口服益生菌干预在出生时减少孕妇B群链球菌定植的开放标签随机对照试验和可行性研究

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Katrina Nardini CNM, WHNP-BC, MPH, Lisa Hanson CNM, PhD, Noelle Borders CNM, DNP, Maharaj Singh PhD, Anna Shields CNM, DNP, FNP, Victoria Y. Trujillo BA, Robyn Lawton CNM, Emily Malloy CNM, PhD
{"title":"口服益生菌干预在出生时减少孕妇B群链球菌定植的开放标签随机对照试验和可行性研究","authors":"Katrina Nardini CNM, WHNP-BC, MPH,&nbsp;Lisa Hanson CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Noelle Borders CNM, DNP,&nbsp;Maharaj Singh PhD,&nbsp;Anna Shields CNM, DNP, FNP,&nbsp;Victoria Y. Trujillo BA,&nbsp;Robyn Lawton CNM,&nbsp;Emily Malloy CNM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this midwife-led study was to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of probiotics to reduce group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) colonization by the time of birth in healthy, GBS-positive, pregnant adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An open-label randomized clinical trial comparing Florajen Digestion, a commercially available combination oral probiotic, with usual care (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721912) was conducted in a midwifery practice serving a racially and ethnically diverse population. Eligible patients who tested positive for GBS at routine third-trimester screening were offered informed consent and participation. The primary outcome was feasibility for a larger RCT, including feasibility of probiotic use among participants. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum GBS colonization and Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Pregnancy (AP-GI-SA) scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 68 participants were enrolled and randomized; 65 participants completed the study, but only 46 had intrapartum cultures collected and processed. Among the 23 pregnant individuals who were eligible but chose not to participate, 3 indicated that they did not want to take a probiotic. After an average of 14 days of the intervention, 7 of 25 (28%) participants in the probiotic group had a negative intrapartum GBS result compared with 3 of 21 (14.3%) in the control group (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.52-10.48). There was no difference in perinatal outcomes or AP-GI-SA scores between groups. No adverse events occurred.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The feasibility of a larger RCT was demonstrated. Challenges identified included intrapartum GBS collection and laboratory processing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was not powered to detect a significant difference in intrapartum GBS colonization, although a larger decrease in GBS colonization was noted among probiotic-using participants. Florajen Digestion may show efficacy in a RCT with a longer intervention period. It is possible that the probiotic intervention duration was too brief to show a reduction in gastrointestinal pregnancy symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 3","pages":"460-467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13765","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study of an Oral Probiotic Intervention to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant People by the Time of Birth\",\"authors\":\"Katrina Nardini CNM, WHNP-BC, MPH,&nbsp;Lisa Hanson CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Noelle Borders CNM, DNP,&nbsp;Maharaj Singh PhD,&nbsp;Anna Shields CNM, DNP, FNP,&nbsp;Victoria Y. Trujillo BA,&nbsp;Robyn Lawton CNM,&nbsp;Emily Malloy CNM, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of this midwife-led study was to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of probiotics to reduce group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) colonization by the time of birth in healthy, GBS-positive, pregnant adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An open-label randomized clinical trial comparing Florajen Digestion, a commercially available combination oral probiotic, with usual care (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721912) was conducted in a midwifery practice serving a racially and ethnically diverse population. Eligible patients who tested positive for GBS at routine third-trimester screening were offered informed consent and participation. The primary outcome was feasibility for a larger RCT, including feasibility of probiotic use among participants. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum GBS colonization and Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Pregnancy (AP-GI-SA) scores.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 68 participants were enrolled and randomized; 65 participants completed the study, but only 46 had intrapartum cultures collected and processed. Among the 23 pregnant individuals who were eligible but chose not to participate, 3 indicated that they did not want to take a probiotic. After an average of 14 days of the intervention, 7 of 25 (28%) participants in the probiotic group had a negative intrapartum GBS result compared with 3 of 21 (14.3%) in the control group (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.52-10.48). There was no difference in perinatal outcomes or AP-GI-SA scores between groups. No adverse events occurred.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The feasibility of a larger RCT was demonstrated. Challenges identified included intrapartum GBS collection and laboratory processing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was not powered to detect a significant difference in intrapartum GBS colonization, although a larger decrease in GBS colonization was noted among probiotic-using participants. Florajen Digestion may show efficacy in a RCT with a longer intervention period. It is possible that the probiotic intervention duration was too brief to show a reduction in gastrointestinal pregnancy symptoms.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\"70 3\",\"pages\":\"460-467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13765\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13765\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:这项由助产士主导的研究的目的是确定益生菌的随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,以减少出生时健康的、GBS阳性的孕妇的B族链球菌(GBS)定植。方法:一项开放标签随机临床试验比较Florajen消化,一种市售的联合口服益生菌,与常规护理(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721912),在助产实践中服务于不同种族和民族的人群。在常规妊娠晚期筛查中检测为GBS阳性的符合条件的患者给予知情同意和参与。主要结果是更大规模随机对照试验的可行性,包括参与者使用益生菌的可行性。次要结局是产时GBS定植和产前妊娠胃肠道症状(AP-GI-SA)评分。结果:共纳入68名受试者,随机分组;65名参与者完成了这项研究,但只有46名参与者收集并处理了分娩时的培养物。在23名符合条件但选择不参加的孕妇中,有3人表示她们不想服用益生菌。干预平均14天后,益生菌组25名参与者中有7名(28%)分娩时GBS结果为阴性,而对照组21名参与者中有3名(14.3%)(优势比,2.33;95% ci, 0.52-10.48)。围产儿结局或AP-GI-SA评分组间无差异。无不良事件发生。讨论:论证了更大规模随机对照试验的可行性。确定的挑战包括COVID-19大流行期间产时GBS收集和实验室处理。该研究没有发现产时GBS定植的显著差异,尽管在使用益生菌的参与者中发现了GBS定植的较大下降。在一项干预期较长的随机对照试验中,Florajen Digestion可能显示出疗效。可能益生菌干预持续时间太短,无法显示胃肠道妊娠症状的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study of an Oral Probiotic Intervention to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant People by the Time of Birth

Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study of an Oral Probiotic Intervention to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant People by the Time of Birth

Introduction

The purpose of this midwife-led study was to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of probiotics to reduce group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization by the time of birth in healthy, GBS-positive, pregnant adults.

Methods

An open-label randomized clinical trial comparing Florajen Digestion, a commercially available combination oral probiotic, with usual care (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721912) was conducted in a midwifery practice serving a racially and ethnically diverse population. Eligible patients who tested positive for GBS at routine third-trimester screening were offered informed consent and participation. The primary outcome was feasibility for a larger RCT, including feasibility of probiotic use among participants. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum GBS colonization and Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Pregnancy (AP-GI-SA) scores.

Results

A total of 68 participants were enrolled and randomized; 65 participants completed the study, but only 46 had intrapartum cultures collected and processed. Among the 23 pregnant individuals who were eligible but chose not to participate, 3 indicated that they did not want to take a probiotic. After an average of 14 days of the intervention, 7 of 25 (28%) participants in the probiotic group had a negative intrapartum GBS result compared with 3 of 21 (14.3%) in the control group (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.52-10.48). There was no difference in perinatal outcomes or AP-GI-SA scores between groups. No adverse events occurred.

Discussion

The feasibility of a larger RCT was demonstrated. Challenges identified included intrapartum GBS collection and laboratory processing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was not powered to detect a significant difference in intrapartum GBS colonization, although a larger decrease in GBS colonization was noted among probiotic-using participants. Florajen Digestion may show efficacy in a RCT with a longer intervention period. It is possible that the probiotic intervention duration was too brief to show a reduction in gastrointestinal pregnancy symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信