糖化白蛋白候选EQA材料的交换性评价。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Rui Wu, Huijuan Zhou, Xiaerbanu Nizhamnuding, Anqi Pan, Hao Zheng, Jiangtao Zhang, Haijian Zhao, Jing Wang, Tianjiao Zhang, Chuanbao Zhang
{"title":"糖化白蛋白候选EQA材料的交换性评价。","authors":"Rui Wu, Huijuan Zhou, Xiaerbanu Nizhamnuding, Anqi Pan, Hao Zheng, Jiangtao Zhang, Haijian Zhao, Jing Wang, Tianjiao Zhang, Chuanbao Zhang","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In clinical practice, glycated albumin (GA), as a key biomarker reflecting the level of blood glucose control in the short and medium term, has been widely used in the diagnosis and efficacy monitoring of diabetes. However, the consistency of GA results between different detection systems remains one of the current challenges in laboratory medicine. we evaluated the commutability of 10 evaluated samples to identify candidate EQA materials for GA measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document EP14-A3 and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) commutability evaluation program, we used the established isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) method for serum glycated albumin determination as the comparative method, and six different commercial kits used enzyme assay as the evaluating method. A total of 40 clinical sample serums, 9 pregnancy sample serums, and 10 evaluated samples were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the CLSI approach, pooled serum samples (cRM1-3) at medium concentrations (cRM2) are commutable in 5/6 kits. For the IFCC approach, none of samples commutable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The commutability evaluation results of the two approaches were different, and the cRM2 has commutability in most enzymatic kits. It can be a commutable material for the EQA project.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commutability evaluation of glycated albumin candidate EQA materials.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Wu, Huijuan Zhou, Xiaerbanu Nizhamnuding, Anqi Pan, Hao Zheng, Jiangtao Zhang, Haijian Zhao, Jing Wang, Tianjiao Zhang, Chuanbao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In clinical practice, glycated albumin (GA), as a key biomarker reflecting the level of blood glucose control in the short and medium term, has been widely used in the diagnosis and efficacy monitoring of diabetes. However, the consistency of GA results between different detection systems remains one of the current challenges in laboratory medicine. we evaluated the commutability of 10 evaluated samples to identify candidate EQA materials for GA measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document EP14-A3 and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) commutability evaluation program, we used the established isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) method for serum glycated albumin determination as the comparative method, and six different commercial kits used enzyme assay as the evaluating method. A total of 40 clinical sample serums, 9 pregnancy sample serums, and 10 evaluated samples were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the CLSI approach, pooled serum samples (cRM1-3) at medium concentrations (cRM2) are commutable in 5/6 kits. For the IFCC approach, none of samples commutable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The commutability evaluation results of the two approaches were different, and the cRM2 has commutability in most enzymatic kits. It can be a commutable material for the EQA project.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0507\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在临床实践中,糖化白蛋白(glycated albumin, GA)作为反映中短期血糖控制水平的关键生物标志物,已广泛应用于糖尿病的诊断和疗效监测。然而,不同检测系统之间遗传算法结果的一致性仍然是当前检验医学面临的挑战之一。我们评估了10个评估样品的可交换性,以确定用于GA测量的候选EQA材料。方法:根据美国临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI) EP14-A3文件和国际临床化学与检验医学联合会(IFCC)可交换性评价方案,采用已建立的同位素稀释液相色谱-串联质谱(ID LC-MS/MS)法测定血清糖化白蛋白作为比较方法,6种不同的商用试剂盒采用酶法作为评价方法。共分析40份临床样本血清、9份妊娠样本血清和10份评价样本。结果:对于CLSI方法,中浓度(cRM2)的合并血清样本(cRM1-3)在5/6试剂盒中是可交换的。对于IFCC方法,没有一个样本是可交换的。结论:两种方法的可交换性评价结果不同,cRM2在大多数酶试剂盒中具有可交换性。它可以是EQA项目的可交换材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commutability evaluation of glycated albumin candidate EQA materials.

Objectives: In clinical practice, glycated albumin (GA), as a key biomarker reflecting the level of blood glucose control in the short and medium term, has been widely used in the diagnosis and efficacy monitoring of diabetes. However, the consistency of GA results between different detection systems remains one of the current challenges in laboratory medicine. we evaluated the commutability of 10 evaluated samples to identify candidate EQA materials for GA measurement.

Methods: According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document EP14-A3 and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) commutability evaluation program, we used the established isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) method for serum glycated albumin determination as the comparative method, and six different commercial kits used enzyme assay as the evaluating method. A total of 40 clinical sample serums, 9 pregnancy sample serums, and 10 evaluated samples were analyzed.

Results: For the CLSI approach, pooled serum samples (cRM1-3) at medium concentrations (cRM2) are commutable in 5/6 kits. For the IFCC approach, none of samples commutable.

Conclusions: The commutability evaluation results of the two approaches were different, and the cRM2 has commutability in most enzymatic kits. It can be a commutable material for the EQA project.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信