[新辅助免疫治疗对晚期胃癌患者术后并发症及近期疗效的影响]。

A N Shi, Y B Zhou, G H Wang
{"title":"[新辅助免疫治疗对晚期胃癌患者术后并发症及近期疗效的影响]。","authors":"A N Shi, Y B Zhou, G H Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250310-00121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on intra-treatment complications, postoperative complications,and short-term efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study. Clinical and pathological data were collected from 103 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgical treatment at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,between January 2021 and December 2024. Among the patients,70 were male and 33 were female;the age was (58±10)years(range: 29 to 79 years). Patients were divided into two groups based on the neoadjuvant treatment regimen: the chemotherapy-alone group (56 patients) and the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group(47 patients). There was no statistical significance in the differences of age, gender distribution, tumor location and abdominal surgery history between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Comparisons between the two groups were performed using Welch's <i>t</i>-test,<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> test or Fisher's exact probability test,respectively. <b>Results:</b> No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events during neoadjuvant therapy between the two groups (44.7%(21/47) <i>vs.</i> 60.7% (34/56),<i>P</i>>0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences in R0 resection rates (97.9%(46/47) <i>vs.</i> 91.1%(51/56)) and hospitalization costs for surgery((91 759±24 572) yuan <i>vs.</i> (96 873±17 367) yuan) between the two groups (both <i>P</i>>0.05). Additionally,the overall postoperative complication rates between the two groups were not significantly different (29.8%(14/47) <i>vs.</i> 26.8%(15/56) ,<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.114,<i>P</i>>0.05).In terms of short-term efficacy,the proportion of responders(tumor regression grade 0 and 1) was significantly higher in the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy-alone group (36.2%(17/47) <i>vs.</i> 14.3%(8/56), <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=6.658, <i>P</i>=0.010). <b>Conclusions:</b> Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy does not increase the incidence of adverse events,surgical resection difficulty,or postoperative complications compared to chemotherapy alone. In terms of short-term efficacy,the addition of immunotherapy shows better performance in tumor regression grade compared to chemotherapy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":60685,"journal":{"name":"中华外科杂志","volume":"63 7","pages":"581-586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on postoperative complications and short-term efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer].\",\"authors\":\"A N Shi, Y B Zhou, G H Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250310-00121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on intra-treatment complications, postoperative complications,and short-term efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study. Clinical and pathological data were collected from 103 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgical treatment at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,between January 2021 and December 2024. Among the patients,70 were male and 33 were female;the age was (58±10)years(range: 29 to 79 years). Patients were divided into two groups based on the neoadjuvant treatment regimen: the chemotherapy-alone group (56 patients) and the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group(47 patients). There was no statistical significance in the differences of age, gender distribution, tumor location and abdominal surgery history between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Comparisons between the two groups were performed using Welch's <i>t</i>-test,<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> test or Fisher's exact probability test,respectively. <b>Results:</b> No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events during neoadjuvant therapy between the two groups (44.7%(21/47) <i>vs.</i> 60.7% (34/56),<i>P</i>>0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences in R0 resection rates (97.9%(46/47) <i>vs.</i> 91.1%(51/56)) and hospitalization costs for surgery((91 759±24 572) yuan <i>vs.</i> (96 873±17 367) yuan) between the two groups (both <i>P</i>>0.05). Additionally,the overall postoperative complication rates between the two groups were not significantly different (29.8%(14/47) <i>vs.</i> 26.8%(15/56) ,<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.114,<i>P</i>>0.05).In terms of short-term efficacy,the proportion of responders(tumor regression grade 0 and 1) was significantly higher in the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy-alone group (36.2%(17/47) <i>vs.