模型残差作为盾牌:保护智能电网免受中毒攻击的两级公式

IF 8.9 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Tung-Wei Lin;Padmaksha Roy;Yi Zeng;Ming Jin;Ruoxi Jia;Chen-Ching Liu;Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
{"title":"模型残差作为盾牌:保护智能电网免受中毒攻击的两级公式","authors":"Tung-Wei Lin;Padmaksha Roy;Yi Zeng;Ming Jin;Ruoxi Jia;Chen-Ching Liu;Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli","doi":"10.1109/JIOT.2025.3575005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advancement of smart grids presents both vast opportunities and heightened cybersecurity risks. Data-driven defense mechanisms, though designed as a shield against these threats, can fall prey to poisoning attacks. We delve into regression settings, underscoring the imperative to fortify defenses against a spectrum of poison ratios, notably those above 0.5—an issue scarcely addressed in prior studies. Recognizing the susceptibilities of smart grids and their manipulable sensors, we exploit the very intent of poisoning attacks, compromising model accuracy, as our defense mechanism. Our proposed two-level optimization framework discerns between poisoned and authentic data based on model residuals, outperforming or matching existing methods in 72% to 77% of precision and 75% to 80% of recalls across various poisoning attacks, poison ratios, and datasets. Once the authentic data are identified, the trained model is adaptable for a variety of applications. Comprehensive evaluations on different smart grid datasets, pitted against myriad poisoning schemes, validate our methodology’s edge over existing methods. We also shed light on the implications of model misspecification originating from temporal auto-correlation, a common feature in Internet of Things and smart grid data.","PeriodicalId":54347,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Internet of Things Journal","volume":"12 15","pages":"31112-31125"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model Residuals as Shields: A Two-Level Formulation to Defend Smart Grids From Poisoning Attacks\",\"authors\":\"Tung-Wei Lin;Padmaksha Roy;Yi Zeng;Ming Jin;Ruoxi Jia;Chen-Ching Liu;Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JIOT.2025.3575005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The advancement of smart grids presents both vast opportunities and heightened cybersecurity risks. Data-driven defense mechanisms, though designed as a shield against these threats, can fall prey to poisoning attacks. We delve into regression settings, underscoring the imperative to fortify defenses against a spectrum of poison ratios, notably those above 0.5—an issue scarcely addressed in prior studies. Recognizing the susceptibilities of smart grids and their manipulable sensors, we exploit the very intent of poisoning attacks, compromising model accuracy, as our defense mechanism. Our proposed two-level optimization framework discerns between poisoned and authentic data based on model residuals, outperforming or matching existing methods in 72% to 77% of precision and 75% to 80% of recalls across various poisoning attacks, poison ratios, and datasets. Once the authentic data are identified, the trained model is adaptable for a variety of applications. Comprehensive evaluations on different smart grid datasets, pitted against myriad poisoning schemes, validate our methodology’s edge over existing methods. We also shed light on the implications of model misspecification originating from temporal auto-correlation, a common feature in Internet of Things and smart grid data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Internet of Things Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 15\",\"pages\":\"31112-31125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Internet of Things Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11017645/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Internet of Things Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11017645/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智能电网的发展既带来了巨大的机遇,也加剧了网络安全风险。数据驱动的防御机制虽然被设计为抵御这些威胁的屏障,但也可能成为中毒攻击的牺牲品。我们深入研究了回归设置,强调了加强对一系列中毒比率的防御的必要性,特别是那些高于0.5的问题,这在以前的研究中几乎没有解决过。认识到智能电网及其可操纵传感器的敏感性,我们利用中毒攻击的意图,损害模型的准确性,作为我们的防御机制。我们提出的两级优化框架根据模型残差区分有毒数据和真实数据,在各种中毒攻击、中毒比例和数据集上,其精确度为72%至77%,召回率为75%至80%,优于或匹配现有方法。一旦确定了真实数据,训练模型就可以适应各种应用程序。对不同智能电网数据集的综合评估,与无数的中毒计划相抗衡,验证了我们的方法比现有方法的优势。我们还阐明了由时间自相关引起的模型错误规范的影响,这是物联网和智能电网数据的常见特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model Residuals as Shields: A Two-Level Formulation to Defend Smart Grids From Poisoning Attacks
The advancement of smart grids presents both vast opportunities and heightened cybersecurity risks. Data-driven defense mechanisms, though designed as a shield against these threats, can fall prey to poisoning attacks. We delve into regression settings, underscoring the imperative to fortify defenses against a spectrum of poison ratios, notably those above 0.5—an issue scarcely addressed in prior studies. Recognizing the susceptibilities of smart grids and their manipulable sensors, we exploit the very intent of poisoning attacks, compromising model accuracy, as our defense mechanism. Our proposed two-level optimization framework discerns between poisoned and authentic data based on model residuals, outperforming or matching existing methods in 72% to 77% of precision and 75% to 80% of recalls across various poisoning attacks, poison ratios, and datasets. Once the authentic data are identified, the trained model is adaptable for a variety of applications. Comprehensive evaluations on different smart grid datasets, pitted against myriad poisoning schemes, validate our methodology’s edge over existing methods. We also shed light on the implications of model misspecification originating from temporal auto-correlation, a common feature in Internet of Things and smart grid data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
IEEE Internet of Things Journal Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1982
期刊介绍: The EEE Internet of Things (IoT) Journal publishes articles and review articles covering various aspects of IoT, including IoT system architecture, IoT enabling technologies, IoT communication and networking protocols such as network coding, and IoT services and applications. Topics encompass IoT's impacts on sensor technologies, big data management, and future internet design for applications like smart cities and smart homes. Fields of interest include IoT architecture such as things-centric, data-centric, service-oriented IoT architecture; IoT enabling technologies and systematic integration such as sensor technologies, big sensor data management, and future Internet design for IoT; IoT services, applications, and test-beds such as IoT service middleware, IoT application programming interface (API), IoT application design, and IoT trials/experiments; IoT standardization activities and technology development in different standard development organizations (SDO) such as IEEE, IETF, ITU, 3GPP, ETSI, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信