Jihye Koo, Gage Redler, Vladimir Semenenko, Stephen A Rosenberg, Emily Keit, Jacqueline M Andreozzi
{"title":"不同呼吸方式肺IGRT的6秒CBCT定位准确性。","authors":"Jihye Koo, Gage Redler, Vladimir Semenenko, Stephen A Rosenberg, Emily Keit, Jacqueline M Andreozzi","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 6-second cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition of the Ethos HyperSight (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA) on-board imaging system offers benefits, but could be too fast to accurately capture an average target position in a free-breathing lung cancer patient. This study aimed to ascertain whether a 6-second acquisition is appropriate for regularly breathing patients with varying respiration periods. Additionally, breathing patterns that could lead to clinically impactful inaccuracies for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) shifts were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine regular (sinusoidal) breathing patterns with different respiration rates (8-20 breaths-per-minute) and amplitudes, along with five irregular breathing patterns including a gasp/cough scenario, were tested using a respiratory motion phantom with a 3 cm diameter spherical target. Once the phantom was aligned using the external chassis to remove any default shifts, the 6-second CBCTs with Acuros reconstruction were acquired. Rigid registrations were performed using the 4DCT simulation average/untagged reconstructed image as reference to align to target (simulating clinical lung IGRT setup). Sixty-second CBCTs were also tested to verify the average offsets with conventional practice. The IGRT shifts were compared to 5 mm, a PTV margin typically used for lung tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal (<1.0 mm) shifts were observed for all regular breathing patterns with both 6-second and 60-second CBCT acquisitions. For moderately irregular breathing patterns and the gasp/cough scenario, all shifts were less than 5 mm. Shifts larger than 5 mm were observed in highly irregular breathing patterns, with both 6-second (14%) and 60-second (24%) CBCT acquisitions. Statistical tests showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the sizes of shifts made with the two CBCT durations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 6-second CBCT can effectively and reliably localize a mobile target for regular and moderately-irregular breathers. Cautions should be used for highly irregular breathers, regardless of the duration of CBCT acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Localization accuracy of 6-second CBCT for lung IGRT with various breathing patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Jihye Koo, Gage Redler, Vladimir Semenenko, Stephen A Rosenberg, Emily Keit, Jacqueline M Andreozzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 6-second cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition of the Ethos HyperSight (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA) on-board imaging system offers benefits, but could be too fast to accurately capture an average target position in a free-breathing lung cancer patient. This study aimed to ascertain whether a 6-second acquisition is appropriate for regularly breathing patients with varying respiration periods. Additionally, breathing patterns that could lead to clinically impactful inaccuracies for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) shifts were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine regular (sinusoidal) breathing patterns with different respiration rates (8-20 breaths-per-minute) and amplitudes, along with five irregular breathing patterns including a gasp/cough scenario, were tested using a respiratory motion phantom with a 3 cm diameter spherical target. Once the phantom was aligned using the external chassis to remove any default shifts, the 6-second CBCTs with Acuros reconstruction were acquired. Rigid registrations were performed using the 4DCT simulation average/untagged reconstructed image as reference to align to target (simulating clinical lung IGRT setup). Sixty-second CBCTs were also tested to verify the average offsets with conventional practice. The IGRT shifts were compared to 5 mm, a PTV margin typically used for lung tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal (<1.0 mm) shifts were observed for all regular breathing patterns with both 6-second and 60-second CBCT acquisitions. For moderately irregular breathing patterns and the gasp/cough scenario, all shifts were less than 5 mm. Shifts larger than 5 mm were observed in highly irregular breathing patterns, with both 6-second (14%) and 60-second (24%) CBCT acquisitions. Statistical tests showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the sizes of shifts made with the two CBCT durations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 6-second CBCT can effectively and reliably localize a mobile target for regular and moderately-irregular breathers. Cautions should be used for highly irregular breathers, regardless of the duration of CBCT acquisition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:Ethos HyperSight (Varian Medical Systems, Inc.)的6秒锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)。Palo Alto, CA, USA)机载成像系统提供了好处,但可能太快,无法准确捕获自由呼吸肺癌患者的平均目标位置。本研究旨在确定6秒获取是否适合具有不同呼吸周期的正常呼吸患者。此外,还研究了可能导致图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)移位的临床影响不准确的呼吸模式。方法:采用直径为3cm的球形靶呼吸运动模体,对不同呼吸频率(8-20次/分钟)和幅度的9种规律(正弦)呼吸模式,以及包括喘气/咳嗽场景在内的5种不规则呼吸模式进行测试。一旦使用外部底盘对齐幻影以消除任何默认偏移,就可以获得带有Acuros重建的6秒cbct。使用4DCT模拟平均/未标记重建图像作为参考进行刚性配准,以对准目标(模拟临床肺部IGRT设置)。还测试了62个cbct,以验证常规实践的平均偏移量。IGRT偏移量为5mm,这是肺肿瘤典型的PTV边缘。结果:两个CBCT持续时间的变化大小之间的差异最小(0.05)。结论:6秒CBCT可有效、可靠地定位正常和中度不规则呼吸者的移动靶标。对于高度不规则呼吸者,无论CBCT采集时间长短,都应采取谨慎措施。
Localization accuracy of 6-second CBCT for lung IGRT with various breathing patterns.
Purpose: The 6-second cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition of the Ethos HyperSight (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA) on-board imaging system offers benefits, but could be too fast to accurately capture an average target position in a free-breathing lung cancer patient. This study aimed to ascertain whether a 6-second acquisition is appropriate for regularly breathing patients with varying respiration periods. Additionally, breathing patterns that could lead to clinically impactful inaccuracies for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) shifts were investigated.
Methods: Nine regular (sinusoidal) breathing patterns with different respiration rates (8-20 breaths-per-minute) and amplitudes, along with five irregular breathing patterns including a gasp/cough scenario, were tested using a respiratory motion phantom with a 3 cm diameter spherical target. Once the phantom was aligned using the external chassis to remove any default shifts, the 6-second CBCTs with Acuros reconstruction were acquired. Rigid registrations were performed using the 4DCT simulation average/untagged reconstructed image as reference to align to target (simulating clinical lung IGRT setup). Sixty-second CBCTs were also tested to verify the average offsets with conventional practice. The IGRT shifts were compared to 5 mm, a PTV margin typically used for lung tumors.
Results: Minimal (<1.0 mm) shifts were observed for all regular breathing patterns with both 6-second and 60-second CBCT acquisitions. For moderately irregular breathing patterns and the gasp/cough scenario, all shifts were less than 5 mm. Shifts larger than 5 mm were observed in highly irregular breathing patterns, with both 6-second (14%) and 60-second (24%) CBCT acquisitions. Statistical tests showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the sizes of shifts made with the two CBCT durations.
Conclusion: The 6-second CBCT can effectively and reliably localize a mobile target for regular and moderately-irregular breathers. Cautions should be used for highly irregular breathers, regardless of the duration of CBCT acquisition.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic