利用人工智能评估COVID-19关键疾病的遗传易感性:机器学习模型的比较研究

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Advances in laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1515/almed-2025-0073
Salomón Martín Pérez, Flora Sanchez Jimenez, Sandra Fuentes Cantero, Marta Jímenez Barragan, Catalina Sanchez Mora, Juan M Borreguero Leon, Arrobas Velilla Teresa, Agustín Valido Morales, Juan A Delgado Torralbo, Antonio León Justel
{"title":"利用人工智能评估COVID-19关键疾病的遗传易感性:机器学习模型的比较研究","authors":"Salomón Martín Pérez, Flora Sanchez Jimenez, Sandra Fuentes Cantero, Marta Jímenez Barragan, Catalina Sanchez Mora, Juan M Borreguero Leon, Arrobas Velilla Teresa, Agustín Valido Morales, Juan A Delgado Torralbo, Antonio León Justel","doi":"10.1515/almed-2025-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early prediction of critical COVID-19 disease is crucial for an optimal clinical management. The objective of this study was to optimize predictive models for critical COVID-19 disease. Clinical data, laboratory data and genetic polymorphisms were integrated into AI models to compare the performance of different machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 155 inpatients were analyzed, 23 of whom developed critical disease. A univariate analysis was performed to assess potential correlations between seven SNPs, nine clinical variables and 10 laboratory parameters at admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7 SNPs, only three SNPs demonstrated a significant association with critical disase, namely: rs77534576, rs10774671 and rs10490770. The ensemble models exhibited the best performance: Random Forest (AUC=0.989), XGBoost (AUC=0.954) and AdaBoost (AUC=0.927). Variable importance varied across models, with age, C-reactive protein, heart diseases and the three SNPs being the most influential features. The predictive power of models improved with the integration of the three SNPs, as compared to previous studies where genetic data were not included. Internal validation confirmed the superiority and stability of the ensemble models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models may help predict progression into critical COVID-19-disease. The predictive power of models improves when SNPs associated with COVID-19 severity are integrated with laboratory and clinical data. Prior to implementation in clinical practice, larger studies in different populations are needed to validate and support the generalization of these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":72097,"journal":{"name":"Advances in laboratory medicine","volume":"6 2","pages":"181-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of artificial intelligence to assess genetic predisposition to develop critical COVID-19 disease: a comparative study of machine learning models.\",\"authors\":\"Salomón Martín Pérez, Flora Sanchez Jimenez, Sandra Fuentes Cantero, Marta Jímenez Barragan, Catalina Sanchez Mora, Juan M Borreguero Leon, Arrobas Velilla Teresa, Agustín Valido Morales, Juan A Delgado Torralbo, Antonio León Justel\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/almed-2025-0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early prediction of critical COVID-19 disease is crucial for an optimal clinical management. The objective of this study was to optimize predictive models for critical COVID-19 disease. Clinical data, laboratory data and genetic polymorphisms were integrated into AI models to compare the performance of different machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 155 inpatients were analyzed, 23 of whom developed critical disease. A univariate analysis was performed to assess potential correlations between seven SNPs, nine clinical variables and 10 laboratory parameters at admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7 SNPs, only three SNPs demonstrated a significant association with critical disase, namely: rs77534576, rs10774671 and rs10490770. The ensemble models exhibited the best performance: Random Forest (AUC=0.989), XGBoost (AUC=0.954) and AdaBoost (AUC=0.927). Variable importance varied across models, with age, C-reactive protein, heart diseases and the three SNPs being the most influential features. The predictive power of models improved with the integration of the three SNPs, as compared to previous studies where genetic data were not included. Internal validation confirmed the superiority and stability of the ensemble models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models may help predict progression into critical COVID-19-disease. The predictive power of models improves when SNPs associated with COVID-19 severity are integrated with laboratory and clinical data. Prior to implementation in clinical practice, larger studies in different populations are needed to validate and support the generalization of these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"181-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/almed-2025-0073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/almed-2025-0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:早期预测COVID-19危重症是优化临床管理的关键。本研究的目的是优化COVID-19关键疾病的预测模型。临床数据、实验室数据和遗传多态性被整合到人工智能模型中,以比较不同机器学习算法的性能。方法:对155例住院患者资料进行分析,其中23例发展为危重症。进行单因素分析,评估入院时7个snp、9个临床变量和10个实验室参数之间的潜在相关性。结果:在7个snp中,只有3个snp与危重症有显著相关性,分别是rs777534576、rs10774671和rs10490770。其中,随机森林模型(AUC=0.989)、XGBoost模型(AUC=0.954)和AdaBoost模型(AUC=0.927)表现最好。不同模型的变量重要性各不相同,年龄、c反应蛋白、心脏病和三个snp是最具影响力的特征。与之前不包括遗传数据的研究相比,模型的预测能力随着三个snp的整合而提高。内部验证证实了集成模型的优越性和稳定性。结论:机器学习模型可能有助于预测covid -19重症的进展。当与COVID-19严重程度相关的snp与实验室和临床数据相结合时,模型的预测能力得到提高。在临床实践中实施之前,需要在不同人群中进行更大规模的研究来验证和支持这些结果的推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of artificial intelligence to assess genetic predisposition to develop critical COVID-19 disease: a comparative study of machine learning models.

Use of artificial intelligence to assess genetic predisposition to develop critical COVID-19 disease: a comparative study of machine learning models.

Objectives: Early prediction of critical COVID-19 disease is crucial for an optimal clinical management. The objective of this study was to optimize predictive models for critical COVID-19 disease. Clinical data, laboratory data and genetic polymorphisms were integrated into AI models to compare the performance of different machine learning algorithms.

Methods: Data from 155 inpatients were analyzed, 23 of whom developed critical disease. A univariate analysis was performed to assess potential correlations between seven SNPs, nine clinical variables and 10 laboratory parameters at admission.

Results: Of the 7 SNPs, only three SNPs demonstrated a significant association with critical disase, namely: rs77534576, rs10774671 and rs10490770. The ensemble models exhibited the best performance: Random Forest (AUC=0.989), XGBoost (AUC=0.954) and AdaBoost (AUC=0.927). Variable importance varied across models, with age, C-reactive protein, heart diseases and the three SNPs being the most influential features. The predictive power of models improved with the integration of the three SNPs, as compared to previous studies where genetic data were not included. Internal validation confirmed the superiority and stability of the ensemble models.

Conclusions: Machine learning models may help predict progression into critical COVID-19-disease. The predictive power of models improves when SNPs associated with COVID-19 severity are integrated with laboratory and clinical data. Prior to implementation in clinical practice, larger studies in different populations are needed to validate and support the generalization of these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信