转型中的田野调查:在复合形式的痛苦中重新思考焦虑、团结和本体论

Megan A. Carney
{"title":"转型中的田野调查:在复合形式的痛苦中重新思考焦虑、团结和本体论","authors":"Megan A. Carney","doi":"10.1002/fea2.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drawing on preliminary research in Italy in the months following Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the gradual lifting of pandemic-related public health measures, this essay explores the widespread economic, political, and environmental anxieties as well as calls for solidarity that were circulating at this time and their implications for ethnographers in attempting to “make sense” of sociocultural phenomena in a world that feels “unhinged.” From these swirling anxieties, hegemonic framings of “reality” by state actors contrast significantly with the lived experiences of the working class and reveal the function of <i>salvage realism</i> in reproducing racial capitalism. Following recent work in anthropology on the unhinged and affective possibilities in troubled times, I argue that these dynamics demand deeper anthropological engagement with theories that continue to be marginalized by the discipline, including from Black and Indigenous scholarship. These dynamics also raise important questions regarding the realities and temporalities of fieldwork and the onto-epistemological frames that inform anthropological research processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fea2.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fieldwork in transition: Rethinking anxieties, solidarities, and ontologies amid compounding forms of distress\",\"authors\":\"Megan A. Carney\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fea2.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Drawing on preliminary research in Italy in the months following Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the gradual lifting of pandemic-related public health measures, this essay explores the widespread economic, political, and environmental anxieties as well as calls for solidarity that were circulating at this time and their implications for ethnographers in attempting to “make sense” of sociocultural phenomena in a world that feels “unhinged.” From these swirling anxieties, hegemonic framings of “reality” by state actors contrast significantly with the lived experiences of the working class and reveal the function of <i>salvage realism</i> in reproducing racial capitalism. Following recent work in anthropology on the unhinged and affective possibilities in troubled times, I argue that these dynamics demand deeper anthropological engagement with theories that continue to be marginalized by the discipline, including from Black and Indigenous scholarship. These dynamics also raise important questions regarding the realities and temporalities of fieldwork and the onto-epistemological frames that inform anthropological research processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist anthropology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fea2.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.70000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰和逐渐解除与大流行相关的公共卫生措施后的几个月里,在意大利进行了初步研究,本文探讨了当时流传的广泛的经济、政治和环境焦虑,以及对团结的呼吁,以及它们对民族志学家在一个感觉“精神错乱”的世界里试图“理解”社会文化现象的影响。从这些令人不安的焦虑中,国家行动者对“现实”的霸权框架与工人阶级的生活经验形成鲜明对比,并揭示了救助性现实主义在再现种族资本主义中的作用。在人类学最近对混乱时期精神错乱和情感可能性的研究之后,我认为这些动态需要更深层次的人类学参与,这些理论继续被学科边缘化,包括黑人和土著学者。这些动态也提出了关于实地考察的现实性和时间性以及告知人类学研究过程的本体-认识论框架的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fieldwork in transition: Rethinking anxieties, solidarities, and ontologies amid compounding forms of distress

Drawing on preliminary research in Italy in the months following Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the gradual lifting of pandemic-related public health measures, this essay explores the widespread economic, political, and environmental anxieties as well as calls for solidarity that were circulating at this time and their implications for ethnographers in attempting to “make sense” of sociocultural phenomena in a world that feels “unhinged.” From these swirling anxieties, hegemonic framings of “reality” by state actors contrast significantly with the lived experiences of the working class and reveal the function of salvage realism in reproducing racial capitalism. Following recent work in anthropology on the unhinged and affective possibilities in troubled times, I argue that these dynamics demand deeper anthropological engagement with theories that continue to be marginalized by the discipline, including from Black and Indigenous scholarship. These dynamics also raise important questions regarding the realities and temporalities of fieldwork and the onto-epistemological frames that inform anthropological research processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信