地塞米松/长春新碱脉冲显著降低儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病维持治疗期间6MP/MTX的给药剂量

Valérie de Haas, Esmee Slot , Laura van den Berg , Rana Dandis, Hester de Groot-Kruseman, Rob Pieters
{"title":"地塞米松/长春新碱脉冲显著降低儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病维持治疗期间6MP/MTX的给药剂量","authors":"Valérie de Haas,&nbsp;Esmee Slot ,&nbsp;Laura van den Berg ,&nbsp;Rana Dandis,&nbsp;Hester de Groot-Kruseman,&nbsp;Rob Pieters","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2025.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Maintenance therapy with 6-Mercaptopurine (6MP) and Methotrexate (MTX) with or without dexamethasone (DEX) and vincristine (VCR) pulses, is crucial in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Dosing adjustments are based on white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts (ANC) to balance relapse and infection risks. We investigated if clinicians adjust doses for high versus low WBC/ANC and how pulses affect WBC/ANC and dose intensity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Analyzing WBC/ANC and 6MP/MTX doses in DCOG-ALL11 (ALL11) and ALLtogether (A2G) patients, we assessed clinical compliance with dose-adjustment guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 2901 WBC checkpoints in ALL11 and 3806 in A2G (validation cohort), clinicians were non-compliant with dose-adjustment guidelines in 44 % (ALL11) and 31 % (A2G) of cases.</div><div>At checkpoints where no-compliance was observed, WBC/ANC levels were most frequently above target (85.1 % in ALL11 and 87.7 % in A2G) and rarely below (6.4 % in ALL11 and 6.7 % in A2G, p &lt; 0.001).Median WBC/ANC levels often exceeded recommendations (3.1 and 1.6 ×109/L, respectively) and patients receiving DEX/VCR pulses had a lower median dose 6MP / MTX (60 %) than those without pulses (100 % ALL11, 75 % A2G; P &lt; 0.001), resulting in lower absolute doses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, clinicians are less likely to adjust doses properly when WBC/ANC levels exceed targets, reducing 6MP/MTX dose intensity. DEX/VCR pulses significantly lower 6MP/MTX doses, possibly influencing their benefit in ALL maintenance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexamethasone/vincristine pulses significantly reduce administered doses of 6MP/MTX during maintenance therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia\",\"authors\":\"Valérie de Haas,&nbsp;Esmee Slot ,&nbsp;Laura van den Berg ,&nbsp;Rana Dandis,&nbsp;Hester de Groot-Kruseman,&nbsp;Rob Pieters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcped.2025.100243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Maintenance therapy with 6-Mercaptopurine (6MP) and Methotrexate (MTX) with or without dexamethasone (DEX) and vincristine (VCR) pulses, is crucial in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Dosing adjustments are based on white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts (ANC) to balance relapse and infection risks. We investigated if clinicians adjust doses for high versus low WBC/ANC and how pulses affect WBC/ANC and dose intensity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Analyzing WBC/ANC and 6MP/MTX doses in DCOG-ALL11 (ALL11) and ALLtogether (A2G) patients, we assessed clinical compliance with dose-adjustment guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 2901 WBC checkpoints in ALL11 and 3806 in A2G (validation cohort), clinicians were non-compliant with dose-adjustment guidelines in 44 % (ALL11) and 31 % (A2G) of cases.</div><div>At checkpoints where no-compliance was observed, WBC/ANC levels were most frequently above target (85.1 % in ALL11 and 87.7 % in A2G) and rarely below (6.4 % in ALL11 and 6.7 % in A2G, p &lt; 0.001).Median WBC/ANC levels often exceeded recommendations (3.1 and 1.6 ×109/L, respectively) and patients receiving DEX/VCR pulses had a lower median dose 6MP / MTX (60 %) than those without pulses (100 % ALL11, 75 % A2G; P &lt; 0.001), resulting in lower absolute doses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, clinicians are less likely to adjust doses properly when WBC/ANC levels exceed targets, reducing 6MP/MTX dose intensity. DEX/VCR pulses significantly lower 6MP/MTX doses, possibly influencing their benefit in ALL maintenance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X25000315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X25000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:6-巯基嘌呤(6MP)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合或不联合地塞米松(DEX)和长春新碱(VCR)脉冲维持治疗对于儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)至关重要。剂量调整基于白细胞(WBC)和中性粒细胞计数(ANC),以平衡复发和感染风险。我们调查了临床医生是否会根据WBC/ANC的高低调整剂量,以及脉冲如何影响WBC/ANC和剂量强度。方法分析DCOG-ALL11 (ALL11)和ALLtogether (A2G)患者的WBC/ANC和6MP/MTX剂量,评估临床对剂量调整指南的依从性。结果在ALL11的2901个WBC检查点和A2G(验证队列)的3806个检查点中,44. % (ALL11)和31. % (A2G)的临床医生不遵守剂量调整指南。在观察到不合规的检查点,WBC/ANC水平最常高于目标(ALL11为85.1 %,A2G为87.7 %),很少低于目标(ALL11为6.4 %,A2G为6.7 %,p <; 0.001)。中位WBC/ANC水平经常超过推荐值(分别为3.1和1.6 ×109/L),接受DEX/VCR脉冲治疗的患者的中位剂量6MP / MTX(60 %)低于未接受脉冲治疗的患者(100 % ALL11, 75 % A2G;P <; 0.001),导致较低的绝对剂量。结论当WBC/ANC水平超过目标时,临床医生不太可能适当调整剂量,降低了6MP/MTX的剂量强度。DEX/VCR脉冲显著降低6MP/MTX剂量,可能影响其在ALL维持中的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dexamethasone/vincristine pulses significantly reduce administered doses of 6MP/MTX during maintenance therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Background

Maintenance therapy with 6-Mercaptopurine (6MP) and Methotrexate (MTX) with or without dexamethasone (DEX) and vincristine (VCR) pulses, is crucial in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Dosing adjustments are based on white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts (ANC) to balance relapse and infection risks. We investigated if clinicians adjust doses for high versus low WBC/ANC and how pulses affect WBC/ANC and dose intensity.

Methods

Analyzing WBC/ANC and 6MP/MTX doses in DCOG-ALL11 (ALL11) and ALLtogether (A2G) patients, we assessed clinical compliance with dose-adjustment guidelines.

Results

Across 2901 WBC checkpoints in ALL11 and 3806 in A2G (validation cohort), clinicians were non-compliant with dose-adjustment guidelines in 44 % (ALL11) and 31 % (A2G) of cases.
At checkpoints where no-compliance was observed, WBC/ANC levels were most frequently above target (85.1 % in ALL11 and 87.7 % in A2G) and rarely below (6.4 % in ALL11 and 6.7 % in A2G, p < 0.001).Median WBC/ANC levels often exceeded recommendations (3.1 and 1.6 ×109/L, respectively) and patients receiving DEX/VCR pulses had a lower median dose 6MP / MTX (60 %) than those without pulses (100 % ALL11, 75 % A2G; P < 0.001), resulting in lower absolute doses.

Conclusions

In conclusion, clinicians are less likely to adjust doses properly when WBC/ANC levels exceed targets, reducing 6MP/MTX dose intensity. DEX/VCR pulses significantly lower 6MP/MTX doses, possibly influencing their benefit in ALL maintenance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信