在新西兰发展一个文化上知情的远程精神病学能力框架:一个横断面调查和因素分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Alisha Vara, Yan Chen, Etuini Ma'u, Rodrigo Ramalho, Mark Lawrence, Gary Cheung
{"title":"在新西兰发展一个文化上知情的远程精神病学能力框架:一个横断面调查和因素分析。","authors":"Alisha Vara, Yan Chen, Etuini Ma'u, Rodrigo Ramalho, Mark Lawrence, Gary Cheung","doi":"10.1177/10398562251345313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telepsychiatry use in New Zealand. This study aimed to survey New Zealand psychiatrists and trainees' perception of their telepsychiatry competencies; the importance of these competencies when providing a culturally responsive telepsychiatry service; and to ascertain if the competency items converged to dimensions developed from a previous qualitative study.MethodsNew Zealand psychiatrists and trainees completed an anonymised online questionnaire comprising 20 competency statements. Participants rated each statement on a scale from 0 (low level competence/importance) to 100 (high level competence/importance): (1) How competent do you believe you are? (2) How important is this competency when providing a culturally responsive telepsychiatry service? A principal components factor analysis with Varimax Rotation was conducted on the importance ratings.ResultsEighty-six participants (47.7% female) participated. The factor analysis revealed four new domains: Cultural Safety, Infrastructure and Technology, Professional Development and Ethics, and Clinical Practice. These new domains explained 64.9% of the total variance. Their internal consistencies were acceptable (alpha≥0.70) except for self-rated competence in the Clinical Practice domain (alpha = 0.68).ConclusionThis competency framework could be used to develop educational curricula and training resources to improve culturally responsive telepsychiatry practice in Aotearoa.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562251345313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a culturally informed telepsychiatry competency framework for aotearoa New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey and factor analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alisha Vara, Yan Chen, Etuini Ma'u, Rodrigo Ramalho, Mark Lawrence, Gary Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10398562251345313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telepsychiatry use in New Zealand. This study aimed to survey New Zealand psychiatrists and trainees' perception of their telepsychiatry competencies; the importance of these competencies when providing a culturally responsive telepsychiatry service; and to ascertain if the competency items converged to dimensions developed from a previous qualitative study.MethodsNew Zealand psychiatrists and trainees completed an anonymised online questionnaire comprising 20 competency statements. Participants rated each statement on a scale from 0 (low level competence/importance) to 100 (high level competence/importance): (1) How competent do you believe you are? (2) How important is this competency when providing a culturally responsive telepsychiatry service? A principal components factor analysis with Varimax Rotation was conducted on the importance ratings.ResultsEighty-six participants (47.7% female) participated. The factor analysis revealed four new domains: Cultural Safety, Infrastructure and Technology, Professional Development and Ethics, and Clinical Practice. These new domains explained 64.9% of the total variance. Their internal consistencies were acceptable (alpha≥0.70) except for self-rated competence in the Clinical Practice domain (alpha = 0.68).ConclusionThis competency framework could be used to develop educational curricula and training resources to improve culturally responsive telepsychiatry practice in Aotearoa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10398562251345313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251345313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251345313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行加速了新西兰远程精神病学的使用。摘要本研究旨在调查新西兰精神科医师和学员对其远程精神病学能力的认知;在提供符合文化的远程精神病学服务时,这些能力的重要性;并确定胜任力项目是否收敛于先前定性研究中开发的维度。方法新西兰精神科医生和培训生完成一份包含20项能力陈述的匿名在线问卷。参与者对每个陈述进行评分,从0(低水平能力/重要性)到100(高水平能力/重要性)。(1)你认为自己有多胜任?(2)在提供对文化有反应的远程精神病学服务时,这种能力有多重要?利用Varimax Rotation对重要度进行主成分因子分析。结果共86名参与者参加,其中女性占47.7%。因子分析揭示了四个新的领域:文化安全、基础设施和技术、职业发展和道德以及临床实践。这些新域解释了总方差的64.9%。他们的内部一致性是可以接受的(alpha≥0.70),除了临床实践领域的自评能力(alpha = 0.68)。结论该胜任力框架可用于制定教育课程和培训资源,以提高奥特罗阿地区远程精神病学的文化响应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a culturally informed telepsychiatry competency framework for aotearoa New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey and factor analysis.

ObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telepsychiatry use in New Zealand. This study aimed to survey New Zealand psychiatrists and trainees' perception of their telepsychiatry competencies; the importance of these competencies when providing a culturally responsive telepsychiatry service; and to ascertain if the competency items converged to dimensions developed from a previous qualitative study.MethodsNew Zealand psychiatrists and trainees completed an anonymised online questionnaire comprising 20 competency statements. Participants rated each statement on a scale from 0 (low level competence/importance) to 100 (high level competence/importance): (1) How competent do you believe you are? (2) How important is this competency when providing a culturally responsive telepsychiatry service? A principal components factor analysis with Varimax Rotation was conducted on the importance ratings.ResultsEighty-six participants (47.7% female) participated. The factor analysis revealed four new domains: Cultural Safety, Infrastructure and Technology, Professional Development and Ethics, and Clinical Practice. These new domains explained 64.9% of the total variance. Their internal consistencies were acceptable (alpha≥0.70) except for self-rated competence in the Clinical Practice domain (alpha = 0.68).ConclusionThis competency framework could be used to develop educational curricula and training resources to improve culturally responsive telepsychiatry practice in Aotearoa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信