2016-2019年急性腰痛医疗保险受益人中阿片类药物、加巴喷丁类药物和非药物性疼痛治疗的趋势和差异

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1177/10775587251339917
Jane Vaillant, Richa Gairola, Jessica S Merlin, Amal N Trivedi, Theresa I Shireman, Patience M Dow
{"title":"2016-2019年急性腰痛医疗保险受益人中阿片类药物、加巴喷丁类药物和非药物性疼痛治疗的趋势和差异","authors":"Jane Vaillant, Richa Gairola, Jessica S Merlin, Amal N Trivedi, Theresa I Shireman, Patience M Dow","doi":"10.1177/10775587251339917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic therapies instead of prescription opioids as first-line treatment for many pain types, including acute low back pain (aLBP). This serial cross-sectional study describes trends in the annual prevalence of physical therapy (PT), chiropractic care, gabapentinoids, and prescription opioid receipt among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with aLBP from 2016 to 2019, overall and within key demographic, clinical, and geographic subgroups. Overall, changes in PT (5.5%-6.7%), chiropractic care (11.0%-11.7%), and gabapentinoid (9.6%-8.9%) receipt were limited, whereas prescription opioid use substantially decreased (26.2%-17.8%). Prescription opioid receipt was higher among individuals under age 65, American Indian/Alaskan Native, non-Hispanic Black/African American, and Hispanic individuals, individuals with opioid use disorder, and in Southern states, while the use of nonpharmacologic pain therapies remained low among these subgroups. It is essential to promote equitable access to multimodal and guideline-recommended approaches for aLBP management including nonpharmacologic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"426-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends and Disparities in the Use of Opioid, Gabapentinoid, and Nonpharmacologic Pain Therapies Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Low Back Pain, 2016-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Jane Vaillant, Richa Gairola, Jessica S Merlin, Amal N Trivedi, Theresa I Shireman, Patience M Dow\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775587251339917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contemporary practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic therapies instead of prescription opioids as first-line treatment for many pain types, including acute low back pain (aLBP). This serial cross-sectional study describes trends in the annual prevalence of physical therapy (PT), chiropractic care, gabapentinoids, and prescription opioid receipt among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with aLBP from 2016 to 2019, overall and within key demographic, clinical, and geographic subgroups. Overall, changes in PT (5.5%-6.7%), chiropractic care (11.0%-11.7%), and gabapentinoid (9.6%-8.9%) receipt were limited, whereas prescription opioid use substantially decreased (26.2%-17.8%). Prescription opioid receipt was higher among individuals under age 65, American Indian/Alaskan Native, non-Hispanic Black/African American, and Hispanic individuals, individuals with opioid use disorder, and in Southern states, while the use of nonpharmacologic pain therapies remained low among these subgroups. It is essential to promote equitable access to multimodal and guideline-recommended approaches for aLBP management including nonpharmacologic therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"426-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587251339917\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587251339917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代实践指南推荐非药物治疗代替处方阿片类药物作为许多疼痛类型的一线治疗,包括急性腰痛(aLBP)。本系列横断面研究描述了2016年至2019年诊断为aLBP的医疗保险受益人中物理治疗(PT)、脊椎指压治疗、加巴喷丁类药物和处方阿片类药物收据的年度流行趋势,包括总体和关键人口统计学、临床和地理亚组。总体而言,PT(5.5%-6.7%)、捏脊护理(11.0%-11.7%)和加巴喷丁类药物(9.6%-8.9%)的使用变化有限,而处方阿片类药物的使用则大幅减少(26.2%-17.8%)。处方阿片类药物收据在65岁以下、美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、非西班牙裔黑人/非洲裔美国人和西班牙裔个体、阿片类药物使用障碍个体和南部各州的个体中较高,而非药物性疼痛治疗的使用在这些亚组中仍然很低。促进公平获得多模式和指南推荐的aLBP管理方法,包括非药物治疗,是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends and Disparities in the Use of Opioid, Gabapentinoid, and Nonpharmacologic Pain Therapies Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Acute Low Back Pain, 2016-2019.

Contemporary practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic therapies instead of prescription opioids as first-line treatment for many pain types, including acute low back pain (aLBP). This serial cross-sectional study describes trends in the annual prevalence of physical therapy (PT), chiropractic care, gabapentinoids, and prescription opioid receipt among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with aLBP from 2016 to 2019, overall and within key demographic, clinical, and geographic subgroups. Overall, changes in PT (5.5%-6.7%), chiropractic care (11.0%-11.7%), and gabapentinoid (9.6%-8.9%) receipt were limited, whereas prescription opioid use substantially decreased (26.2%-17.8%). Prescription opioid receipt was higher among individuals under age 65, American Indian/Alaskan Native, non-Hispanic Black/African American, and Hispanic individuals, individuals with opioid use disorder, and in Southern states, while the use of nonpharmacologic pain therapies remained low among these subgroups. It is essential to promote equitable access to multimodal and guideline-recommended approaches for aLBP management including nonpharmacologic therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信