Dalil Ali, Claudius Juergens, Markus Unnewehr, Maximilian Schmeding
{"title":"普通手术后常规血液样本分析的价值和相关性——1198例患者的单中心分析。","authors":"Dalil Ali, Claudius Juergens, Markus Unnewehr, Maximilian Schmeding","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03726-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine blood sample analysis is performed in most surgical institutions after general surgery on the first postoperative day. Substantial economical impact is thereby generated in addition to patient distress caused by venous puncture.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The presented study was designed to analyse the relevance of postoperative routine blood sampling with special focus on patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1198 patients undergoing minor general surgical procedures (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, groin hernia repair) at our institution were retrospectively analysed. Data was gathered and forwarded to statistical evaluation with respect to patient safety and economical impact / cost-saving potential.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 5,3% of our patients there was clinical impact of postoperative blood sampling. Relevant medical treatment consequences were derived for complicated appendectomy cases only.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our data suggests that routine postoperative blood sample analysis after minor general surgery has very little impact on the further clinical course. Patient safety is not at risk. Regarding the economical and distressing impacts of routine blood-drawing post-operatively it should be evaluated if routine sampling may be limited to special interest cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value and relevance of routine postoperative blood sample analysis after general surgery-a single centre analysis of 1198 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Dalil Ali, Claudius Juergens, Markus Unnewehr, Maximilian Schmeding\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03726-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine blood sample analysis is performed in most surgical institutions after general surgery on the first postoperative day. Substantial economical impact is thereby generated in addition to patient distress caused by venous puncture.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The presented study was designed to analyse the relevance of postoperative routine blood sampling with special focus on patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1198 patients undergoing minor general surgical procedures (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, groin hernia repair) at our institution were retrospectively analysed. Data was gathered and forwarded to statistical evaluation with respect to patient safety and economical impact / cost-saving potential.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 5,3% of our patients there was clinical impact of postoperative blood sampling. Relevant medical treatment consequences were derived for complicated appendectomy cases only.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our data suggests that routine postoperative blood sample analysis after minor general surgery has very little impact on the further clinical course. Patient safety is not at risk. Regarding the economical and distressing impacts of routine blood-drawing post-operatively it should be evaluated if routine sampling may be limited to special interest cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03726-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03726-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Value and relevance of routine postoperative blood sample analysis after general surgery-a single centre analysis of 1198 patients.
Background: Routine blood sample analysis is performed in most surgical institutions after general surgery on the first postoperative day. Substantial economical impact is thereby generated in addition to patient distress caused by venous puncture.
Aim: The presented study was designed to analyse the relevance of postoperative routine blood sampling with special focus on patient safety.
Methods: 1198 patients undergoing minor general surgical procedures (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, groin hernia repair) at our institution were retrospectively analysed. Data was gathered and forwarded to statistical evaluation with respect to patient safety and economical impact / cost-saving potential.
Results: In 5,3% of our patients there was clinical impact of postoperative blood sampling. Relevant medical treatment consequences were derived for complicated appendectomy cases only.
Discussion: Our data suggests that routine postoperative blood sample analysis after minor general surgery has very little impact on the further clinical course. Patient safety is not at risk. Regarding the economical and distressing impacts of routine blood-drawing post-operatively it should be evaluated if routine sampling may be limited to special interest cases.
期刊介绍：
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
