一项针对越南北部妊娠期糖尿病妇女的共同创建的自我保健和非正式支持干预(VALID-II):一项两组非随机可行性研究的方案。

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ditte S Linde, Hieu M Le, Dung T K Vu, Ngoc-Anh T Dang, Ai T Nguyen, Tuc P Vu, Xuan-Bai Nguyen, Cuong D Nguyen, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Jens Søndergaard, Christina A Vinter, Ib C Bygbjerg, Vibeke Rasch, Thanh D Nguyen, Tine M Gammeltoft, Dang K Nguyen
{"title":"一项针对越南北部妊娠期糖尿病妇女的共同创建的自我保健和非正式支持干预(VALID-II):一项两组非随机可行性研究的方案。","authors":"Ditte S Linde, Hieu M Le, Dung T K Vu, Ngoc-Anh T Dang, Ai T Nguyen, Tuc P Vu, Xuan-Bai Nguyen, Cuong D Nguyen, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Jens Søndergaard, Christina A Vinter, Ib C Bygbjerg, Vibeke Rasch, Thanh D Nguyen, Tine M Gammeltoft, Dang K Nguyen","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01657-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a transitory form of diabetes that presents during pregnancy with frequent adverse maternal and neonatal health consequences if left untreated. The prevalence of GDM is rapidly increasing in low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam, and early sustainable interventions are important. The overall aim of this study-henceforth referred to as VALID-II-is to assess the feasibility of a co-created self-care and informal support intervention targeted at pregnant women with GDM. Further, the aim is to assess the potential efficacy of the intervention in reducing maternal and neonatal health complications compared with standard care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VALID-II is a two-site, two-arm, non-randomised feasibility intervention study in Thai Binh Province in northern Vietnam with a delayed start for the intervention group. The intervention study is nested in a larger cohort. In total, 2000 pregnant women will be screened for GDM, with an estimated 400 women screening positive according to the World Health Organisation-International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group diagnostic criteria. First, 200 women who screen positive for GDM will be assigned to a control group that will receive standard care. Among the 200 women, 20 will take part in an in-depth ethnographic study along with their family members, and the intervention will be co-created with them. Second, once the intervention has been created, 200 women will be assigned to the intervention group, which will receive the intervention plus standard care. Twenty women and their families from the intervention group will also take part in an ethnographic study. The primary outcome is to evaluate how feasible the self-care intervention is (composite outcome: recruitment, retention, and acceptability). Other secondary outcomes include the number of new-borns born large for gestational age, prevalence and risk factors for GDM, self-care agency, self-care, and breastfeeding practices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides knowledge of the feasibility of informal/self-care and social support interventions and their preliminary impact on maternal and child health outcomes among women with GDM in northern Vietnam. Furthermore, it will inform parameters such as effect size and variance, which are essential for calculating the sample size needed to achieve the desired power in a future full-scale trial. This may guide decision makers in how to optimise the management of GDM in low- and middle-income contexts.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05744856.</p><p><strong>Trial status: </strong>Recruiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A co-created self-care and informal support intervention targeting women with gestational diabetes mellitus in northern Vietnam (VALID-II): a protocol for a two-arm non-randomised feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Ditte S Linde, Hieu M Le, Dung T K Vu, Ngoc-Anh T Dang, Ai T Nguyen, Tuc P Vu, Xuan-Bai Nguyen, Cuong D Nguyen, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Jens Søndergaard, Christina A Vinter, Ib C Bygbjerg, Vibeke Rasch, Thanh D Nguyen, Tine M Gammeltoft, Dang K Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-025-01657-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a transitory form of diabetes that presents during pregnancy with frequent adverse maternal and neonatal health consequences if left untreated. The prevalence of GDM is rapidly increasing in low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam, and early sustainable interventions are important. The overall aim of this study-henceforth referred to as VALID-II-is to assess the feasibility of a co-created self-care and informal support intervention targeted at pregnant women with GDM. Further, the aim is to assess the potential efficacy of the intervention in reducing maternal and neonatal health complications compared with standard care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VALID-II is a two-site, two-arm, non-randomised feasibility intervention study in Thai Binh Province in northern Vietnam with a delayed start for the intervention group. The intervention study is nested in a larger cohort. In total, 2000 pregnant women will be screened for GDM, with an estimated 400 women screening positive according to the World Health Organisation-International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group diagnostic criteria. First, 200 women who screen positive for GDM will be assigned to a control group that will receive standard care. Among the 200 women, 20 will take part in an in-depth ethnographic study along with their family members, and the intervention will be co-created with them. Second, once the intervention has been created, 200 women will be assigned to the intervention group, which will receive the intervention plus standard care. Twenty women and their families from the intervention group will also take part in an ethnographic study. The primary outcome is to evaluate how feasible the self-care intervention is (composite outcome: recruitment, retention, and acceptability). Other secondary outcomes include the number of new-borns born large for gestational age, prevalence and risk factors for GDM, self-care agency, self-care, and breastfeeding practices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides knowledge of the feasibility of informal/self-care and social support interventions and their preliminary impact on maternal and child health outcomes among women with GDM in northern Vietnam. Furthermore, it will inform parameters such as effect size and variance, which are essential for calculating the sample size needed to achieve the desired power in a future full-scale trial. This may guide decision makers in how to optimise the management of GDM in low- and middle-income contexts.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05744856.</p><p><strong>Trial status: </strong>Recruiting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121233/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01657-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01657-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种暂时性糖尿病,在妊娠期间出现,如果不及时治疗,通常会对孕产妇和新生儿健康造成不良后果。在越南等低收入和中等收入国家,GDM的患病率正在迅速上升,早期可持续干预措施非常重要。本研究的总体目的(以下简称validity - ii)是评估针对妊娠糖尿病孕妇共同创建的自我护理和非正式支持干预的可行性。此外,目的是评估与标准护理相比,干预措施在减少孕产妇和新生儿健康并发症方面的潜在功效。方法:validity - ii是一项在越南北部泰平省进行的两地点、两组、非随机干预可行性研究,干预组延迟开始。干预研究嵌套在一个更大的队列中。总共将有2000名孕妇接受GDM筛查,根据世界卫生组织-国际糖尿病和妊娠研究小组协会的诊断标准,估计有400名妇女筛查呈阳性。首先,200名GDM筛查呈阳性的女性将被分配到对照组,接受标准治疗。在这200名女性中,有20名将与其家人一起参与一项深入的人种学研究,干预措施将与她们共同制定。其次,一旦干预被创造出来,200名妇女将被分配到干预组,她们将接受干预和标准护理。来自干预组的20名妇女及其家庭也将参加一项人种学研究。主要结果是评估自我护理干预的可行性(复合结果:招募、保留和可接受性)。其他次要结局包括大胎龄新生儿的数量、GDM的患病率和危险因素、自我保健机构、自我保健和母乳喂养做法。讨论:本研究提供了非正式/自我保健和社会支持干预措施的可行性及其对越南北部GDM妇女母婴健康结局的初步影响的知识。此外,它将告知诸如效应大小和方差等参数,这些参数对于计算在未来全面试验中达到所需功率所需的样本量至关重要。这可以指导决策者如何优化低收入和中等收入环境下的GDM管理。试验注册:NCT05744856。试用状态:招募。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A co-created self-care and informal support intervention targeting women with gestational diabetes mellitus in northern Vietnam (VALID-II): a protocol for a two-arm non-randomised feasibility study.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a transitory form of diabetes that presents during pregnancy with frequent adverse maternal and neonatal health consequences if left untreated. The prevalence of GDM is rapidly increasing in low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam, and early sustainable interventions are important. The overall aim of this study-henceforth referred to as VALID-II-is to assess the feasibility of a co-created self-care and informal support intervention targeted at pregnant women with GDM. Further, the aim is to assess the potential efficacy of the intervention in reducing maternal and neonatal health complications compared with standard care.

