEV1, FVC, TLC, and TLCO values from patients' first presentations were transformed and presented as % predicted and z-scores using the most recent global lung initiative (GLI) reference values. Results were categorized for severity according to % predicted and z-score levels. Predictors of all-cause mortality over a 14-year follow-up were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Between January 2009 and March 2023, 6,808 patients with ILDs were evaluated at the National TB and Lung Diseases Research Institute in Warsaw, Poland. Most were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, fibrotic ILD, or non-fibrotic ILD. At their first presentation, 13.2% had airway obstruction, 23.1% had low FVC (indicative of restriction by spirometry), and 45.6% had a reduced lung transfer factor (TLCO). Reclassification of spirometric indices occurred in 26.8% of patients for FEV1 and 24.6% for FVC among those with abnormal results, with most being reassigned to a less severe categories. For TLCO, 28.1% of patients with reduced values were reclassified, with most shifting to more severe categories. During the follow-up, 1,525 (22.4%) of patients died. Both low FVC and low TLCO predicted all-cause mortality, with z-score thresholds showing stronger associations with mortality. A one-unit decrease in the FVC z-score was associated with a 10.3% increase in the risk of death, while a one-unit decrease in TLCO z-score was linked to an over 30% increase in mortality risk. Limitations of this retrospective single-center study include lack of data on cause-specific mortality, potential residual confounding, and limited generalizability to non-Caucasian or younger populations.

Conclusions: The recently recommended use of z-scores leads to significant reclassification of lung function results in patients with ILDs, largely driven by age. This approach is justified by its stronger prognostic associations. Severe TLCO impairment remains a robust predictor of mortality in ILDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信