基于肺力学的呼气末正压滴定可改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者脉压变化的解释。

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001273
Vasiliki Tsolaki, George E Zakynthinos, Nikitas Karavidas, Maria Eirini Papadonta, Ilias Dimeas, Kyriaki Parisi, Theofilos Amanatidis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos
{"title":"基于肺力学的呼气末正压滴定可改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者脉压变化的解释。","authors":"Vasiliki Tsolaki, George E Zakynthinos, Nikitas Karavidas, Maria Eirini Papadonta, Ilias Dimeas, Kyriaki Parisi, Theofilos Amanatidis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on pulse pressure variation (PPV) in patients with moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective interventional self-controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital of Larissa.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>ARDS patients admitted intubated in the ICU (from August 2020 to March 2022).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>PPV and inferior vena cava (IVC) respiratory variability were evaluated at two PEEP levels (first value mainly based on PEEP/Fio2 and second value based on respiratory system compliance). Additionally, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and echocardiographic indices assessing right ventricular (RV) size (RV end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area [RVEDA/LVEDA]), RV systolic function, and RV afterload (pulmonary artery systolic pressure [PASP] and PASP/left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral [PASP/VTILVOT]) were recorded. Ninety-five patients were evaluated. PPV decreased after PEEP reduction (11.7 ± 0.2 to 7.9% ± 0.2%), whereas IVC respiratory variability increased (9.1 ± 0.9 to 14.6% ± 0.1%) and central venous pressure decreased (all p < 0.0001). RV afterload indices decreased (p < 0.0001), simultaneously with RV size (< 0.0001) and systolic function indices' improvements (< 0.05); shock warranted less noradrenaline doses. The change in PPV correlated significantly to respiratory variability in IVC diameter distensibility (p < 0.0001) and moderately to changes in RV size and systolic function (change in RVEDA/change in LVEDA, change in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion); RV afterload (change in PASP [ΔPASP], ΔPASP/VTILVOT); and change in Paco2 (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPV alteration with PEEP decrease, associated with IVC distensibility increases, may indicate the presence of RV dysfunction and increased pulmonary vascular resistances. Whether the patients are in need for fluid loading, fluid responsiveness assessment may be further warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 6","pages":"e1273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration Based on Lung Mechanics May Improve Pulse Pressure Variation Interpretation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Vasiliki Tsolaki, George E Zakynthinos, Nikitas Karavidas, Maria Eirini Papadonta, Ilias Dimeas, Kyriaki Parisi, Theofilos Amanatidis, Epaminondas Zakynthinos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on pulse pressure variation (PPV) in patients with moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective interventional self-controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital of Larissa.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>ARDS patients admitted intubated in the ICU (from August 2020 to March 2022).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>PPV and inferior vena cava (IVC) respiratory variability were evaluated at two PEEP levels (first value mainly based on PEEP/Fio2 and second value based on respiratory system compliance). Additionally, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and echocardiographic indices assessing right ventricular (RV) size (RV end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area [RVEDA/LVEDA]), RV systolic function, and RV afterload (pulmonary artery systolic pressure [PASP] and PASP/left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral [PASP/VTILVOT]) were recorded. Ninety-five patients were evaluated. PPV decreased after PEEP reduction (11.7 ± 0.2 to 7.9% ± 0.2%), whereas IVC respiratory variability increased (9.1 ± 0.9 to 14.6% ± 0.1%) and central venous pressure decreased (all p < 0.0001). RV afterload indices decreased (p < 0.0001), simultaneously with RV size (< 0.0001) and systolic function indices' improvements (< 0.05); shock warranted less noradrenaline doses. The change in PPV correlated significantly to respiratory variability in IVC diameter distensibility (p < 0.0001) and moderately to changes in RV size and systolic function (change in RVEDA/change in LVEDA, change in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion); RV afterload (change in PASP [ΔPASP], ΔPASP/VTILVOT); and change in Paco2 (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPV alteration with PEEP decrease, associated with IVC distensibility increases, may indicate the presence of RV dysfunction and increased pulmonary vascular resistances. Whether the patients are in need for fluid loading, fluid responsiveness assessment may be further warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"e1273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨呼气末正压(PEEP)对中/重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者脉压变化(PPV)的影响。设计:前瞻性干预性自我对照研究。地点:拉里萨大学医院。患者:2020年8月至2022年3月ICU插管收治的ARDS患者。干预措施:没有。测量结果及主要结果:在两个PEEP水平(第一值主要基于PEEP/Fio2,第二值基于呼吸系统顺应性)评估PPV和下腔静脉(IVC)呼吸变异性。此外,记录呼吸力学、血流动力学和超声心动图指标,评估右心室(RV)大小(RV舒张末期面积/左心室舒张末期面积[RVEDA/LVEDA])、右心室收缩功能和右心室后负荷(肺动脉收缩压[PASP]和PASP/左心室流出道速度时间积分[PASP/VTILVOT])。对95名患者进行了评估。PEEP降低后PPV降低(11.7±0.2 ~ 7.9%±0.2%),IVC呼吸变异性升高(9.1±0.9 ~ 14.6%±0.1%),中心静脉压降低(p < 0.0001)。右心室后负荷指数下降(p < 0.0001),与右心室大小(p < 0.0001)和收缩功能指数改善(p < 0.05)同步;休克需要减少去甲肾上腺素的剂量。PPV的变化与下腔静脉直径扩张性的呼吸变异性显著相关(p < 0.0001),与心室大小和收缩功能的变化中度相关(RVEDA/ LVEDA的变化,三尖瓣环平面收缩偏移的变化);RV后负荷(PASP变化[ΔPASP], ΔPASP/VTILVOT);Paco2变化(p < 0.05)。结论:PPV改变伴PEEP降低,伴有下腔静脉扩张性增高,可能提示右心室功能障碍和肺血管阻力增高。患者是否需要液体负荷,可能需要进一步进行液体反应性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration Based on Lung Mechanics May Improve Pulse Pressure Variation Interpretation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on pulse pressure variation (PPV) in patients with moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Design: Prospective interventional self-controlled study.

Setting: University Hospital of Larissa.

Patients: ARDS patients admitted intubated in the ICU (from August 2020 to March 2022).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: PPV and inferior vena cava (IVC) respiratory variability were evaluated at two PEEP levels (first value mainly based on PEEP/Fio2 and second value based on respiratory system compliance). Additionally, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and echocardiographic indices assessing right ventricular (RV) size (RV end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area [RVEDA/LVEDA]), RV systolic function, and RV afterload (pulmonary artery systolic pressure [PASP] and PASP/left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral [PASP/VTILVOT]) were recorded. Ninety-five patients were evaluated. PPV decreased after PEEP reduction (11.7 ± 0.2 to 7.9% ± 0.2%), whereas IVC respiratory variability increased (9.1 ± 0.9 to 14.6% ± 0.1%) and central venous pressure decreased (all p < 0.0001). RV afterload indices decreased (p < 0.0001), simultaneously with RV size (< 0.0001) and systolic function indices' improvements (< 0.05); shock warranted less noradrenaline doses. The change in PPV correlated significantly to respiratory variability in IVC diameter distensibility (p < 0.0001) and moderately to changes in RV size and systolic function (change in RVEDA/change in LVEDA, change in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion); RV afterload (change in PASP [ΔPASP], ΔPASP/VTILVOT); and change in Paco2 (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: PPV alteration with PEEP decrease, associated with IVC distensibility increases, may indicate the presence of RV dysfunction and increased pulmonary vascular resistances. Whether the patients are in need for fluid loading, fluid responsiveness assessment may be further warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信