头孢唑林在青霉素过敏患者与非青霉素过敏患者倾向匹配队列中的应用结果。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rajkishen Narayanan, Michael Carter, Gregory Toci, Rachel Huang, Jonathan Dalton, Amit Syal, Andrew Kim, Andrew Vanichkachorn, Asad Pasha, Matthew Sabitsky, Shiraz Mumtaz, Mark Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder
{"title":"头孢唑林在青霉素过敏患者与非青霉素过敏患者倾向匹配队列中的应用结果。","authors":"Rajkishen Narayanan, Michael Carter, Gregory Toci, Rachel Huang, Jonathan Dalton, Amit Syal, Andrew Kim, Andrew Vanichkachorn, Asad Pasha, Matthew Sabitsky, Shiraz Mumtaz, Mark Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder","doi":"10.1177/21925682251344907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveTo investigate whether cefazolin can be given to penicillin-allergic patients undergoing spine surgery without significantly increasing rates of allergic reactions. Additionally, we sought to determine if patients receiving cefazolin would be at increased risk of surgical site infection due to allergy-associated skin or wound reactions.MethodsPatients with a documented penicillin allergy who underwent lumbar fusion from 2017-2022 and received cefazolin for surgical prophylaxis were matched to a cohort of non-penicillin allergic patients. Length of surgery and in-hospital complications related to infections were recorded for each patient. Allergic reactions were recorded, in addition to all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30 and 90 day readmissions due to infectious etiologies and need for irrigation and debridement (I&D) surgery.Results254 penicillin-allergic patients were matched to 762 non-allergic patients. Penicillin- allergic patients had a comparable LOS when compared to non-allergic patients and had comparable incidences of respiratory complaints, sepsis, cellulitis, wound infections and all-cause mortality. While one penicillin-allergic patient was diagnosed with a mild drug-induced skin reaction, overall, cefazolin did not increase rates of allergic reactions compared to the non-allergic cohort. Cefazolin administration to penicillin allergic patients also did not significantly increase 90 day readmissions due to surgical site infections or need for subsequent I&D.ConclusionOur findings suggest that cefazolin can be safely administered to penicillin-allergic patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery without risk of cross-reactivity. Additionally, we found that cefazolin did not increase rates of non-surgical site infections or postoperative wound complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251344907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Cefazolin Administration in a Propensity Matched Cohort of Penicillin Allergic Patients Compared to Non-penicillin Allergic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Rajkishen Narayanan, Michael Carter, Gregory Toci, Rachel Huang, Jonathan Dalton, Amit Syal, Andrew Kim, Andrew Vanichkachorn, Asad Pasha, Matthew Sabitsky, Shiraz Mumtaz, Mark Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682251344907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveTo investigate whether cefazolin can be given to penicillin-allergic patients undergoing spine surgery without significantly increasing rates of allergic reactions. Additionally, we sought to determine if patients receiving cefazolin would be at increased risk of surgical site infection due to allergy-associated skin or wound reactions.MethodsPatients with a documented penicillin allergy who underwent lumbar fusion from 2017-2022 and received cefazolin for surgical prophylaxis were matched to a cohort of non-penicillin allergic patients. Length of surgery and in-hospital complications related to infections were recorded for each patient. Allergic reactions were recorded, in addition to all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30 and 90 day readmissions due to infectious etiologies and need for irrigation and debridement (I&D) surgery.Results254 penicillin-allergic patients were matched to 762 non-allergic patients. Penicillin- allergic patients had a comparable LOS when compared to non-allergic patients and had comparable incidences of respiratory complaints, sepsis, cellulitis, wound infections and all-cause mortality. While one penicillin-allergic patient was diagnosed with a mild drug-induced skin reaction, overall, cefazolin did not increase rates of allergic reactions compared to the non-allergic cohort. Cefazolin administration to penicillin allergic patients also did not significantly increase 90 day readmissions due to surgical site infections or need for subsequent I&D.ConclusionOur findings suggest that cefazolin can be safely administered to penicillin-allergic patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery without risk of cross-reactivity. Additionally, we found that cefazolin did not increase rates of non-surgical site infections or postoperative wound complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21925682251344907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251344907\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251344907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性队列研究。目的探讨脊柱外科青霉素过敏患者给予头孢唑林是否能不显著增加过敏反应发生率。此外,我们试图确定接受头孢唑林的患者是否会因过敏相关的皮肤或伤口反应而增加手术部位感染的风险。方法将2017-2022年间行腰椎融合术并接受头孢唑林手术预防的青霉素过敏患者与非青霉素过敏患者进行配对。记录每位患者的手术时间和与感染相关的住院并发症。除全因死亡率外,还记录了过敏反应、住院时间(LOS)、感染性病因导致的30天和90天再入院以及冲洗和清创(I&D)手术的需要。结果254例青霉素过敏患者与762例非青霉素过敏患者相匹配。青霉素过敏患者的LOS与非过敏患者相当,呼吸道疾病、败血症、蜂窝织炎、伤口感染和全因死亡率的发生率也相当。虽然一名青霉素过敏患者被诊断为轻度药物性皮肤反应,但总体而言,与非过敏组相比,头孢唑林并未增加过敏反应的发生率。青霉素过敏患者服用头孢唑林也不会显著增加因手术部位感染或后续I&D需要而导致的90天再入院率。结论头孢唑林可安全用于腰椎手术中青霉素过敏患者,且无交叉反应风险。此外,我们发现头孢唑林不会增加非手术部位感染或术后伤口并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Cefazolin Administration in a Propensity Matched Cohort of Penicillin Allergic Patients Compared to Non-penicillin Allergic Patients.

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveTo investigate whether cefazolin can be given to penicillin-allergic patients undergoing spine surgery without significantly increasing rates of allergic reactions. Additionally, we sought to determine if patients receiving cefazolin would be at increased risk of surgical site infection due to allergy-associated skin or wound reactions.MethodsPatients with a documented penicillin allergy who underwent lumbar fusion from 2017-2022 and received cefazolin for surgical prophylaxis were matched to a cohort of non-penicillin allergic patients. Length of surgery and in-hospital complications related to infections were recorded for each patient. Allergic reactions were recorded, in addition to all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30 and 90 day readmissions due to infectious etiologies and need for irrigation and debridement (I&D) surgery.Results254 penicillin-allergic patients were matched to 762 non-allergic patients. Penicillin- allergic patients had a comparable LOS when compared to non-allergic patients and had comparable incidences of respiratory complaints, sepsis, cellulitis, wound infections and all-cause mortality. While one penicillin-allergic patient was diagnosed with a mild drug-induced skin reaction, overall, cefazolin did not increase rates of allergic reactions compared to the non-allergic cohort. Cefazolin administration to penicillin allergic patients also did not significantly increase 90 day readmissions due to surgical site infections or need for subsequent I&D.ConclusionOur findings suggest that cefazolin can be safely administered to penicillin-allergic patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery without risk of cross-reactivity. Additionally, we found that cefazolin did not increase rates of non-surgical site infections or postoperative wound complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信