当预测因子总和为常数时:使用基于等距对数比变换的回归模型进行权衡效应分析。

IF 7.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jieyuan Dong, Hongyun Liu
{"title":"当预测因子总和为常数时:使用基于等距对数比变换的回归模型进行权衡效应分析。","authors":"Jieyuan Dong, Hongyun Liu","doi":"10.1037/met0000668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard regression model is not feasible when the sum of predictors is a constant, which is a common occurrence in proportional data or ipsative data. Davison et al. (2022) described a set of reduced-rank regression models in which each regression coefficient can be interpreted as a predictor trade-off effect. However, the assumption of linearity and symmetry in their method is too rigid, and the compositional nature of the predictors should not be disregarded. In this article, from the perspective of compositional data, a new method named isometric-log-ratio-transformed trade-off effect analysis (ITEA) is proposed. The predictors are transformed into isometric log-ratio coordinates using a planned sequential binary partition, and trade-off effects are then estimated using a regression model with isometric log-ratio coordinates. Instead of directly relying on regression coefficients, the trade-off effect is defined as the difference in the dependent variable before and after the trade-off, from which the 95% confidence interval can be further derived. Moreover, the main results of the ITEA are not affected by the variation in orthonormal bases. Applying the ITEA to the data in Davison et al.'s (2022) study yields more flexible and interpretable results of trade-off effects. We also provide an empirical example of a forced-choice questionnaire to verify the validity of the ITEA, with visualization attempts of trade-off effects under different conditions. Usefulness, suitable applications, and potential extensions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When predictors sum to a constant: Trade-off effect analysis using a regression model based on isometric log-ratio transformation.\",\"authors\":\"Jieyuan Dong, Hongyun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/met0000668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The standard regression model is not feasible when the sum of predictors is a constant, which is a common occurrence in proportional data or ipsative data. Davison et al. (2022) described a set of reduced-rank regression models in which each regression coefficient can be interpreted as a predictor trade-off effect. However, the assumption of linearity and symmetry in their method is too rigid, and the compositional nature of the predictors should not be disregarded. In this article, from the perspective of compositional data, a new method named isometric-log-ratio-transformed trade-off effect analysis (ITEA) is proposed. The predictors are transformed into isometric log-ratio coordinates using a planned sequential binary partition, and trade-off effects are then estimated using a regression model with isometric log-ratio coordinates. Instead of directly relying on regression coefficients, the trade-off effect is defined as the difference in the dependent variable before and after the trade-off, from which the 95% confidence interval can be further derived. Moreover, the main results of the ITEA are not affected by the variation in orthonormal bases. Applying the ITEA to the data in Davison et al.'s (2022) study yields more flexible and interpretable results of trade-off effects. We also provide an empirical example of a forced-choice questionnaire to verify the validity of the ITEA, with visualization attempts of trade-off effects under different conditions. Usefulness, suitable applications, and potential extensions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000668\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当预测因子之和为常数时,标准回归模型不可行,这在比例数据或替代数据中很常见。Davison等人(2022)描述了一组降秩回归模型,其中每个回归系数都可以解释为预测器权衡效应。然而,在他们的方法中,线性和对称的假设过于严格,并且不应忽视预测因子的组成性质。本文从成分数据的角度出发,提出了等距-对数-比值变换权衡效应分析(ITEA)的新方法。使用计划的顺序二元分割将预测因子转换为等距对数比坐标,然后使用具有等距对数比坐标的回归模型估计权衡效应。权衡效应不是直接依赖回归系数,而是定义为因变量在权衡前后的差值,由此可以进一步推导出95%置信区间。此外,ITEA的主要结果不受标准正交基变化的影响。将ITEA应用于Davison等人(2022)研究中的数据,可以获得更灵活和可解释的权衡效应结果。我们还提供了一个强迫选择问卷的实证例子来验证ITEA的有效性,并尝试可视化不同条件下的权衡效应。讨论了有用性、合适的应用和潜在的扩展。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When predictors sum to a constant: Trade-off effect analysis using a regression model based on isometric log-ratio transformation.

The standard regression model is not feasible when the sum of predictors is a constant, which is a common occurrence in proportional data or ipsative data. Davison et al. (2022) described a set of reduced-rank regression models in which each regression coefficient can be interpreted as a predictor trade-off effect. However, the assumption of linearity and symmetry in their method is too rigid, and the compositional nature of the predictors should not be disregarded. In this article, from the perspective of compositional data, a new method named isometric-log-ratio-transformed trade-off effect analysis (ITEA) is proposed. The predictors are transformed into isometric log-ratio coordinates using a planned sequential binary partition, and trade-off effects are then estimated using a regression model with isometric log-ratio coordinates. Instead of directly relying on regression coefficients, the trade-off effect is defined as the difference in the dependent variable before and after the trade-off, from which the 95% confidence interval can be further derived. Moreover, the main results of the ITEA are not affected by the variation in orthonormal bases. Applying the ITEA to the data in Davison et al.'s (2022) study yields more flexible and interpretable results of trade-off effects. We also provide an empirical example of a forced-choice questionnaire to verify the validity of the ITEA, with visualization attempts of trade-off effects under different conditions. Usefulness, suitable applications, and potential extensions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信