三级医院急诊科年龄与住院时间的关系:一项回顾性观察研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Prachur Khandelwal, Yohei Okada, Yilin Ning, Zhongxun Hu, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Kenneth Boon Kiat Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong
{"title":"三级医院急诊科年龄与住院时间的关系:一项回顾性观察研究","authors":"Prachur Khandelwal, Yohei Okada, Yilin Ning, Zhongxun Hu, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Kenneth Boon Kiat Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older patients' attendances at EDs are rising. There are concerns that these individuals have prolonged stays, which have been shown to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. We assessed the length of stay in older patients in a single ED in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational retrospective study of ED attendances between 2017 and 2019 at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) using the SGH ED database. The primary outcome was ED length of stay, with prolonged stay defined as 4 hours or more. The association between age (categorised into 18-44, 45-64, 65-84 and 85+) and length of stay was analysed using a mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for variables like gender, ethnicity and triage acuity. Associations are expressed as adjusted ORs (AOR) with 95% CI. A subgroup analysis was performed for all considered variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>391 171 patients qualified for analysis; median age 57 years (IQR 37-70) and 51.5% male. The median length of stay increased across age categories (age 18-44, 3.53 hours; 45-64, 4.04 hours; 65-84, 4.32 hours; and 85+, 4.46 hours). Using patients aged 18-44 as a reference, the AORs for prolonged length of stay by age group were 45-64 AOR 1.17 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.21), 65-84 AOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.30) and 85+ AOR 1.25 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.31). In the subgroup analysis, there was no association between age and length of stay for patients admitted, having multiple comorbidities, having blood tests or having high acuity scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this Singaporean tertiary hospital, older patients had increased median stays and were more likely to stay in the ED for more than 4 hours. However, this did not apply in some subpopulations. This potentially suggests the need for systematic changes in discharge planning and triaging to reduce prolonged stays and their consequences for older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between age and length of stay in the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Prachur Khandelwal, Yohei Okada, Yilin Ning, Zhongxun Hu, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Kenneth Boon Kiat Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-214299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older patients' attendances at EDs are rising. There are concerns that these individuals have prolonged stays, which have been shown to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. We assessed the length of stay in older patients in a single ED in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational retrospective study of ED attendances between 2017 and 2019 at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) using the SGH ED database. The primary outcome was ED length of stay, with prolonged stay defined as 4 hours or more. The association between age (categorised into 18-44, 45-64, 65-84 and 85+) and length of stay was analysed using a mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for variables like gender, ethnicity and triage acuity. Associations are expressed as adjusted ORs (AOR) with 95% CI. A subgroup analysis was performed for all considered variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>391 171 patients qualified for analysis; median age 57 years (IQR 37-70) and 51.5% male. The median length of stay increased across age categories (age 18-44, 3.53 hours; 45-64, 4.04 hours; 65-84, 4.32 hours; and 85+, 4.46 hours). Using patients aged 18-44 as a reference, the AORs for prolonged length of stay by age group were 45-64 AOR 1.17 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.21), 65-84 AOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.30) and 85+ AOR 1.25 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.31). In the subgroup analysis, there was no association between age and length of stay for patients admitted, having multiple comorbidities, having blood tests or having high acuity scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this Singaporean tertiary hospital, older patients had increased median stays and were more likely to stay in the ED for more than 4 hours. However, this did not apply in some subpopulations. This potentially suggests the need for systematic changes in discharge planning and triaging to reduce prolonged stays and their consequences for older patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年患者在急诊科的就诊率正在上升。人们担心这些人的住院时间过长,这已被证明与不良临床结果有关。我们评估了新加坡单个急诊科老年患者的住院时间。方法:这是一项观察性回顾性研究,使用新加坡总医院(SGH)的ED数据库,对2017年至2019年在新加坡总医院(SGH)的ED就诊情况进行分析。主要预后指标是ED的住院时间,住院时间延长定义为4小时或更长。年龄(分为18-44岁、45-64岁、65-84岁和85岁以上)与住院时间之间的关系使用混合效应逻辑回归分析,调整了性别、种族和分诊灵敏度等变量。相关性以调整后的or (AOR)表示,95% CI。对所有考虑的变量进行亚组分析。结果:391 171例患者符合分析条件;中位年龄57岁(IQR 37-70), 51.5%为男性。住院时间的中位数在各个年龄段都有所增加(18-44岁,3.53小时;45-64, 4.04小时;65-84, 4.32小时;85岁以上,4.46小时)。以18-44岁患者为参照,各年龄组延长住院时间的AOR分别为45-64岁AOR 1.17 (95% CI 1.13 ~ 1.21)、65-84岁AOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.21 ~ 1.30)和85+ AOR 1.25 (95% CI 1.18 ~ 1.31)。在亚组分析中,对于有多种合并症、有血液检查或有高视力评分的患者,年龄和住院时间之间没有关联。结论:在这家新加坡三级医院,老年患者的中位数住院时间增加,并且更有可能在急诊科停留超过4小时。然而,这并不适用于某些亚群。这可能表明需要系统地改变出院计划和分诊,以减少延长住院时间及其对老年患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between age and length of stay in the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective observational study.

Background: Older patients' attendances at EDs are rising. There are concerns that these individuals have prolonged stays, which have been shown to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. We assessed the length of stay in older patients in a single ED in Singapore.

Methods: This was an observational retrospective study of ED attendances between 2017 and 2019 at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) using the SGH ED database. The primary outcome was ED length of stay, with prolonged stay defined as 4 hours or more. The association between age (categorised into 18-44, 45-64, 65-84 and 85+) and length of stay was analysed using a mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for variables like gender, ethnicity and triage acuity. Associations are expressed as adjusted ORs (AOR) with 95% CI. A subgroup analysis was performed for all considered variables.

Results: 391 171 patients qualified for analysis; median age 57 years (IQR 37-70) and 51.5% male. The median length of stay increased across age categories (age 18-44, 3.53 hours; 45-64, 4.04 hours; 65-84, 4.32 hours; and 85+, 4.46 hours). Using patients aged 18-44 as a reference, the AORs for prolonged length of stay by age group were 45-64 AOR 1.17 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.21), 65-84 AOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.30) and 85+ AOR 1.25 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.31). In the subgroup analysis, there was no association between age and length of stay for patients admitted, having multiple comorbidities, having blood tests or having high acuity scores.

Conclusion: In this Singaporean tertiary hospital, older patients had increased median stays and were more likely to stay in the ED for more than 4 hours. However, this did not apply in some subpopulations. This potentially suggests the need for systematic changes in discharge planning and triaging to reduce prolonged stays and their consequences for older patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信