Lyra B Olson, Callie M Roberts, Sunil S Dhawan, Ann Mazor Reed, Eduardo Weiss, Martin Zaiac, Justin M Ko, Arash Mostaghimi
{"title":"局部注射曲安奈德治疗炎症性痤疮:剂量疗效的比较研究和一种新型注射辅助装置的研究,使局部治疗能够自我管理。","authors":"Lyra B Olson, Callie M Roberts, Sunil S Dhawan, Ann Mazor Reed, Eduardo Weiss, Martin Zaiac, Justin M Ko, Arash Mostaghimi","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acne is the most common dermatologic condition in the U.S., but few treatments work for individual lesions. One effective spot treatment is an injection of low dose steroid into the inflammatory lesion by a dermatologist or other provider. However, this treatment is not readily available to most patients given limited access to timely in-office injections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>First, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone injection for inflammatory acne delivered by <i>via</i> self-injection with a novel injection assistance device versus standard provider-delivered intralesional injection. Second, to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at 0.1% versus 0.2%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sequentially enrolling, open label arms of study were performed across two clinical trials (NCT06170593, NCT06186596). The first two arms compared standard provider injections to device-assisted patient-administered injections of 0.1% triamcinolone into inflammatory acne lesions. A third arm was enrolled to compare efficacy of 0.1% vs. 0.2% triamcinolone delivered <i>via</i> self-injections as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-administered injections showed comparable safety and efficacy to provider-administered injections. Patients with more severe lesions reported improved lesion resolution at the higher 0.2% triamcinolone dose. There were no adverse events in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the feasibility of self-administered, provider-prescribed intralesional treatments for inflammatory acne. Home administration could expedite lesion resolution and reduce scarring risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2504656"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intralesional triamcinolone for inflammatory acne: a comparative study of dose efficacy and investigation of a novel injection assistance device to enable self-administration of intralesional therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Lyra B Olson, Callie M Roberts, Sunil S Dhawan, Ann Mazor Reed, Eduardo Weiss, Martin Zaiac, Justin M Ko, Arash Mostaghimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acne is the most common dermatologic condition in the U.S., but few treatments work for individual lesions. One effective spot treatment is an injection of low dose steroid into the inflammatory lesion by a dermatologist or other provider. However, this treatment is not readily available to most patients given limited access to timely in-office injections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>First, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone injection for inflammatory acne delivered by <i>via</i> self-injection with a novel injection assistance device versus standard provider-delivered intralesional injection. Second, to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at 0.1% versus 0.2%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sequentially enrolling, open label arms of study were performed across two clinical trials (NCT06170593, NCT06186596). The first two arms compared standard provider injections to device-assisted patient-administered injections of 0.1% triamcinolone into inflammatory acne lesions. A third arm was enrolled to compare efficacy of 0.1% vs. 0.2% triamcinolone delivered <i>via</i> self-injections as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-administered injections showed comparable safety and efficacy to provider-administered injections. Patients with more severe lesions reported improved lesion resolution at the higher 0.2% triamcinolone dose. There were no adverse events in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the feasibility of self-administered, provider-prescribed intralesional treatments for inflammatory acne. Home administration could expedite lesion resolution and reduce scarring risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2504656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2504656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intralesional triamcinolone for inflammatory acne: a comparative study of dose efficacy and investigation of a novel injection assistance device to enable self-administration of intralesional therapy.
Background: Acne is the most common dermatologic condition in the U.S., but few treatments work for individual lesions. One effective spot treatment is an injection of low dose steroid into the inflammatory lesion by a dermatologist or other provider. However, this treatment is not readily available to most patients given limited access to timely in-office injections.
Objective: First, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone injection for inflammatory acne delivered by via self-injection with a novel injection assistance device versus standard provider-delivered intralesional injection. Second, to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at 0.1% versus 0.2%.
Methods: Three sequentially enrolling, open label arms of study were performed across two clinical trials (NCT06170593, NCT06186596). The first two arms compared standard provider injections to device-assisted patient-administered injections of 0.1% triamcinolone into inflammatory acne lesions. A third arm was enrolled to compare efficacy of 0.1% vs. 0.2% triamcinolone delivered via self-injections as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.
Results: Patient-administered injections showed comparable safety and efficacy to provider-administered injections. Patients with more severe lesions reported improved lesion resolution at the higher 0.2% triamcinolone dose. There were no adverse events in any group.
Conclusion: This study supports the feasibility of self-administered, provider-prescribed intralesional treatments for inflammatory acne. Home administration could expedite lesion resolution and reduce scarring risk.