</i> 14.3%(8/56), <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=6.658, <i>P</i>=0.010). <b>Conclusions:</b> Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy does not increase the incidence of adverse events,surgical resection difficulty,or postoperative complications compared to chemotherapy alone. In terms of short-term efficacy,the addition of immunotherapy shows better performance in tumor regression grade compared to chemotherapy alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":60685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"63 7\",\"pages\":\"581-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250310-00121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250310-00121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨新辅助免疫治疗对晚期胃癌患者治疗内并发症、术后并发症及近期疗效的影响。方法:回顾性队列研究。收集2021年1月至2024年12月在华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院胃肠外科接受新辅助治疗及后续手术治疗的103例晚期胃癌患者的临床及病理资料。其中男性70例,女性33例,年龄(58±10)岁,年龄范围29 ~ 79岁。根据新辅助治疗方案将患者分为两组:单独化疗组(56例)和免疫治疗加化疗组(47例)。两组患者年龄、性别分布、肿瘤部位、腹部手术史差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间比较分别采用Welch’st检验、χ2检验或Fisher精确概率检验。结果:两组患者在新辅助治疗期间不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(44.7%(21/47)比58.9%(33/56),P < 0.05)。两组R0切除率(97.9%(46/47)比91.1%(51/56))、手术住院费用((91 759±24 572)元比(96 873±17 367)元)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组术后总并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(29.8%(14/47)vs 26.8%(15/56),P < 0.05)。短期疗效方面,免疫治疗联合化疗组应答者(肿瘤消退0级和1级)比例明显高于单纯化疗组(36.2%(17/47)比14.3%(8/56),χ2=6.658, p结论:新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗与单纯化疗相比,不良事件发生率、手术切除难度、术后并发症发生率均未增加。就短期疗效而言,与单独化疗相比,联合免疫治疗在肿瘤消退级别上表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on postoperative complications and short-term efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer].

Objective: To investigate the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on intra-treatment complications, postoperative complications,and short-term efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Clinical and pathological data were collected from 103 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgical treatment at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,between January 2021 and December 2024. Among the patients,70 were male and 33 were female;the age was (58±10)years(range: 29 to 79 years). Patients were divided into two groups based on the neoadjuvant treatment regimen: the chemotherapy-alone group (56 patients) and the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group(47 patients). There was no statistical significance in the differences of age, gender distribution, tumor location and abdominal surgery history between the two groups (all P>0.05). Comparisons between the two groups were performed using Welch's t-test,χ2 test or Fisher's exact probability test,respectively. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events during neoadjuvant therapy between the two groups (44.7%(21/47) vs. 60.7% (34/56),P>0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences in R0 resection rates (97.9%(46/47) vs. 91.1%(51/56)) and hospitalization costs for surgery((91 759±24 572) yuan vs. (96 873±17 367) yuan) between the two groups (both P>0.05). Additionally,the overall postoperative complication rates between the two groups were not significantly different (29.8%(14/47) vs. 26.8%(15/56) ,χ2=0.114,P>0.05).In terms of short-term efficacy,the proportion of responders(tumor regression grade 0 and 1) was significantly higher in the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy-alone group (36.2%(17/47) vs. 14.3%(8/56), χ2=6.658, P=0.010). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy does not increase the incidence of adverse events,surgical resection difficulty,or postoperative complications compared to chemotherapy alone. In terms of short-term efficacy,the addition of immunotherapy shows better performance in tumor regression grade compared to chemotherapy alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20861
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg (monthly) is a high-level medical science and technology journal approved by the General Administration of Press and Publication of the People's Republic of China, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology, and organised by the Chinese Medical Association for domestic and international public circulation. It was founded in January 1951, and is published on the basis of the Journal of Chinese Surgery. The Journal is aimed at senior and intermediate surgeons and related researchers, mainly reporting the leading scientific research results and clinical experience in the field of surgery, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding effect on the clinical work of surgery. Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg is committed to reflecting the major research progress in the field of surgery in China and promoting academic exchanges at home and abroad. The main columns include thesis, meta-analysis, review, expert forum, synthesis, case report, diagnosis and treatment experience, technical exchange, clinical case discussion, academic controversy, and special lectures, etc. The journal has been accepted by the National Academy of Medicine of the United States. The journal has been included in many famous databases at home and abroad, such as the Biomedical Analysis and Online Retrieval System (MEDLINE) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信