Sofie Breuls, Astrid Blondeel, Marieke Wuyts, Geert M Verleden, Robin Vos, Wim Janssens, Thierry Troosters, Heleen Demeyer
{"title":"肺移植受者1年体育训练计划:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Sofie Breuls, Astrid Blondeel, Marieke Wuyts, Geert M Verleden, Robin Vos, Wim Janssens, Thierry Troosters, Heleen Demeyer","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Most lung transplant (LTX) recipients do not meet physical activity (PA) guidelines. Interventions are needed as long-term inactivity is related to morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effect of a telecoaching programme on objectively measured PA in LTX recipients. Methods Inactive patients (<7500 steps/day, n=90) were randomised into a light or intensive version of a 1-year PA telecoaching programme. The light intervention consisted of a step counter and a minimal version of the smartphone application. Patients randomised to the intensive intervention discussed PA barriers and goals, received a step counter, a patient-tailored smartphone application and supportive coaching calls. PA (primary outcome, assessed by an accelerometer), physical function, quality of life and symptoms were measured at baseline, after 3 months (primary endpoint) and 1 year. Mixed model analyses were used to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention compared with the light intervention. Results Between-group difference in change after 3 months and 1 year was observed as mean (CI) 750 (−96 to 1596) (p=0.08) and 680 (−244 to 1605) steps per day (p=0.15), 10 (−0.5 to 20) and 10 (−1 to 22) min of total moving time (walking, taking stairs and cycling) (both p=0.07) and −3 (−6 to 0) (p=0.07) and −6 (−10 to −2) (p=0.002) of sedentary time, all in favour of the intervention group. Other outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusion PA tends to improve in LTX recipients by following an intensive telecoaching programme compared with a light programme. Trial registration number [NCT04122768][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Data cannot be shared publicly because of patient confidentiality according to the Belgian law. New analyses are available on reasonable request from the author or UZ Leuven ethical committee’ (ec@uzleuven.be). [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04122768&atom=%2Fthoraxjnl%2Fearly%2F2025%2F05%2F29%2Fthorax-2024-222896.atom","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1-year physical activity coaching programme in lung transplant recipients: an RCT\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Breuls, Astrid Blondeel, Marieke Wuyts, Geert M Verleden, Robin Vos, Wim Janssens, Thierry Troosters, Heleen Demeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2024-222896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Most lung transplant (LTX) recipients do not meet physical activity (PA) guidelines. Interventions are needed as long-term inactivity is related to morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effect of a telecoaching programme on objectively measured PA in LTX recipients. Methods Inactive patients (<7500 steps/day, n=90) were randomised into a light or intensive version of a 1-year PA telecoaching programme. The light intervention consisted of a step counter and a minimal version of the smartphone application. Patients randomised to the intensive intervention discussed PA barriers and goals, received a step counter, a patient-tailored smartphone application and supportive coaching calls. PA (primary outcome, assessed by an accelerometer), physical function, quality of life and symptoms were measured at baseline, after 3 months (primary endpoint) and 1 year. Mixed model analyses were used to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention compared with the light intervention. Results Between-group difference in change after 3 months and 1 year was observed as mean (CI) 750 (−96 to 1596) (p=0.08) and 680 (−244 to 1605) steps per day (p=0.15), 10 (−0.5 to 20) and 10 (−1 to 22) min of total moving time (walking, taking stairs and cycling) (both p=0.07) and −3 (−6 to 0) (p=0.07) and −6 (−10 to −2) (p=0.002) of sedentary time, all in favour of the intervention group. Other outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusion PA tends to improve in LTX recipients by following an intensive telecoaching programme compared with a light programme. Trial registration number [NCT04122768][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Data cannot be shared publicly because of patient confidentiality according to the Belgian law. New analyses are available on reasonable request from the author or UZ Leuven ethical committee’ (ec@uzleuven.be). [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04122768&atom=%2Fthoraxjnl%2Fearly%2F2025%2F05%2F29%2Fthorax-2024-222896.atom\",\"PeriodicalId\":23284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thorax\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thorax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222896\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
1-year physical activity coaching programme in lung transplant recipients: an RCT
Introduction Most lung transplant (LTX) recipients do not meet physical activity (PA) guidelines. Interventions are needed as long-term inactivity is related to morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effect of a telecoaching programme on objectively measured PA in LTX recipients. Methods Inactive patients (<7500 steps/day, n=90) were randomised into a light or intensive version of a 1-year PA telecoaching programme. The light intervention consisted of a step counter and a minimal version of the smartphone application. Patients randomised to the intensive intervention discussed PA barriers and goals, received a step counter, a patient-tailored smartphone application and supportive coaching calls. PA (primary outcome, assessed by an accelerometer), physical function, quality of life and symptoms were measured at baseline, after 3 months (primary endpoint) and 1 year. Mixed model analyses were used to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention compared with the light intervention. Results Between-group difference in change after 3 months and 1 year was observed as mean (CI) 750 (−96 to 1596) (p=0.08) and 680 (−244 to 1605) steps per day (p=0.15), 10 (−0.5 to 20) and 10 (−1 to 22) min of total moving time (walking, taking stairs and cycling) (both p=0.07) and −3 (−6 to 0) (p=0.07) and −6 (−10 to −2) (p=0.002) of sedentary time, all in favour of the intervention group. Other outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusion PA tends to improve in LTX recipients by following an intensive telecoaching programme compared with a light programme. Trial registration number [NCT04122768][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. Data cannot be shared publicly because of patient confidentiality according to the Belgian law. New analyses are available on reasonable request from the author or UZ Leuven ethical committee’ (ec@uzleuven.be). [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04122768&atom=%2Fthoraxjnl%2Fearly%2F2025%2F05%2F29%2Fthorax-2024-222896.atom
期刊介绍:
Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.