在诊所外重新填充鞘内给药泵:英国的实践调查。

0 REHABILITATION
Advances in rehabilitation science and practice Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536351251341016
Stephen G B Kirker
{"title":"在诊所外重新填充鞘内给药泵:英国的实践调查。","authors":"Stephen G B Kirker","doi":"10.1177/27536351251341016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many people with spasticity or pain managed with intrathecal drug delivery pumps have very impaired mobility and are at high risk of developing pressure sores, which may prevent them from travelling to a clinic in their wheelchair. Some patients may be transported by stretcher, but some will be bedbound at home. Routinely refilling all pumps at home is established practice in several parts of Europe and USA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Freedom of information requests were emailed to trusts and health boards hosting intrathecal drug delivery services in the UK and Ireland, asking about frequency of home visits for pump refills, how many staff travelled, use of prefilled syringes and how they would manage a patient's long-term inability to attend clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Detailed data was received from all but 1 of 54 active clinics in the UK, but Irish legislation did not allow this data to be returned. Two thousand one hundred forty-five patients were managed with intrathecal pumps in the UK. Eleven services had less than 10 patients and 5 had more than 100. Twenty-one services did less than 1 home refill/year and 9 did more than 12/year. Twenty had travelled to patients more than 50 miles from the clinic, or to an island. Twenty-two services would send 2 clinicians and 10 would bring prefilled sterile syringes, rather than aspirate from bottles at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FoI requests can generate a very high response rate in the UK. Many services manage a small number of patients, which would make it difficult to provide cover when a single-handed clinician is unavailable or to train a second clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":"14 ","pages":"27536351251341016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refilling Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps Outside the Clinic: Survey of Practice in the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen G B Kirker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536351251341016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many people with spasticity or pain managed with intrathecal drug delivery pumps have very impaired mobility and are at high risk of developing pressure sores, which may prevent them from travelling to a clinic in their wheelchair. Some patients may be transported by stretcher, but some will be bedbound at home. Routinely refilling all pumps at home is established practice in several parts of Europe and USA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Freedom of information requests were emailed to trusts and health boards hosting intrathecal drug delivery services in the UK and Ireland, asking about frequency of home visits for pump refills, how many staff travelled, use of prefilled syringes and how they would manage a patient's long-term inability to attend clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Detailed data was received from all but 1 of 54 active clinics in the UK, but Irish legislation did not allow this data to be returned. Two thousand one hundred forty-five patients were managed with intrathecal pumps in the UK. Eleven services had less than 10 patients and 5 had more than 100. Twenty-one services did less than 1 home refill/year and 9 did more than 12/year. Twenty had travelled to patients more than 50 miles from the clinic, or to an island. Twenty-two services would send 2 clinicians and 10 would bring prefilled sterile syringes, rather than aspirate from bottles at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FoI requests can generate a very high response rate in the UK. Many services manage a small number of patients, which would make it difficult to provide cover when a single-handed clinician is unavailable or to train a second clinician.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"27536351251341016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351251341016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351251341016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:许多使用鞘内给药泵治疗痉挛或疼痛的患者活动能力严重受损,并且患压疮的风险很高,这可能使他们无法坐轮椅去诊所。有些病人可能会被担架运送,但有些病人会被困在家里。在欧洲和美国的一些地区,常规地在家中重新填充所有泵是既定的做法。方法:通过电子邮件向英国和爱尔兰的托管鞘内给药服务的信托机构和健康委员会发送信息自由请求,询问为泵补充药物而家访的频率、有多少工作人员出差、预充注射器的使用情况以及他们将如何处理患者长期无法去诊所的情况。结果:从英国54个活跃诊所中除1个外的所有诊所都收到了详细的数据,但爱尔兰立法不允许返回这些数据。在英国,有2445名患者接受了鞘内泵治疗。11个服务中心的患者少于10人,5个服务中心的患者超过100人。21个服务机构每年少于1次,9个服务机构每年超过12次。其中20人去了离诊所50多英里远的地方,或者去了一个岛上。22家医院将派出2名临床医生,10家医院将带来预充无菌注射器,而不是从床边的瓶子里抽吸。结论:在英国,信息自由的请求可以产生非常高的响应率。许多服务机构只管理少量的病人,这将使在没有单手临床医生或培训第二名临床医生时难以提供保险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Refilling Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps Outside the Clinic: Survey of Practice in the United Kingdom.

Refilling Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps Outside the Clinic: Survey of Practice in the United Kingdom.

Refilling Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps Outside the Clinic: Survey of Practice in the United Kingdom.

Refilling Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps Outside the Clinic: Survey of Practice in the United Kingdom.

Introduction: Many people with spasticity or pain managed with intrathecal drug delivery pumps have very impaired mobility and are at high risk of developing pressure sores, which may prevent them from travelling to a clinic in their wheelchair. Some patients may be transported by stretcher, but some will be bedbound at home. Routinely refilling all pumps at home is established practice in several parts of Europe and USA.

Method: Freedom of information requests were emailed to trusts and health boards hosting intrathecal drug delivery services in the UK and Ireland, asking about frequency of home visits for pump refills, how many staff travelled, use of prefilled syringes and how they would manage a patient's long-term inability to attend clinic.

Results: Detailed data was received from all but 1 of 54 active clinics in the UK, but Irish legislation did not allow this data to be returned. Two thousand one hundred forty-five patients were managed with intrathecal pumps in the UK. Eleven services had less than 10 patients and 5 had more than 100. Twenty-one services did less than 1 home refill/year and 9 did more than 12/year. Twenty had travelled to patients more than 50 miles from the clinic, or to an island. Twenty-two services would send 2 clinicians and 10 would bring prefilled sterile syringes, rather than aspirate from bottles at the bedside.

Conclusion: FoI requests can generate a very high response rate in the UK. Many services manage a small number of patients, which would make it difficult to provide cover when a single-handed clinician is unavailable or to train a second clinician.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信