1026例种植体颈部设计对牙体断裂的影响

Hirotaka Muraoka, Takashi Kaneda, Kotaro Ito, Tomohiro Komatsu, Satoshi Tokunaga, Osamu Sakai
{"title":"1026例种植体颈部设计对牙体断裂的影响","authors":"Hirotaka Muraoka, Takashi Kaneda, Kotaro Ito, Tomohiro Komatsu, Satoshi Tokunaga, Osamu Sakai","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the factors contributing to dental implant fracture while focusing on different bone-level (BL) or soft-tissue-level (STL) neck designs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study analyzed 311 patients with 1,026 implants treated between April 2021 and March 2023. The proportions of dental implant sites were 13.6% (140/1026), 31.8% (326/1026), and 54.6% (560/1026) in the anterior teeth, premolars, and molars, respectively. The study investigated the presence or absence of implant fracture due to differences in BL or STL neck designs. The two groups were compared using Pearson's chi-square test. These tests used the morphology of the dental implant neck design as the criterion variable, while the presence or absence of implant fractures served as the explanatory variable. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of implant fracture was 3/683 (0.4%) and 0/343 (0%) in the BL and STL groups, respectively (P = .56). By site, the rate was 0/140 (0.0%) in the anterior teeth, 0/326 (0.0%) in the premolars, and 3/560 (0.5%) in the molars (P = .55). No sex difference was observed in the presence of implant fractures (P = .18). However, a significant age difference was observed between the groups with and without fractures (P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All implant fractures occurred in the BL group in this study. Our findings suggest that differences in dental implant neck design are an important factor associated with dental implant fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Factors Contributing to Dental Implant Fracture: Impact of Neck Design in 1,026 Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Hirotaka Muraoka, Takashi Kaneda, Kotaro Ito, Tomohiro Komatsu, Satoshi Tokunaga, Osamu Sakai\",\"doi\":\"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the factors contributing to dental implant fracture while focusing on different bone-level (BL) or soft-tissue-level (STL) neck designs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study analyzed 311 patients with 1,026 implants treated between April 2021 and March 2023. The proportions of dental implant sites were 13.6% (140/1026), 31.8% (326/1026), and 54.6% (560/1026) in the anterior teeth, premolars, and molars, respectively. The study investigated the presence or absence of implant fracture due to differences in BL or STL neck designs. The two groups were compared using Pearson's chi-square test. These tests used the morphology of the dental implant neck design as the criterion variable, while the presence or absence of implant fractures served as the explanatory variable. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of implant fracture was 3/683 (0.4%) and 0/343 (0%) in the BL and STL groups, respectively (P = .56). By site, the rate was 0/140 (0.0%) in the anterior teeth, 0/326 (0.0%) in the premolars, and 3/560 (0.5%) in the molars (P = .55). No sex difference was observed in the presence of implant fractures (P = .18). However, a significant age difference was observed between the groups with and without fractures (P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All implant fractures occurred in the BL group in this study. Our findings suggest that differences in dental implant neck design are an important factor associated with dental implant fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of oral implantology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of oral implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估导致种植体骨折的因素,同时关注不同骨水平(BL)或软组织水平(STL)颈部设计。材料和方法:本研究分析了311例患者在2021年4月至2023年3月期间接受的1,026例种植体治疗。种植位置分别为前牙13.6%(140/1026)、前磨牙31.8%(326/1026)、磨牙54.6%(560/1026)。该研究调查了由于BL或STL颈部设计的差异而导致的植入物骨折的存在或不存在。两组比较采用Pearson卡方检验。这些试验使用种植体颈部的形态设计作为标准变量,而种植体骨折的存在与否作为解释变量。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:BL组和STL组种植体骨折发生率分别为3/683(0.4%)和0/343(0%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.56)。按部位分,前牙为0/140(0.0%),前磨牙为0/326(0.0%),磨牙为3/560 (0.5%)(P = 0.55)。植入物骨折的性别差异无统计学意义(P = 0.18)。然而,有骨折组和无骨折组的年龄差异显著(P = .03)。结论:本研究中BL组均发生假体骨折。我们的研究结果表明,种植体颈部设计的差异是导致种植体骨折的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Factors Contributing to Dental Implant Fracture: Impact of Neck Design in 1,026 Implants.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the factors contributing to dental implant fracture while focusing on different bone-level (BL) or soft-tissue-level (STL) neck designs.

Materials and methods: This study analyzed 311 patients with 1,026 implants treated between April 2021 and March 2023. The proportions of dental implant sites were 13.6% (140/1026), 31.8% (326/1026), and 54.6% (560/1026) in the anterior teeth, premolars, and molars, respectively. The study investigated the presence or absence of implant fracture due to differences in BL or STL neck designs. The two groups were compared using Pearson's chi-square test. These tests used the morphology of the dental implant neck design as the criterion variable, while the presence or absence of implant fractures served as the explanatory variable. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results: The rate of implant fracture was 3/683 (0.4%) and 0/343 (0%) in the BL and STL groups, respectively (P = .56). By site, the rate was 0/140 (0.0%) in the anterior teeth, 0/326 (0.0%) in the premolars, and 3/560 (0.5%) in the molars (P = .55). No sex difference was observed in the presence of implant fractures (P = .18). However, a significant age difference was observed between the groups with and without fractures (P = .03).

Conclusion: All implant fractures occurred in the BL group in this study. Our findings suggest that differences in dental implant neck design are an important factor associated with dental implant fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信