锥束计算机断层扫描在6秒和60秒采集:当呼吸运动存在时适应性放疗的意义。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Patricia A K Oliver, Logan Montgomery, Dal Alexander Granville
{"title":"锥束计算机断层扫描在6秒和60秒采集:当呼吸运动存在时适应性放疗的意义。","authors":"Patricia A K Oliver, Logan Montgomery, Dal Alexander Granville","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adde65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of respiratory motion during fast (~6 s) and slow (~60 s) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition modes, with a focus on implications for adaptive radiotherapy (ART).&#xD;&#xD;Methods: CBCT images are compared with 4D fan beam CT acquisitions, considering average (\"AVE\") and maximum (\"MIP\") intensity projections. Data are acquired using a respiratory motion phantom representing a human thorax with a lung tumour. A range of sup-inf motion amplitudes (3 to 11 mm) and periods (3 to 5 s) are considered. HU perturbations, target contouring implications, and dosimetric effects are considered.&#xD;&#xD;Results: Fast mode CBCT motion artefacts are more severe for larger amplitudes and longer periods. Motion artefacts are minimal in slow mode. The standard deviation of HU differences (CBCT minus AVE) in regions-of-interest encompassing the tumour are within 44 HU for slow mode, increasing up to 75 HU for fast mode. Target volumes contoured using HU thresholding on slow mode CBCTs are smaller than those on the AVE/MIP by up to 7%/29%. HU thresholding was not applied to fast mode CBCTs because motion artefacts were judged to be too severe. Gamma pass rates for dose distributions calculated on fast or slow mode CBCTs compared to the AVE are ≥ 99% (criteria: 1%, 1 mm, 10% dose threshold). Dose differences (fast mode CBCT minus AVE) are larger for larger amplitudes and longer periods, and tend toward negative values. Dose differences (slow mode CBCT minus AVE) are generally smaller and more consistent across all amplitudes and periods considered.&#xD;&#xD;Conclusions: Dosimetric perturbations resulting from motion artefacts are not severe for the amplitudes and periods considered. However, motion artefacts (especially in fast mode) have implications for image registration, target contouring, and treatment plan optimization for ART. &#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone beam computed tomography in 6- and 60-second acquisitions: implications for adaptive radiotherapy when respiratory motion is present.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia A K Oliver, Logan Montgomery, Dal Alexander Granville\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/adde65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of respiratory motion during fast (~6 s) and slow (~60 s) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition modes, with a focus on implications for adaptive radiotherapy (ART).&#xD;&#xD;Methods: CBCT images are compared with 4D fan beam CT acquisitions, considering average (\\\"AVE\\\") and maximum (\\\"MIP\\\") intensity projections. Data are acquired using a respiratory motion phantom representing a human thorax with a lung tumour. A range of sup-inf motion amplitudes (3 to 11 mm) and periods (3 to 5 s) are considered. HU perturbations, target contouring implications, and dosimetric effects are considered.&#xD;&#xD;Results: Fast mode CBCT motion artefacts are more severe for larger amplitudes and longer periods. Motion artefacts are minimal in slow mode. The standard deviation of HU differences (CBCT minus AVE) in regions-of-interest encompassing the tumour are within 44 HU for slow mode, increasing up to 75 HU for fast mode. Target volumes contoured using HU thresholding on slow mode CBCTs are smaller than those on the AVE/MIP by up to 7%/29%. HU thresholding was not applied to fast mode CBCTs because motion artefacts were judged to be too severe. Gamma pass rates for dose distributions calculated on fast or slow mode CBCTs compared to the AVE are ≥ 99% (criteria: 1%, 1 mm, 10% dose threshold). Dose differences (fast mode CBCT minus AVE) are larger for larger amplitudes and longer periods, and tend toward negative values. Dose differences (slow mode CBCT minus AVE) are generally smaller and more consistent across all amplitudes and periods considered.&#xD;&#xD;Conclusions: Dosimetric perturbations resulting from motion artefacts are not severe for the amplitudes and periods considered. However, motion artefacts (especially in fast mode) have implications for image registration, target contouring, and treatment plan optimization for ART. &#xD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adde65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adde65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究快速(~6 s)和慢速(~60 s)锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)采集模式对呼吸运动的影响,重点探讨对适应性放疗(ART)的影响。方法:将CBCT图像与四维扇束CT采集图像进行比较,考虑平均(AVE)和最大(MIP)强度投影。数据是通过一个呼吸运动假体获得的,它代表了一个患有肺肿瘤的人的胸腔。一个范围的振幅(3至11毫米)和周期(3至5秒)被考虑。考虑了HU扰动、靶轮廓影响和剂量效应。结果:快速模式CBCT运动伪影在较大振幅和较长周期下更为严重。在慢速模式下,运动伪影最小。慢速模式下,肿瘤周围感兴趣区域的HU差异(CBCT减去AVE)的标准差在44 HU以内,快速模式下增加到75 HU。在慢模式cbct上使用HU阈值绘制的目标体积比在AVE/MIP上绘制的目标体积小7%/29%。HU阈值不应用于快速模式cbct,因为运动伪影被认为过于严重。与AVE相比,在快或慢模式cbct上计算的剂量分布γ通过率≥99%(标准:1%,1mm, 10%剂量阈值)。剂量差(快速模式CBCT减去AVE)在较大的振幅和较长的周期内更大,并趋向于负值。在考虑的所有振幅和周期内,剂量差异(慢模式CBCT减去AVE)通常更小,更一致。结论:在考虑的振幅和周期内,由运动伪影引起的剂量学扰动并不严重。然而,运动伪影(特别是在快速模式下)对图像配准、目标轮廓和ART治疗方案优化具有影响。& # xD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cone beam computed tomography in 6- and 60-second acquisitions: implications for adaptive radiotherapy when respiratory motion is present.

Purpose: To investigate the effects of respiratory motion during fast (~6 s) and slow (~60 s) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition modes, with a focus on implications for adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Methods: CBCT images are compared with 4D fan beam CT acquisitions, considering average ("AVE") and maximum ("MIP") intensity projections. Data are acquired using a respiratory motion phantom representing a human thorax with a lung tumour. A range of sup-inf motion amplitudes (3 to 11 mm) and periods (3 to 5 s) are considered. HU perturbations, target contouring implications, and dosimetric effects are considered. Results: Fast mode CBCT motion artefacts are more severe for larger amplitudes and longer periods. Motion artefacts are minimal in slow mode. The standard deviation of HU differences (CBCT minus AVE) in regions-of-interest encompassing the tumour are within 44 HU for slow mode, increasing up to 75 HU for fast mode. Target volumes contoured using HU thresholding on slow mode CBCTs are smaller than those on the AVE/MIP by up to 7%/29%. HU thresholding was not applied to fast mode CBCTs because motion artefacts were judged to be too severe. Gamma pass rates for dose distributions calculated on fast or slow mode CBCTs compared to the AVE are ≥ 99% (criteria: 1%, 1 mm, 10% dose threshold). Dose differences (fast mode CBCT minus AVE) are larger for larger amplitudes and longer periods, and tend toward negative values. Dose differences (slow mode CBCT minus AVE) are generally smaller and more consistent across all amplitudes and periods considered. Conclusions: Dosimetric perturbations resulting from motion artefacts are not severe for the amplitudes and periods considered. However, motion artefacts (especially in fast mode) have implications for image registration, target contouring, and treatment plan optimization for ART. .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信