女性盆腔器官脱垂三维重建后脱垂程度平面评价与POP-Q评分的相关性

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lifan Shen, Huijun Bai, Xueyu Sun, Ping Liu, Chunlin Chen
{"title":"女性盆腔器官脱垂三维重建后脱垂程度平面评价与POP-Q评分的相关性","authors":"Lifan Shen, Huijun Bai, Xueyu Sun, Ping Liu, Chunlin Chen","doi":"10.1159/000546464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to combine dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and form a plane based on osseous structures to evaluate the degree of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The correlation of this novel evaluation approach with the POP-Q system was assessed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 POP patients with POP-Q stage ≥ II. The dynamic MRI images of those patients were reconstructed in three dimensions. A plane was created by using the midpoint of the line between the inferior margins of the two pubic bones and the starting points of the superior margins of the bilateral sacrotuberous ligaments (the pubic inferior midpoint - sacrotuberous ligament starting point superior edge plane). Distances from the lowest point of the anterior vaginal wall, cervix, and rectal ampulla to this evaluation plane were measured, modeled, and categorized. The consistency and correlation of the categorized results with POP-Q scores were verified by performing a kappa analysis and Spearman's rank correlation analysis, respectively.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The highest consistency with POP-Q scores was found in the prolapse of the central pelvic cavity (kappa = 0.713, P < 0.05), followed by the anterior POP (kappa = 0.427, P < 0.05), and posterior POP (kappa = 0.261, P < 0.05), with all showing statistically significant differences. The strongest positive correlation was observed between central POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.864, P < 0.01), followed by posterior POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.710, P < 0.01), with both exhibiting a strong positive correlation. Anterior POP and POP-Q scores showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.586, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the proposed evaluation method were highly consistent in the anterior and central pelvic cavities and strongly correlated in the central and posterior pelvic cavities. In particular, the assessment of the posterior cavity showed a strong positive correlation with that of the POP-Q system. The evaluation plane demonstrated high consistency and correlation with the POP-Q system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between Plane Assessment of Prolapse Degree and POP-Q Scores after Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse.\",\"authors\":\"Lifan Shen, Huijun Bai, Xueyu Sun, Ping Liu, Chunlin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to combine dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and form a plane based on osseous structures to evaluate the degree of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The correlation of this novel evaluation approach with the POP-Q system was assessed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 POP patients with POP-Q stage ≥ II. The dynamic MRI images of those patients were reconstructed in three dimensions. A plane was created by using the midpoint of the line between the inferior margins of the two pubic bones and the starting points of the superior margins of the bilateral sacrotuberous ligaments (the pubic inferior midpoint - sacrotuberous ligament starting point superior edge plane). Distances from the lowest point of the anterior vaginal wall, cervix, and rectal ampulla to this evaluation plane were measured, modeled, and categorized. The consistency and correlation of the categorized results with POP-Q scores were verified by performing a kappa analysis and Spearman's rank correlation analysis, respectively.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The highest consistency with POP-Q scores was found in the prolapse of the central pelvic cavity (kappa = 0.713, P < 0.05), followed by the anterior POP (kappa = 0.427, P < 0.05), and posterior POP (kappa = 0.261, P < 0.05), with all showing statistically significant differences. The strongest positive correlation was observed between central POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.864, P < 0.01), followed by posterior POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.710, P < 0.01), with both exhibiting a strong positive correlation. Anterior POP and POP-Q scores showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.586, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the proposed evaluation method were highly consistent in the anterior and central pelvic cavities and strongly correlated in the central and posterior pelvic cavities. In particular, the assessment of the posterior cavity showed a strong positive correlation with that of the POP-Q system. The evaluation plane demonstrated high consistency and correlation with the POP-Q system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在将动态磁共振成像(MRI)与三维重建(3D)相结合,基于骨性结构形成一个平面来评估盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的程度。评估了这种新的评估方法与POP-Q系统的相关性。方法:对71例POP- q≥II期的POP患者进行回顾性分析。对患者的动态MRI图像进行三维重建。以两耻骨下缘与双侧骶结节韧带上缘起始点之间的连线中点为平面(耻骨下中点-骶结节韧带起始点上缘平面)。测量从阴道前壁最低点、子宫颈和直肠壶腹到该评估平面的距离,建立模型并进行分类。分类结果与POP-Q分数的一致性和相关性分别通过kappa分析和Spearman秩相关分析进行验证。结果:盆腔中央脱垂与POP- q评分一致性最高(kappa = 0.713, P < 0.05),其次为前路POP (kappa = 0.427, P < 0.05),后路POP (kappa = 0.261, P < 0.05),差异均有统计学意义。中心POP与POP- q评分呈显著正相关(r = 0.864, P < 0.01),后验POP与POP- q评分呈显著正相关(r = 0.710, P < 0.01)。前路POP与POP- q评分呈中度正相关(r = 0.586, P < 0.01)。结论:所提出的评价方法在盆腔前侧和中央侧的评价结果高度一致,在盆腔中央侧和盆腔后央侧的评价结果高度相关。特别是后腔的评估与POP-Q系统的评估有很强的正相关。评价平面与POP-Q系统具有较高的一致性和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between Plane Assessment of Prolapse Degree and POP-Q Scores after Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Objective: This study aimed to combine dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and form a plane based on osseous structures to evaluate the degree of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The correlation of this novel evaluation approach with the POP-Q system was assessed.

Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 POP patients with POP-Q stage ≥ II. The dynamic MRI images of those patients were reconstructed in three dimensions. A plane was created by using the midpoint of the line between the inferior margins of the two pubic bones and the starting points of the superior margins of the bilateral sacrotuberous ligaments (the pubic inferior midpoint - sacrotuberous ligament starting point superior edge plane). Distances from the lowest point of the anterior vaginal wall, cervix, and rectal ampulla to this evaluation plane were measured, modeled, and categorized. The consistency and correlation of the categorized results with POP-Q scores were verified by performing a kappa analysis and Spearman's rank correlation analysis, respectively.

Result: The highest consistency with POP-Q scores was found in the prolapse of the central pelvic cavity (kappa = 0.713, P < 0.05), followed by the anterior POP (kappa = 0.427, P < 0.05), and posterior POP (kappa = 0.261, P < 0.05), with all showing statistically significant differences. The strongest positive correlation was observed between central POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.864, P < 0.01), followed by posterior POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.710, P < 0.01), with both exhibiting a strong positive correlation. Anterior POP and POP-Q scores showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.586, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: The results of the proposed evaluation method were highly consistent in the anterior and central pelvic cavities and strongly correlated in the central and posterior pelvic cavities. In particular, the assessment of the posterior cavity showed a strong positive correlation with that of the POP-Q system. The evaluation plane demonstrated high consistency and correlation with the POP-Q system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信