人工智能和机器学习在临床开发中的采用和使用。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Mary Jo Lamberti, Maria I Florez, Hana Do, Stephanie Rosner, Timothe Menard, Carrie Nielson, Amanda Donovan, Jingjing Ye, Sathish Kaveripakam, Birgit Schoeberl, Alette R Hunt, Helen Yeardley
{"title":"人工智能和机器学习在临床开发中的采用和使用。","authors":"Mary Jo Lamberti, Maria I Florez, Hana Do, Stephanie Rosner, Timothe Menard, Carrie Nielson, Amanda Donovan, Jingjing Ye, Sathish Kaveripakam, Birgit Schoeberl, Alette R Hunt, Helen Yeardley","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00803-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in drug discovery has been well documented, but measures of levels of adoption, investments, and efficiencies gained from its use in clinical development have not yet been developed, captured or published. AI/ML use in clinical development is expected to increase, but its impact has not yet been systematically measured until now.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted a global online survey among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and data and technology vendors servicing drug developers. The survey gathered 302 responses assessing levels of AI/ML implementation across 36 distinct clinical trial planning and design, trial execution, and regulatory submission activities. The survey collected data on US dollar investment, time savings, and challenges and opportunities of AI/ML use in clinical development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately one-third of the sample (36.9%) was not yet using or implementing AI/ML across 36 design and planning, execution, and regulatory submission activities; another 30.3% was beginning their AI/ML implementation (or piloting), 22.1% was partially implementing (or moving beyond pilots), and on average only 10.7% had fully implemented AI/ML (i.e., uses AI in most trials employing a repeatable process).</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adoption and Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Development.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Jo Lamberti, Maria I Florez, Hana Do, Stephanie Rosner, Timothe Menard, Carrie Nielson, Amanda Donovan, Jingjing Ye, Sathish Kaveripakam, Birgit Schoeberl, Alette R Hunt, Helen Yeardley\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-025-00803-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in drug discovery has been well documented, but measures of levels of adoption, investments, and efficiencies gained from its use in clinical development have not yet been developed, captured or published. AI/ML use in clinical development is expected to increase, but its impact has not yet been systematically measured until now.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted a global online survey among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and data and technology vendors servicing drug developers. The survey gathered 302 responses assessing levels of AI/ML implementation across 36 distinct clinical trial planning and design, trial execution, and regulatory submission activities. The survey collected data on US dollar investment, time savings, and challenges and opportunities of AI/ML use in clinical development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately one-third of the sample (36.9%) was not yet using or implementing AI/ML across 36 design and planning, execution, and regulatory submission activities; another 30.3% was beginning their AI/ML implementation (or piloting), 22.1% was partially implementing (or moving beyond pilots), and on average only 10.7% had fully implemented AI/ML (i.e., uses AI in most trials employing a repeatable process).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00803-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00803-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)在药物发现中的使用已经有了很好的记录,但是在临床开发中使用人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)所获得的采用水平、投资和效率的衡量标准尚未被开发、捕获或发表。人工智能/机器学习在临床开发中的应用预计会增加,但到目前为止,其影响尚未得到系统的衡量。方法:塔夫茨药物开发研究中心对制药和生物技术公司、合同研究组织(cro)以及为药物开发人员提供服务的数据和技术供应商进行了一项全球在线调查。该调查收集了302份回复,评估了36个不同临床试验计划和设计、试验执行和监管提交活动中人工智能/机器学习实施的水平。该调查收集了在临床开发中使用AI/ML的美元投资、时间节省以及挑战和机遇等数据。结果:大约三分之一的样本(36.9%)尚未在36个设计和规划、执行和监管提交活动中使用或实施AI/ML;另有30.3%的人开始实施AI/ML(或试点),22.1%的人部分实施(或超越试点),平均只有10.7%的人完全实施了AI/ML(即在大多数采用可重复过程的试验中使用AI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Adoption and Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Development.

Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in drug discovery has been well documented, but measures of levels of adoption, investments, and efficiencies gained from its use in clinical development have not yet been developed, captured or published. AI/ML use in clinical development is expected to increase, but its impact has not yet been systematically measured until now.

Methods: The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted a global online survey among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and data and technology vendors servicing drug developers. The survey gathered 302 responses assessing levels of AI/ML implementation across 36 distinct clinical trial planning and design, trial execution, and regulatory submission activities. The survey collected data on US dollar investment, time savings, and challenges and opportunities of AI/ML use in clinical development.

Results: Approximately one-third of the sample (36.9%) was not yet using or implementing AI/ML across 36 design and planning, execution, and regulatory submission activities; another 30.3% was beginning their AI/ML implementation (or piloting), 22.1% was partially implementing (or moving beyond pilots), and on average only 10.7% had fully implemented AI/ML (i.e., uses AI in most trials employing a repeatable process).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信