局部注射曲安奈德治疗炎症性痤疮:剂量疗效的比较研究和一种新型注射辅助装置的研究,使局部治疗能够自我管理。

IF 3.9
Lyra B Olson, Callie M Roberts, Sunil S Dhawan, Ann Mazor Reed, Eduardo Weiss, Martin Zaiac, Justin M Ko, Arash Mostaghimi
{"title":"局部注射曲安奈德治疗炎症性痤疮:剂量疗效的比较研究和一种新型注射辅助装置的研究,使局部治疗能够自我管理。","authors":"Lyra B Olson, Callie M Roberts, Sunil S Dhawan, Ann Mazor Reed, Eduardo Weiss, Martin Zaiac, Justin M Ko, Arash Mostaghimi","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acne is the most common dermatologic condition in the U.S., but few treatments work for individual lesions. One effective spot treatment is an injection of low dose steroid into the inflammatory lesion by a dermatologist or other provider. However, this treatment is not readily available to most patients given limited access to timely in-office injections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>First, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone injection for inflammatory acne delivered by <i>via</i> self-injection with a novel injection assistance device versus standard provider-delivered intralesional injection. Second, to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at 0.1% versus 0.2%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sequentially enrolling, open label arms of study were performed across two clinical trials (NCT06170593, NCT06186596). The first two arms compared standard provider injections to device-assisted patient-administered injections of 0.1% triamcinolone into inflammatory acne lesions. A third arm was enrolled to compare efficacy of 0.1% vs. 0.2% triamcinolone delivered <i>via</i> self-injections as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-administered injections showed comparable safety and efficacy to provider-administered injections. Patients with more severe lesions reported improved lesion resolution at the higher 0.2% triamcinolone dose. There were no adverse events in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the feasibility of self-administered, provider-prescribed intralesional treatments for inflammatory acne. Home administration could expedite lesion resolution and reduce scarring risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2504656"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intralesional triamcinolone for inflammatory acne: a comparative study of dose efficacy and investigation of a novel injection assistance device to enable self-administration of intralesional therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Lyra B Olson, Callie M Roberts, Sunil S Dhawan, Ann Mazor Reed, Eduardo Weiss, Martin Zaiac, Justin M Ko, Arash Mostaghimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acne is the most common dermatologic condition in the U.S., but few treatments work for individual lesions. One effective spot treatment is an injection of low dose steroid into the inflammatory lesion by a dermatologist or other provider. However, this treatment is not readily available to most patients given limited access to timely in-office injections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>First, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone injection for inflammatory acne delivered by <i>via</i> self-injection with a novel injection assistance device versus standard provider-delivered intralesional injection. Second, to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at 0.1% versus 0.2%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sequentially enrolling, open label arms of study were performed across two clinical trials (NCT06170593, NCT06186596). The first two arms compared standard provider injections to device-assisted patient-administered injections of 0.1% triamcinolone into inflammatory acne lesions. A third arm was enrolled to compare efficacy of 0.1% vs. 0.2% triamcinolone delivered <i>via</i> self-injections as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-administered injections showed comparable safety and efficacy to provider-administered injections. Patients with more severe lesions reported improved lesion resolution at the higher 0.2% triamcinolone dose. There were no adverse events in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the feasibility of self-administered, provider-prescribed intralesional treatments for inflammatory acne. Home administration could expedite lesion resolution and reduce scarring risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2504656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:痤疮是最常见的皮肤病在美国,但很少有治疗工作的个别病变。一种有效的局部治疗是由皮肤科医生或其他提供者向炎症部位注射低剂量类固醇。然而,由于无法及时获得办公室注射,大多数患者并不容易获得这种治疗。目的:首先,评估曲安奈德局部注射治疗炎症性痤疮的安全性和有效性,曲安奈德局部注射是通过一种新型的注射辅助装置自行注射,而不是标准的由供应商提供的局部注射。第二,比较0.1%和0.2%局部注射曲安奈德的疗效和安全性。方法:在两项临床试验(NCT06170593、NCT06186596)中进行了三个顺序入组的开放标签研究。前两组比较了标准提供者注射和器械辅助患者注射0.1%曲安奈德到炎性痤疮病变。第三组纳入比较0.1%和0.2%自行注射曲安奈德的疗效,根据患者报告的结果进行评估。结果:患者给予的注射显示出与提供者给予的注射相当的安全性和有效性。较严重病变的患者报告在较高的0.2%曲安奈德剂量下病变消退改善。两组均无不良事件发生。结论:本研究支持炎症性痤疮患者自行给药、医生处方局部治疗的可行性。家庭给药可加速病变消退,减少瘢痕形成风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intralesional triamcinolone for inflammatory acne: a comparative study of dose efficacy and investigation of a novel injection assistance device to enable self-administration of intralesional therapy.

Background: Acne is the most common dermatologic condition in the U.S., but few treatments work for individual lesions. One effective spot treatment is an injection of low dose steroid into the inflammatory lesion by a dermatologist or other provider. However, this treatment is not readily available to most patients given limited access to timely in-office injections.

Objective: First, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone injection for inflammatory acne delivered by via self-injection with a novel injection assistance device versus standard provider-delivered intralesional injection. Second, to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at 0.1% versus 0.2%.

Methods: Three sequentially enrolling, open label arms of study were performed across two clinical trials (NCT06170593, NCT06186596). The first two arms compared standard provider injections to device-assisted patient-administered injections of 0.1% triamcinolone into inflammatory acne lesions. A third arm was enrolled to compare efficacy of 0.1% vs. 0.2% triamcinolone delivered via self-injections as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.

Results: Patient-administered injections showed comparable safety and efficacy to provider-administered injections. Patients with more severe lesions reported improved lesion resolution at the higher 0.2% triamcinolone dose. There were no adverse events in any group.

Conclusion: This study supports the feasibility of self-administered, provider-prescribed intralesional treatments for inflammatory acne. Home administration could expedite lesion resolution and reduce scarring risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信