Stephanie M. Street , Rebecca A. Bader , Whitney V. Christian
{"title":"化学特性鉴定水平的未知置信度:当暂定鉴定足以用于医疗器械的毒理学风险评估时。","authors":"Stephanie M. Street , Rebecca A. Bader , Whitney V. Christian","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying chemicals is critical to chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessments (TRAs) for evaluating patient safety risks posed from medical devices. The burden to accurately identify substances with limited information is high. There is lack of consensus on the confidence needed for compound identifications to conduct a TRA. To address this gap, chemical characterization reports and TRAs were evaluated, and many tentatively identified compounds were grouped into chemical classes, which may consist of all tentative identifications or a mixture of identifications, then treated as one compound. By using this approach, the confidence level of each group member was not used to modulate the outcome of the risk assessment, obviating the need for confirmed identification of each group member. By understanding the downstream confidence level utilization, the burden involved in determining confident identification for all compounds detected during chemical characterization can be reduced to aspects of compound identification that may pose higher toxicological importance. A decision tree was developed to focus the identification process on compounds of interest as well as a method to assign confidence levels. This tool can be used to reduce the burden in identifying individual confidence levels without compromising the reliability of the conclusion of the TRA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105862"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unknown confidence in chemical characterization identification levels: When tentative identifications are adequate for toxicological risk assessment of medical devices\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie M. Street , Rebecca A. Bader , Whitney V. Christian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Identifying chemicals is critical to chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessments (TRAs) for evaluating patient safety risks posed from medical devices. The burden to accurately identify substances with limited information is high. There is lack of consensus on the confidence needed for compound identifications to conduct a TRA. To address this gap, chemical characterization reports and TRAs were evaluated, and many tentatively identified compounds were grouped into chemical classes, which may consist of all tentative identifications or a mixture of identifications, then treated as one compound. By using this approach, the confidence level of each group member was not used to modulate the outcome of the risk assessment, obviating the need for confirmed identification of each group member. By understanding the downstream confidence level utilization, the burden involved in determining confident identification for all compounds detected during chemical characterization can be reduced to aspects of compound identification that may pose higher toxicological importance. A decision tree was developed to focus the identification process on compounds of interest as well as a method to assign confidence levels. This tool can be used to reduce the burden in identifying individual confidence levels without compromising the reliability of the conclusion of the TRA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unknown confidence in chemical characterization identification levels: When tentative identifications are adequate for toxicological risk assessment of medical devices
Identifying chemicals is critical to chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessments (TRAs) for evaluating patient safety risks posed from medical devices. The burden to accurately identify substances with limited information is high. There is lack of consensus on the confidence needed for compound identifications to conduct a TRA. To address this gap, chemical characterization reports and TRAs were evaluated, and many tentatively identified compounds were grouped into chemical classes, which may consist of all tentative identifications or a mixture of identifications, then treated as one compound. By using this approach, the confidence level of each group member was not used to modulate the outcome of the risk assessment, obviating the need for confirmed identification of each group member. By understanding the downstream confidence level utilization, the burden involved in determining confident identification for all compounds detected during chemical characterization can be reduced to aspects of compound identification that may pose higher toxicological importance. A decision tree was developed to focus the identification process on compounds of interest as well as a method to assign confidence levels. This tool can be used to reduce the burden in identifying individual confidence levels without compromising the reliability of the conclusion of the TRA.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)