养老院护理员对残疾居民的尊严观。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Yiqian Tang, Chenxi Zhu, Lilu Wang, Lianlian Zhu, Yechun Gu, Hongbo Xu
{"title":"养老院护理员对残疾居民的尊严观。","authors":"Yiqian Tang, Chenxi Zhu, Lilu Wang, Lianlian Zhu, Yechun Gu, Hongbo Xu","doi":"10.1177/09697330251346428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCaregivers in nursing homes are crucial in looking after disabled older adults. They often resort to physical restraints for various reasons, including safety concerns and resource limitations. However, this practice can impact the dignity of these individuals. In China, current research has rarely explored this issue at the caregiver level, leaving a critical gap in our understanding of this complex situation.Research objectivesThe purpose was to understand Chinese nursing home caregivers' perceptions and practices of dignity maintenance for physically restrained disabled older adults, as well as to provide a reference point for dignity maintenance.Research designThis is a qualitative descriptive study in which data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using Colaizzi's 7-step method.Participants and research contextBetween October and December 2024, 13 caregivers from three nursing homes in Wenzhou City, China, were selected for the study using purposive sampling.Ethical considerationsThe ethics committee approved the study design on December 4, 2020 (approval number 2020-126).ResultsA total of three main themes and 11 sub-themes were distilled. The main themes included \"Diverse perspectives on dignity maintenance in physical restraint,\" \"The realistic dilemma of dignity maintenance practices in physical restraint,\" and \"The practice of physical restraint based on the principle of whole-person care.\"ConclusionsNursing home caregivers have multiple views of dignity maintenance for physically restrained disabled older adults, and there are numerous barriers to maintaining dignity. Measures should be taken to optimize dignity maintenance practices, improve the quality of older adult care services, maintain the dignity and rights of disabled older persons, reduce the pressure on caregivers, and enhance occupational satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251346428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing home caregivers' views on dignity in restraining disabled residents.\",\"authors\":\"Yiqian Tang, Chenxi Zhu, Lilu Wang, Lianlian Zhu, Yechun Gu, Hongbo Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330251346428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundCaregivers in nursing homes are crucial in looking after disabled older adults. They often resort to physical restraints for various reasons, including safety concerns and resource limitations. However, this practice can impact the dignity of these individuals. In China, current research has rarely explored this issue at the caregiver level, leaving a critical gap in our understanding of this complex situation.Research objectivesThe purpose was to understand Chinese nursing home caregivers' perceptions and practices of dignity maintenance for physically restrained disabled older adults, as well as to provide a reference point for dignity maintenance.Research designThis is a qualitative descriptive study in which data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using Colaizzi's 7-step method.Participants and research contextBetween October and December 2024, 13 caregivers from three nursing homes in Wenzhou City, China, were selected for the study using purposive sampling.Ethical considerationsThe ethics committee approved the study design on December 4, 2020 (approval number 2020-126).ResultsA total of three main themes and 11 sub-themes were distilled. The main themes included \\\"Diverse perspectives on dignity maintenance in physical restraint,\\\" \\\"The realistic dilemma of dignity maintenance practices in physical restraint,\\\" and \\\"The practice of physical restraint based on the principle of whole-person care.\\\"ConclusionsNursing home caregivers have multiple views of dignity maintenance for physically restrained disabled older adults, and there are numerous barriers to maintaining dignity. Measures should be taken to optimize dignity maintenance practices, improve the quality of older adult care services, maintain the dignity and rights of disabled older persons, reduce the pressure on caregivers, and enhance occupational satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9697330251346428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251346428\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251346428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疗养院的护理人员在照顾残疾老年人方面起着至关重要的作用。他们经常出于各种原因,包括安全考虑和资源限制,采取身体限制。然而,这种做法可能会影响这些人的尊严。在中国,目前的研究很少在护理者层面探讨这一问题,这给我们对这一复杂情况的理解留下了一个严重的空白。研究目的了解中国养老院照顾者对肢体受限残疾老年人尊严维护的认知和实践,为尊严维护提供参考依据。研究设计这是一项定性描述性研究,通过半结构化访谈收集数据。采用Colaizzi的7步法对收集到的数据进行分析。研究对象和研究背景2024年10月至12月,采用有目的抽样的方法,从中国温州市三家养老院选取13名护理人员进行研究。伦理委员会于2020年12月4日批准了本研究设计(批准号2020-126)。结果共提取出3个主旋律和11个副旋律。主题包括“对人身约束中尊严维护的不同看法”、“人身约束中尊严维护实践的现实困境”和“基于全人护理原则的人身约束实践”。结论居家护理人员对肢体受限残疾老年人的尊严维护存在多种观点,尊严维护存在诸多障碍。应采取措施优化尊严维护实践,提高老年人护理服务质量,维护残疾老年人的尊严和权利,减轻照顾者的压力,提高职业满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing home caregivers' views on dignity in restraining disabled residents.

BackgroundCaregivers in nursing homes are crucial in looking after disabled older adults. They often resort to physical restraints for various reasons, including safety concerns and resource limitations. However, this practice can impact the dignity of these individuals. In China, current research has rarely explored this issue at the caregiver level, leaving a critical gap in our understanding of this complex situation.Research objectivesThe purpose was to understand Chinese nursing home caregivers' perceptions and practices of dignity maintenance for physically restrained disabled older adults, as well as to provide a reference point for dignity maintenance.Research designThis is a qualitative descriptive study in which data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using Colaizzi's 7-step method.Participants and research contextBetween October and December 2024, 13 caregivers from three nursing homes in Wenzhou City, China, were selected for the study using purposive sampling.Ethical considerationsThe ethics committee approved the study design on December 4, 2020 (approval number 2020-126).ResultsA total of three main themes and 11 sub-themes were distilled. The main themes included "Diverse perspectives on dignity maintenance in physical restraint," "The realistic dilemma of dignity maintenance practices in physical restraint," and "The practice of physical restraint based on the principle of whole-person care."ConclusionsNursing home caregivers have multiple views of dignity maintenance for physically restrained disabled older adults, and there are numerous barriers to maintaining dignity. Measures should be taken to optimize dignity maintenance practices, improve the quality of older adult care services, maintain the dignity and rights of disabled older persons, reduce the pressure on caregivers, and enhance occupational satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信