揭示更多关于低水平激光治疗对肌腱病变疼痛的短期效果:一项荟萃分析的系统综述。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Benjamin Wei Da Yap, Edwin Choon Wyn Lim
{"title":"揭示更多关于低水平激光治疗对肌腱病变疼痛的短期效果:一项荟萃分析的系统综述。","authors":"Benjamin Wei Da Yap, Edwin Choon Wyn Lim","doi":"10.1177/10538127251339104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn recent years, the effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on pain in tendinopathy has been increasingly evaluated in clinical trials. However, conflicting evidence regarding its use persists.ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to evaluate the effect of LLLT on pain in the management of tendinopathy, and investigate the influence of LLLT parameters on the effect size of pain score.MethodsSearches of eight databases were conducted from inception to Jan 2025. Meta-analyses were conducted where possible, using either a fixed- or random-effects model, standardized mean differences (SMDs), and tests of heterogeneity. Multivariable meta-regression was performed to identify significant predictors of the effect size in pain score.ResultsThirty-five clinical controlled trials were identified and included in the meta-analyses. Compared to minimal intervention, LLLT provided superior pain relief in chronic tendinopathy, with pooled SMD -0.57(95% confidence interval [CI] -0.93 to -0.20, <i>P</i> = 0.002) after sensitivity analysis (15 RCTs, 299 participants in the experimental group and 282 participants in the control group). Additionally, the total number of sessions was a significant predictor of the effect size of pain relief (<i>P</i> < 0.05), after adjusting for age.ConclusionsLLLT is more effective than minimal intervention for pain relief in chronic tendinopathy. Greater total number of treatment sessions may be associated with a greater extent of pain relief.OtherNo funding was received for this review. PROSPERO registration number (CRD42021256567).</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251339104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shedding more light on the short-term effect of low-level laser therapy on pain in tendinopathy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Wei Da Yap, Edwin Choon Wyn Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251339104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIn recent years, the effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on pain in tendinopathy has been increasingly evaluated in clinical trials. However, conflicting evidence regarding its use persists.ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to evaluate the effect of LLLT on pain in the management of tendinopathy, and investigate the influence of LLLT parameters on the effect size of pain score.MethodsSearches of eight databases were conducted from inception to Jan 2025. Meta-analyses were conducted where possible, using either a fixed- or random-effects model, standardized mean differences (SMDs), and tests of heterogeneity. Multivariable meta-regression was performed to identify significant predictors of the effect size in pain score.ResultsThirty-five clinical controlled trials were identified and included in the meta-analyses. Compared to minimal intervention, LLLT provided superior pain relief in chronic tendinopathy, with pooled SMD -0.57(95% confidence interval [CI] -0.93 to -0.20, <i>P</i> = 0.002) after sensitivity analysis (15 RCTs, 299 participants in the experimental group and 282 participants in the control group). Additionally, the total number of sessions was a significant predictor of the effect size of pain relief (<i>P</i> < 0.05), after adjusting for age.ConclusionsLLLT is more effective than minimal intervention for pain relief in chronic tendinopathy. Greater total number of treatment sessions may be associated with a greater extent of pain relief.OtherNo funding was received for this review. PROSPERO registration number (CRD42021256567).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251339104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251339104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251339104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,低水平激光治疗(LLLT)对肌腱病变疼痛的影响在临床试验中得到越来越多的评价。然而,关于其使用的相互矛盾的证据仍然存在。目的评价LLLT在肌腱病变治疗中对疼痛的影响,探讨LLLT参数对疼痛评分效应量的影响。方法从建库至2025年1月对8个数据库进行检索。在可能的情况下进行meta分析,使用固定效应或随机效应模型、标准化平均差异(SMDs)和异质性检验。采用多变量元回归来确定疼痛评分效应大小的显著预测因子。结果35项临床对照试验被纳入meta分析。与最小干预相比,LLLT在慢性肌腱病变中提供了更好的疼痛缓解,经敏感性分析(15项随机对照试验,实验组299名受试者,对照组282名受试者),综合SMD为-0.57(95%可信区间[CI] -0.93至-0.20,P = 0.002)。此外,总治疗次数是疼痛缓解效应大小的重要预测因子(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shedding more light on the short-term effect of low-level laser therapy on pain in tendinopathy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BackgroundIn recent years, the effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on pain in tendinopathy has been increasingly evaluated in clinical trials. However, conflicting evidence regarding its use persists.ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to evaluate the effect of LLLT on pain in the management of tendinopathy, and investigate the influence of LLLT parameters on the effect size of pain score.MethodsSearches of eight databases were conducted from inception to Jan 2025. Meta-analyses were conducted where possible, using either a fixed- or random-effects model, standardized mean differences (SMDs), and tests of heterogeneity. Multivariable meta-regression was performed to identify significant predictors of the effect size in pain score.ResultsThirty-five clinical controlled trials were identified and included in the meta-analyses. Compared to minimal intervention, LLLT provided superior pain relief in chronic tendinopathy, with pooled SMD -0.57(95% confidence interval [CI] -0.93 to -0.20, P = 0.002) after sensitivity analysis (15 RCTs, 299 participants in the experimental group and 282 participants in the control group). Additionally, the total number of sessions was a significant predictor of the effect size of pain relief (P < 0.05), after adjusting for age.ConclusionsLLLT is more effective than minimal intervention for pain relief in chronic tendinopathy. Greater total number of treatment sessions may be associated with a greater extent of pain relief.OtherNo funding was received for this review. PROSPERO registration number (CRD42021256567).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信