为受监护的老年人作出临终关怀决定。

The elder law journal Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Zachary Sager, Casey Catlin, Heather Connors, Timothy Farrell, Pamela Teaster, Jennifer Moye
{"title":"为受监护的老年人作出临终关怀决定。","authors":"Zachary Sager, Casey Catlin, Heather Connors, Timothy Farrell, Pamela Teaster, Jennifer Moye","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Article addresses end-of-life decision-making by guardians of older adults. First, the Article presents current definitions of hospice and palliative care and describes several common end-of-life disease trajectories. This background information introduces the diverse contexts in which guardians may find themselves when making end-of-life care decisions. The next section sets forth results of our recent research focusing on end-of-life care for unbefriended adults subject to guardianship. \"Unbefriended\" adults are thoses who lack decision-making capacity, have no advance directive, and have no family or friends to serve as a surrogate decision-maker. As such, professional guardians may be appointed when health care decisions are needed. Making health care decisions for such adults, particularly end-of-life care decisions, can be challenging. Little to nothing may be known about the person's values prior to guardianship and the patient may be unable to convey his or her wishes and goals to the guardian. The third section provides practical guidance to guardians. We discuss the assessment of values-with some thoughts about what to do when it is not possible to assess values. Finally, we discuss several common end-of-life health care decisions that may confront guardians-a code status change, a do not transfer order, and deescalating care within an intensive care unit. For these situations, we provide information from the perspective of our interdisciplinary team for the purposes of supporting guardians who face these challenging decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":87150,"journal":{"name":"The elder law journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6660004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making End-of-Life Care Decisions for Older Adults Subject to Guardianship.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Sager, Casey Catlin, Heather Connors, Timothy Farrell, Pamela Teaster, Jennifer Moye\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This Article addresses end-of-life decision-making by guardians of older adults. First, the Article presents current definitions of hospice and palliative care and describes several common end-of-life disease trajectories. This background information introduces the diverse contexts in which guardians may find themselves when making end-of-life care decisions. The next section sets forth results of our recent research focusing on end-of-life care for unbefriended adults subject to guardianship. \\\"Unbefriended\\\" adults are thoses who lack decision-making capacity, have no advance directive, and have no family or friends to serve as a surrogate decision-maker. As such, professional guardians may be appointed when health care decisions are needed. Making health care decisions for such adults, particularly end-of-life care decisions, can be challenging. Little to nothing may be known about the person's values prior to guardianship and the patient may be unable to convey his or her wishes and goals to the guardian. The third section provides practical guidance to guardians. We discuss the assessment of values-with some thoughts about what to do when it is not possible to assess values. Finally, we discuss several common end-of-life health care decisions that may confront guardians-a code status change, a do not transfer order, and deescalating care within an intensive care unit. For these situations, we provide information from the perspective of our interdisciplinary team for the purposes of supporting guardians who face these challenging decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The elder law journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6660004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The elder law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The elder law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了老年人监护人的临终决定。首先,这篇文章介绍了临终关怀和姑息治疗的当前定义,并描述了几种常见的临终疾病轨迹。这些背景信息介绍了监护人在做出临终关怀决定时可能会发现自己的不同背景。下一节阐述了我们最近的研究结果,重点是对受监护的没有朋友的成年人的临终关怀。“没有朋友”的成年人是指那些缺乏决策能力、没有事先指示、没有家人或朋友作为替代决策者的人。因此,在需要作出保健决定时,可指定专业监护人。为这些成年人做出医疗保健决定,尤其是临终关怀决定,可能具有挑战性。在被监护之前,病人对自己的价值观知之甚少,甚至一无所知,病人可能无法向监护人表达自己的愿望和目标。第三部分为监护人提供实践指导。我们讨论了价值评估,并思考了在无法评估价值时该怎么做。最后,我们讨论了监护者可能面临的几个常见的临终卫生保健决定——代码状态改变、不转移命令和重症监护病房内的降级护理。对于这些情况,我们从跨学科团队的角度提供信息,以支持面临这些具有挑战性决定的监护人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making End-of-Life Care Decisions for Older Adults Subject to Guardianship.

This Article addresses end-of-life decision-making by guardians of older adults. First, the Article presents current definitions of hospice and palliative care and describes several common end-of-life disease trajectories. This background information introduces the diverse contexts in which guardians may find themselves when making end-of-life care decisions. The next section sets forth results of our recent research focusing on end-of-life care for unbefriended adults subject to guardianship. "Unbefriended" adults are thoses who lack decision-making capacity, have no advance directive, and have no family or friends to serve as a surrogate decision-maker. As such, professional guardians may be appointed when health care decisions are needed. Making health care decisions for such adults, particularly end-of-life care decisions, can be challenging. Little to nothing may be known about the person's values prior to guardianship and the patient may be unable to convey his or her wishes and goals to the guardian. The third section provides practical guidance to guardians. We discuss the assessment of values-with some thoughts about what to do when it is not possible to assess values. Finally, we discuss several common end-of-life health care decisions that may confront guardians-a code status change, a do not transfer order, and deescalating care within an intensive care unit. For these situations, we provide information from the perspective of our interdisciplinary team for the purposes of supporting guardians who face these challenging decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信