Methods: VALID-II is a two-site, two-arm, non-randomised feasibility intervention study in Thai Binh Province in northern Vietnam with a delayed start for the intervention group. The intervention study is nested in a larger cohort. In total, 2000 pregnant women will be screened for GDM, with an estimated 400 women screening positive according to the World Health Organisation-International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group diagnostic criteria. First, 200 women who screen positive for GDM will be assigned to a control group that will receive standard care. Among the 200 women, 20 will take part in an in-depth ethnographic study along with their family members, and the intervention will be co-created with them. Second, once the intervention has been created, 200 women will be assigned to the intervention group, which will receive the intervention plus standard care. Twenty women and their families from the intervention group will also take part in an ethnographic study. The primary outcome is to evaluate how feasible the self-care intervention is (composite outcome: recruitment, retention, and acceptability). Other secondary outcomes include the number of new-borns born large for gestational age, prevalence and risk factors for GDM, self-care agency, self-care, and breastfeeding practices.

Discussion: This study provides knowledge of the feasibility of informal/self-care and social support interventions and their preliminary impact on maternal and child health outcomes among women with GDM in northern Vietnam. Furthermore, it will inform parameters such as effect size and variance, which are essential for calculating the sample size needed to achieve the desired power in a future full-scale trial. This may guide decision makers in how to optimise the management of GDM in low- and middle-income contexts.

Trial registration: NCT05744856.

Trial status: Recruiting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信