妊娠32周前重复给药后20年的结果:一项随机临床试验的随访

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004618
Robyn W May, Anthony G B Walters, Greg D Gamble, Caroline A Crowther, Stuart R Dalziel, Carl L Eagleton, Christopher J D McKinlay, Barry J Milne, Jane E Harding
{"title":"妊娠32周前重复给药后20年的结果:一项随机临床试验的随访","authors":"Robyn W May, Anthony G B Walters, Greg D Gamble, Caroline A Crowther, Stuart R Dalziel, Carl L Eagleton, Christopher J D McKinlay, Barry J Milne, Jane E Harding","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For women who have received a course of antenatal corticosteroids ≥7 days prior and have ongoing risk of preterm birth within the next 7 days, repeat dose(s) of corticosteroids up to 32 weeks' gestation have been shown to reduce neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and serious health problems in the neonatal period but not other neonatal morbidities such as chronic lung disease, death, severe intraventricular haemorrhage or necrotising enterocolitis. Repeat antenatal corticosteroids were not associated with either benefit or harms in mid-childhood. However, this may have been too early to evaluate potential adverse effects on respiratory and other long-term outcomes. We aimed to assess if exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids administered to pregnant women up to 32 weeks' gestation has beneficial or harmful effects on respiratory and general health of the offspring in adulthood.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We assessed the adult offspring of New Zealand participants in the Australasian Collaborative Trial of Repeat Doses of Corticosteroids for the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Disease (ACTORDS), a multicentre, placebo-controlled trial where women at risk of preterm birth within the next week, 7 or more days after having received a single course of corticosteroids were randomised to a repeat dose of intramuscular betamethasone or placebo, that could be repeated weekly if at ongoing preterm birth risk. Follow-up at 20 years included a health questionnaire and consent to access administrative data sources. The primary outcome was any asthma diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, mental and general health, functional difficulties and social outcomes. Of 352 infants born to 290 maternal trial participants, we assessed 214 (61%; 96 (45%) female) at mean (standard deviation) age 20.5 (1.5) years. The rate of any asthma diagnosis was similar in both groups (58/107 (54%) repeat bethamethasone versus 50/107 (47%) placebo; risk ratio adjusted for gestational age at trial entry, multiplicity and birth centre 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.87, 1.46). Differences between the groups for the secondary outcomes were generally small and confidence intervals included the possibility of no difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this follow-up of a randomised clinical trial, our data suggest neither major harm nor benefit for the offspring in early adulthood following exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids compared with a single course prior to 32 weeks' gestation. Smaller effects cannot be excluded and follow-up of adult offspring from other trials of repeat antenatal corticosteroids is recommended.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN48656428.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 5","pages":"e1004618"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twenty-year outcomes after repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids prior to 32 weeks' gestation: Follow-up of a randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Robyn W May, Anthony G B Walters, Greg D Gamble, Caroline A Crowther, Stuart R Dalziel, Carl L Eagleton, Christopher J D McKinlay, Barry J Milne, Jane E Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For women who have received a course of antenatal corticosteroids ≥7 days prior and have ongoing risk of preterm birth within the next 7 days, repeat dose(s) of corticosteroids up to 32 weeks' gestation have been shown to reduce neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and serious health problems in the neonatal period but not other neonatal morbidities such as chronic lung disease, death, severe intraventricular haemorrhage or necrotising enterocolitis. Repeat antenatal corticosteroids were not associated with either benefit or harms in mid-childhood. However, this may have been too early to evaluate potential adverse effects on respiratory and other long-term outcomes. We aimed to assess if exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids administered to pregnant women up to 32 weeks' gestation has beneficial or harmful effects on respiratory and general health of the offspring in adulthood.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We assessed the adult offspring of New Zealand participants in the Australasian Collaborative Trial of Repeat Doses of Corticosteroids for the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Disease (ACTORDS), a multicentre, placebo-controlled trial where women at risk of preterm birth within the next week, 7 or more days after having received a single course of corticosteroids were randomised to a repeat dose of intramuscular betamethasone or placebo, that could be repeated weekly if at ongoing preterm birth risk. Follow-up at 20 years included a health questionnaire and consent to access administrative data sources. The primary outcome was any asthma diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, mental and general health, functional difficulties and social outcomes. Of 352 infants born to 290 maternal trial participants, we assessed 214 (61%; 96 (45%) female) at mean (standard deviation) age 20.5 (1.5) years. The rate of any asthma diagnosis was similar in both groups (58/107 (54%) repeat bethamethasone versus 50/107 (47%) placebo; risk ratio adjusted for gestational age at trial entry, multiplicity and birth centre 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.87, 1.46). Differences between the groups for the secondary outcomes were generally small and confidence intervals included the possibility of no difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this follow-up of a randomised clinical trial, our data suggest neither major harm nor benefit for the offspring in early adulthood following exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids compared with a single course prior to 32 weeks' gestation. Smaller effects cannot be excluded and follow-up of adult offspring from other trials of repeat antenatal corticosteroids is recommended.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN48656428.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"e1004618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004618\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004618","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于产前接受糖皮质激素治疗≥7天且在未来7天内存在早产风险的妇女,在妊娠32周内重复使用糖皮质激素可减少新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征和新生儿期的严重健康问题,但不能减少其他新生儿发病率,如慢性肺病、死亡、严重脑室内出血或坏死性小肠结肠炎。重复产前皮质类固醇在儿童中期既没有益处也没有危害。然而,现在评估对呼吸系统和其他长期结果的潜在不利影响可能还为时过早。我们的目的是评估妊娠32周的孕妇在产前接受重复剂量的皮质类固醇对成年后后代的呼吸系统和一般健康是否有有益或有害的影响。方法与发现:我们评估了澳大拉西亚重复剂量皮质类固醇预防新生儿呼吸系统疾病合作试验(ACTORDS)中新西兰参与者的成年后代,这是一项多中心安慰剂对照试验,在接受单疗程皮质类固醇后的一周内,7天或更长时间内有早产风险的妇女被随机分配到重复剂量的肌内倍他米松或安慰剂。如果有早产风险,可以每周重复一次。20年的随访包括一份健康问卷和同意访问行政数据源。主要结局是任何哮喘诊断。次要结局包括神经发育、心血管、心理和一般健康、功能障碍和社会结局。在290名母亲试验参与者所生的352名婴儿中,我们评估了214名(61%;96例(45%)女性),平均(标准差)年龄20.5(1.5)岁。两组哮喘诊断率相似(58/107(54%)重复使用贝他米松与50/107(47%)安慰剂;经试验起始胎龄、多胎性和生育中心调整后的风险比为1.13,95%可信区间为0.87,1.46)。次要结果组间差异一般较小,置信区间包括组间无差异的可能性。结论:在这项随机临床试验的随访中,我们的数据显示,与妊娠32周之前的单疗程相比,重复剂量的产前皮质类固醇暴露对成年早期的后代既没有重大危害,也没有重大益处。不能排除较小的影响,建议对其他重复产前皮质类固醇试验的成年后代进行随访。试验注册:国际标准随机对照试验,编号ISRCTN48656428。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Twenty-year outcomes after repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids prior to 32 weeks' gestation: Follow-up of a randomised clinical trial.

Background: For women who have received a course of antenatal corticosteroids ≥7 days prior and have ongoing risk of preterm birth within the next 7 days, repeat dose(s) of corticosteroids up to 32 weeks' gestation have been shown to reduce neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and serious health problems in the neonatal period but not other neonatal morbidities such as chronic lung disease, death, severe intraventricular haemorrhage or necrotising enterocolitis. Repeat antenatal corticosteroids were not associated with either benefit or harms in mid-childhood. However, this may have been too early to evaluate potential adverse effects on respiratory and other long-term outcomes. We aimed to assess if exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids administered to pregnant women up to 32 weeks' gestation has beneficial or harmful effects on respiratory and general health of the offspring in adulthood.

Methods and findings: We assessed the adult offspring of New Zealand participants in the Australasian Collaborative Trial of Repeat Doses of Corticosteroids for the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Disease (ACTORDS), a multicentre, placebo-controlled trial where women at risk of preterm birth within the next week, 7 or more days after having received a single course of corticosteroids were randomised to a repeat dose of intramuscular betamethasone or placebo, that could be repeated weekly if at ongoing preterm birth risk. Follow-up at 20 years included a health questionnaire and consent to access administrative data sources. The primary outcome was any asthma diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, mental and general health, functional difficulties and social outcomes. Of 352 infants born to 290 maternal trial participants, we assessed 214 (61%; 96 (45%) female) at mean (standard deviation) age 20.5 (1.5) years. The rate of any asthma diagnosis was similar in both groups (58/107 (54%) repeat bethamethasone versus 50/107 (47%) placebo; risk ratio adjusted for gestational age at trial entry, multiplicity and birth centre 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.87, 1.46). Differences between the groups for the secondary outcomes were generally small and confidence intervals included the possibility of no difference between groups.

Conclusions: In this follow-up of a randomised clinical trial, our data suggest neither major harm nor benefit for the offspring in early adulthood following exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids compared with a single course prior to 32 weeks' gestation. Smaller effects cannot be excluded and follow-up of adult offspring from other trials of repeat antenatal corticosteroids is recommended.

Trial registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN48656428.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信