膝关节置换术患者高危孤立远端深静脉血栓形成的全麻联合周围神经阻滞与不加神经阻滞的轴向麻醉的相关性:一项历史队列研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nanbo Luo, Li Luo, Lei Yang, Zhi Li, Qingmin Yu, Wenling Jian, Wei Sun, Pac-Soo Chen, Qian Chen, Daqing Ma, Qingsheng Xue, Yan Luo, Buwei Yu, Hao Wang, Zhiheng Liu
{"title":"膝关节置换术患者高危孤立远端深静脉血栓形成的全麻联合周围神经阻滞与不加神经阻滞的轴向麻醉的相关性:一项历史队列研究","authors":"Nanbo Luo, Li Luo, Lei Yang, Zhi Li, Qingmin Yu, Wenling Jian, Wei Sun, Pac-Soo Chen, Qian Chen, Daqing Ma, Qingsheng Xue, Yan Luo, Buwei Yu, Hao Wang, Zhiheng Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02957-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks has become a common anesthesia regimen for knee replacement surgery. Its association with high-risk isolated distal deep venous thrombosis (IDDVT) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study, we obtained consecutive data from the electronic inpatient records of Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, including adults who underwent knee arthroplasty from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of high-risk IDDVT. We compared the outcomes in patients who received general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks with those in patients who received neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks, using a multivariable regression model with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 848 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty, 330 were excluded because they lacked thrombus testing or had received other types of anesthesia. Of the remaining 518 patients, 267/518 (52%) received general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks and 251/518 (48%) received neuraxial anesthesia with no nerve blocks. A total of 99 patients developed high-risk IDDVT. In the primary multivariable analysis with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score, general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks was associated with a significantly reduced high-risk IDDVT compared with neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.81; P = 0.005). The results of multiple sensitivity analyses were similar between the two cohorts. E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with neuraxial anesthesia without peripheral nerve blocks, general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty was associated with a reduced incidence of high-risk IDDVT in our retrospective study. A large multicentre prospective clinical trial is needed to validate our findings.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2200057006 ), first submitted 25 February 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks versus neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks for high-risk isolated distal deep venous thrombosis in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a historical cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Nanbo Luo, Li Luo, Lei Yang, Zhi Li, Qingmin Yu, Wenling Jian, Wei Sun, Pac-Soo Chen, Qian Chen, Daqing Ma, Qingsheng Xue, Yan Luo, Buwei Yu, Hao Wang, Zhiheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-025-02957-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks has become a common anesthesia regimen for knee replacement surgery. Its association with high-risk isolated distal deep venous thrombosis (IDDVT) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study, we obtained consecutive data from the electronic inpatient records of Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, including adults who underwent knee arthroplasty from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of high-risk IDDVT. We compared the outcomes in patients who received general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks with those in patients who received neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks, using a multivariable regression model with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 848 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty, 330 were excluded because they lacked thrombus testing or had received other types of anesthesia. Of the remaining 518 patients, 267/518 (52%) received general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks and 251/518 (48%) received neuraxial anesthesia with no nerve blocks. A total of 99 patients developed high-risk IDDVT. In the primary multivariable analysis with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score, general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks was associated with a significantly reduced high-risk IDDVT compared with neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.81; P = 0.005). The results of multiple sensitivity analyses were similar between the two cohorts. E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with neuraxial anesthesia without peripheral nerve blocks, general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty was associated with a reduced incidence of high-risk IDDVT in our retrospective study. A large multicentre prospective clinical trial is needed to validate our findings.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2200057006 ), first submitted 25 February 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02957-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02957-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全身麻醉联合周围神经阻滞已成为膝关节置换术常用的麻醉方案。其与高危孤立性远端深静脉血栓(IDDVT)的关系尚不确定。方法:在本队列研究中,我们从深圳市第二人民医院的电子住院病历中获得连续数据,包括2019年9月1日至2021年8月31日接受膝关节置换术的成年人。主要结局是高危IDDVT的发生率。我们采用多变量回归模型,根据倾向评分采用逆概率加权,比较了全麻联合神经阻滞与不进行神经阻滞的轴向麻醉患者的预后。结果:在848例接受膝关节置换术的患者中,330例因缺乏血栓检测或接受了其他类型的麻醉而被排除。其余518例患者中,267/518例(52%)接受全麻联合神经阻滞,251/518例(48%)接受无神经阻滞的轴向麻醉。共有99例患者发生高风险IDDVT。在根据倾向评分进行逆概率加权的初级多变量分析中,与不使用神经阻滞的神经轴向麻醉相比,全麻联合神经阻滞与高危IDDVT的显著降低相关(优势比,0.50;95%置信区间为0.31 ~ 0.81;p = 0.005)。多重敏感性分析的结果在两个队列之间相似。e值分析显示对未测量的混杂具有稳健性。结论:在我们的回顾性研究中,与不进行周围神经阻滞的神经轴向麻醉相比,全麻联合周围神经阻滞的膝关节置换术患者高危IDDVT的发生率降低。需要一个大型的多中心前瞻性临床试验来验证我们的发现。研究注册:ChiCTR.org.cn (ChiCTR2200057006),首次提交日期为2022年2月25日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks versus neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks for high-risk isolated distal deep venous thrombosis in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a historical cohort study.

Purpose: General anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks has become a common anesthesia regimen for knee replacement surgery. Its association with high-risk isolated distal deep venous thrombosis (IDDVT) remains uncertain.

Methods: In this cohort study, we obtained consecutive data from the electronic inpatient records of Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, including adults who underwent knee arthroplasty from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of high-risk IDDVT. We compared the outcomes in patients who received general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks with those in patients who received neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks, using a multivariable regression model with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score.

Results: Of the 848 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty, 330 were excluded because they lacked thrombus testing or had received other types of anesthesia. Of the remaining 518 patients, 267/518 (52%) received general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks and 251/518 (48%) received neuraxial anesthesia with no nerve blocks. A total of 99 patients developed high-risk IDDVT. In the primary multivariable analysis with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score, general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks was associated with a significantly reduced high-risk IDDVT compared with neuraxial anesthesia without nerve blocks (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.81; P = 0.005). The results of multiple sensitivity analyses were similar between the two cohorts. E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.

Conclusions: Compared with neuraxial anesthesia without peripheral nerve blocks, general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty was associated with a reduced incidence of high-risk IDDVT in our retrospective study. A large multicentre prospective clinical trial is needed to validate our findings.

Study registration: ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2200057006 ), first submitted 25 February 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信