早产后肺容量、气体传递和振荡测量:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-05-28 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0151-2024
James T D Gibbons, Michael L Beaven, Christopher W Course, Sarah J Kotecha, Thomas Hixson, Melissa Zuidersma, Andrew C Wilson, Sailesh Kotecha, Shannon J Simpson
{"title":"早产后肺容量、气体传递和振荡测量:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"James T D Gibbons, Michael L Beaven, Christopher W Course, Sarah J Kotecha, Thomas Hixson, Melissa Zuidersma, Andrew C Wilson, Sailesh Kotecha, Shannon J Simpson","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0151-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small airway and lung parenchymal abnormalities frequently occur following preterm birth but are commonly missed by spirometry. Static lung volumes, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (<i>D</i> <sub>LCO</sub>) and oscillometry provide a more precise characterisation of these conditions. We hypothesised that differences in these measures exist between individuals born preterm and at term and we aimed to systematically review the literature to identify and quantify these differences in lung function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022320775) and guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards, searched six databases up to 29 December 2024. We included studies comparing lung function between preterm subjects and term controls <i>via</i> static lung volumes, gas transfer or oscillometry. Differences in lung function were analysed using random-effects meta-analysis to compute the standardised mean difference (SMD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 12 143 titles, we analysed 52 cohorts with static lung volumes, 37 with gas transfer and 18 with oscillometry data. While total lung capacity was similar between preterm and term cohorts (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.004), preterm participants showed increased residual volume (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.44) and residual volume/total lung capacity (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.63). <i>D</i> <sub>LCO</sub> was lower in preterm cohorts (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.38). Preterm cohorts also demonstrated increased airway resistance at 5/6 Hz (SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.67), difference between airway resistance at 5/6 Hz and 20 Hz (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.96), resonant frequency (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.15) and area under the reactance curve (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.88).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We demonstrate that preterm birth is linked to notable abnormalities in static lung volumes, gas transfer and oscillometry, underscoring the necessity of employing comprehensive pulmonary function tests beyond spirometry to monitor and address long-term respiratory outcomes effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 176","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung volumes, gas transfer and oscillometry after preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"James T D Gibbons, Michael L Beaven, Christopher W Course, Sarah J Kotecha, Thomas Hixson, Melissa Zuidersma, Andrew C Wilson, Sailesh Kotecha, Shannon J Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/16000617.0151-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small airway and lung parenchymal abnormalities frequently occur following preterm birth but are commonly missed by spirometry. Static lung volumes, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (<i>D</i> <sub>LCO</sub>) and oscillometry provide a more precise characterisation of these conditions. We hypothesised that differences in these measures exist between individuals born preterm and at term and we aimed to systematically review the literature to identify and quantify these differences in lung function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022320775) and guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards, searched six databases up to 29 December 2024. We included studies comparing lung function between preterm subjects and term controls <i>via</i> static lung volumes, gas transfer or oscillometry. Differences in lung function were analysed using random-effects meta-analysis to compute the standardised mean difference (SMD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 12 143 titles, we analysed 52 cohorts with static lung volumes, 37 with gas transfer and 18 with oscillometry data. While total lung capacity was similar between preterm and term cohorts (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.004), preterm participants showed increased residual volume (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.44) and residual volume/total lung capacity (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.63). <i>D</i> <sub>LCO</sub> was lower in preterm cohorts (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.38). Preterm cohorts also demonstrated increased airway resistance at 5/6 Hz (SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.67), difference between airway resistance at 5/6 Hz and 20 Hz (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.96), resonant frequency (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.15) and area under the reactance curve (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.88).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We demonstrate that preterm birth is linked to notable abnormalities in static lung volumes, gas transfer and oscillometry, underscoring the necessity of employing comprehensive pulmonary function tests beyond spirometry to monitor and address long-term respiratory outcomes effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"volume\":\"34 176\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117382/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0151-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0151-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小气道和肺实质异常常发生在早产后,但通常被肺活量测定遗漏。静态肺体积、肺一氧化碳弥散量(dlco)和振荡测量法可以更精确地描述这些情况。我们假设这些指标在早产儿和足月出生的个体之间存在差异,我们旨在系统地回顾文献以确定和量化肺功能的这些差异。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析在普洛斯彼罗注册(CRD42022320775),以系统评价和荟萃分析标准的首选报告项目为指导,检索了6个数据库,截至2024年12月29日。我们纳入了通过静态肺容量、气体传输或振荡测量法比较早产儿和足月对照组肺功能的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析分析肺功能差异,计算标准化平均差异(SMD)。结果:从12143篇论文中,我们分析了52组静态肺容量,37组气体传输和18组振荡测量数据。虽然总肺活量在早产儿组和足月组之间相似(SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.17至0.004),但早产儿组显示残余肺活量(SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.19至0.44)和残余肺活量/总肺活量(SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.28至0.63)增加。早产儿组的LCO较低(SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.64至-0.38)。早产儿队列也表现出5/6 Hz时气道阻力增加(SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.22至0.67),5/6 Hz和20 Hz时气道阻力差异(SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.07至0.96),共振频率(SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.12至1.15)和电抗曲线下面积(SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.35至0.88)。解释:我们证明,早产与静态肺容量、气体传递和振荡测量的显著异常有关,强调了在肺活量测定之外采用综合肺功能测试来有效监测和解决长期呼吸结局的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung volumes, gas transfer and oscillometry after preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Small airway and lung parenchymal abnormalities frequently occur following preterm birth but are commonly missed by spirometry. Static lung volumes, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) and oscillometry provide a more precise characterisation of these conditions. We hypothesised that differences in these measures exist between individuals born preterm and at term and we aimed to systematically review the literature to identify and quantify these differences in lung function.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022320775) and guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards, searched six databases up to 29 December 2024. We included studies comparing lung function between preterm subjects and term controls via static lung volumes, gas transfer or oscillometry. Differences in lung function were analysed using random-effects meta-analysis to compute the standardised mean difference (SMD).

Results: From 12 143 titles, we analysed 52 cohorts with static lung volumes, 37 with gas transfer and 18 with oscillometry data. While total lung capacity was similar between preterm and term cohorts (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.004), preterm participants showed increased residual volume (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.44) and residual volume/total lung capacity (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.63). D LCO was lower in preterm cohorts (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.38). Preterm cohorts also demonstrated increased airway resistance at 5/6 Hz (SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.67), difference between airway resistance at 5/6 Hz and 20 Hz (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.96), resonant frequency (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.15) and area under the reactance curve (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.88).

Interpretation: We demonstrate that preterm birth is linked to notable abnormalities in static lung volumes, gas transfer and oscillometry, underscoring the necessity of employing comprehensive pulmonary function tests beyond spirometry to monitor and address long-term respiratory outcomes effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信