Lucas M. Donovan , Laura C. Feemster , Margaret P. Collins , Emily E. Gleason , Kevin Josey , Kevin I. Duan , Robert Plumley , Scott Coggeshall , Travis Hee Wai , Valentina Petrova , Logan Trenaman , Melissa Atwood , Philip Ballance , Arianne K. Baldomero , Fiona Gillen , Jennifer Gunter , Julianne Isaac , Henna Kara , Kenneth W. Kizer , Allison A. Lambert , David H. Au
{"title":"一项旨在提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(EQuiP-COPD)质量、安全性和患者体验的实用试验方案。","authors":"Lucas M. Donovan , Laura C. Feemster , Margaret P. Collins , Emily E. Gleason , Kevin Josey , Kevin I. Duan , Robert Plumley , Scott Coggeshall , Travis Hee Wai , Valentina Petrova , Logan Trenaman , Melissa Atwood , Philip Ballance , Arianne K. Baldomero , Fiona Gillen , Jennifer Gunter , Julianne Isaac , Henna Kara , Kenneth W. Kizer , Allison A. Lambert , David H. Au","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects nearly 26 million Americans, causes functional impairment and reduced quality of life, and is the fifth leading cause of death. Evidence-based therapies can reduce morbidity and improve symptoms, but too few patients receive them. Moreover, many patients receive unnecessary treatments that increase risks of harm. Systematic and population-based approaches are needed to address the widespread gaps in care. Among these, high-quality evidence shows that proactive electronic consultations to primary care providers can improve COPD care quality and clinical outcomes. While effective, these strategies rely on pulmonary specialists who are a scarce and costly resource nationwide. Given their relevant expertise, there is increasing interest around clinical pharmacist-led population management of COPD, but the effectiveness of this approach is unclear. We designed the cluster-randomized EQuiP-COPD trial to test the non-inferiority of clinical pharmacist relative to pulmonary specialist-led population health management of COPD. The primary outcome is the composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, all-cause hospitalization, or death. Secondary outcomes will compare disease-related quality of life, quality of care, costs incurred by patients and caregivers, and heterogeneity of treatment effect. We will also conduct qualitative interviews among patients and staff to elicit experiences with the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 107961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for a pragmatic trial to enhance quality safety, and patient experience in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (EQuiP-COPD)\",\"authors\":\"Lucas M. Donovan , Laura C. Feemster , Margaret P. Collins , Emily E. Gleason , Kevin Josey , Kevin I. Duan , Robert Plumley , Scott Coggeshall , Travis Hee Wai , Valentina Petrova , Logan Trenaman , Melissa Atwood , Philip Ballance , Arianne K. Baldomero , Fiona Gillen , Jennifer Gunter , Julianne Isaac , Henna Kara , Kenneth W. Kizer , Allison A. Lambert , David H. Au\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects nearly 26 million Americans, causes functional impairment and reduced quality of life, and is the fifth leading cause of death. Evidence-based therapies can reduce morbidity and improve symptoms, but too few patients receive them. Moreover, many patients receive unnecessary treatments that increase risks of harm. Systematic and population-based approaches are needed to address the widespread gaps in care. Among these, high-quality evidence shows that proactive electronic consultations to primary care providers can improve COPD care quality and clinical outcomes. While effective, these strategies rely on pulmonary specialists who are a scarce and costly resource nationwide. Given their relevant expertise, there is increasing interest around clinical pharmacist-led population management of COPD, but the effectiveness of this approach is unclear. We designed the cluster-randomized EQuiP-COPD trial to test the non-inferiority of clinical pharmacist relative to pulmonary specialist-led population health management of COPD. The primary outcome is the composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, all-cause hospitalization, or death. Secondary outcomes will compare disease-related quality of life, quality of care, costs incurred by patients and caregivers, and heterogeneity of treatment effect. We will also conduct qualitative interviews among patients and staff to elicit experiences with the intervention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425001557\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425001557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protocol for a pragmatic trial to enhance quality safety, and patient experience in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (EQuiP-COPD)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects nearly 26 million Americans, causes functional impairment and reduced quality of life, and is the fifth leading cause of death. Evidence-based therapies can reduce morbidity and improve symptoms, but too few patients receive them. Moreover, many patients receive unnecessary treatments that increase risks of harm. Systematic and population-based approaches are needed to address the widespread gaps in care. Among these, high-quality evidence shows that proactive electronic consultations to primary care providers can improve COPD care quality and clinical outcomes. While effective, these strategies rely on pulmonary specialists who are a scarce and costly resource nationwide. Given their relevant expertise, there is increasing interest around clinical pharmacist-led population management of COPD, but the effectiveness of this approach is unclear. We designed the cluster-randomized EQuiP-COPD trial to test the non-inferiority of clinical pharmacist relative to pulmonary specialist-led population health management of COPD. The primary outcome is the composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, all-cause hospitalization, or death. Secondary outcomes will compare disease-related quality of life, quality of care, costs incurred by patients and caregivers, and heterogeneity of treatment effect. We will also conduct qualitative interviews among patients and staff to elicit experiences with the intervention.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.