改进基于氨基反应性的呼吸致敏剂鉴定。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Martin Simoneit, Helene Langer, Nadin Ulrich, Alexander Böhme
{"title":"改进基于氨基反应性的呼吸致敏剂鉴定。","authors":"Martin Simoneit, Helene Langer, Nadin Ulrich, Alexander Böhme","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sensitization of the respiratory tract may lead to various pulmonary diseases such as asthma. It can be triggered by the chemical reaction of organic electrophiles with nucleophiles of lung proteins with amino groups being of particular interest in this case. For assessing the dermal sensitization potential of chemicals, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has become an OECD-accepted nonanimal test system. However, issues with the identification of known respiratory sensitizers such as isocyanates and anhydrides based on their amino reactivity in the DPRA have been reported. Hence, in this study the chemoassay employing glycine-<i>para</i>-nitroanilide (Gly-pNA) as model nucleophile is applied to eight iso(thio)cyanates, seven anhydrides, four dinitrobenzenes, one triazine, five acrylates, glutaraldehyde, and chloramine T to quantify their amino reactivity in terms of the second order rate constant <i>k</i><sub>Gly</sub> and the DPRA-like 24 h percent depletion <i>D</i><sub>Gly</sub>. A comparison of <i>D</i><sub>Gly</sub> with respective DPRA amino reactivity data (<i>D</i><sub>DPRA</sub>) showed that in particular iso(thio)cyanates and anhydrides are substantially more reactive toward Gly-pNA. This can be rationalized by the unintentional and so far not considered reaction of the test compounds with the ammonium acetate buffer used for DPRA testing. A detailed analysis of this reaction includes half-lives and analytically determined adduct patterns and indicates that it can hamper the envisaged depletion of the DPRA amino nucleophile. Finally, the obtained log <i>k</i><sub>Gly</sub> values range from -3.73 to ≥ 4.52 and allow for an improved identification of respiratory sensitizers. Hence, the Gly-pNA chemoassay may serve as a nonanimal screening method as one part of a mechanism-informed integrated testing and assessment strategy for respiratory sensitizers.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining the Amino Reactivity-Based Identification of Respiratory Sensitizers.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Simoneit, Helene Langer, Nadin Ulrich, Alexander Böhme\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The sensitization of the respiratory tract may lead to various pulmonary diseases such as asthma. It can be triggered by the chemical reaction of organic electrophiles with nucleophiles of lung proteins with amino groups being of particular interest in this case. For assessing the dermal sensitization potential of chemicals, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has become an OECD-accepted nonanimal test system. However, issues with the identification of known respiratory sensitizers such as isocyanates and anhydrides based on their amino reactivity in the DPRA have been reported. Hence, in this study the chemoassay employing glycine-<i>para</i>-nitroanilide (Gly-pNA) as model nucleophile is applied to eight iso(thio)cyanates, seven anhydrides, four dinitrobenzenes, one triazine, five acrylates, glutaraldehyde, and chloramine T to quantify their amino reactivity in terms of the second order rate constant <i>k</i><sub>Gly</sub> and the DPRA-like 24 h percent depletion <i>D</i><sub>Gly</sub>. A comparison of <i>D</i><sub>Gly</sub> with respective DPRA amino reactivity data (<i>D</i><sub>DPRA</sub>) showed that in particular iso(thio)cyanates and anhydrides are substantially more reactive toward Gly-pNA. This can be rationalized by the unintentional and so far not considered reaction of the test compounds with the ammonium acetate buffer used for DPRA testing. A detailed analysis of this reaction includes half-lives and analytically determined adduct patterns and indicates that it can hamper the envisaged depletion of the DPRA amino nucleophile. Finally, the obtained log <i>k</i><sub>Gly</sub> values range from -3.73 to ≥ 4.52 and allow for an improved identification of respiratory sensitizers. Hence, the Gly-pNA chemoassay may serve as a nonanimal screening method as one part of a mechanism-informed integrated testing and assessment strategy for respiratory sensitizers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00545\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼吸道的敏化可导致各种肺部疾病,如哮喘。它可以由有机亲电试剂与肺蛋白的亲核试剂的化学反应触发,在这种情况下氨基是特别感兴趣的。为了评估化学物质的皮肤致敏潜力,直接肽反应性测定(dpa)已成为经合组织认可的非动物试验系统。然而,根据dpa中的氨基反应性来鉴定已知的呼吸致敏剂如异氰酸酯和酸酐存在问题。因此,在本研究中,以甘氨酸-对硝基苯胺(Gly-pNA)为模型亲核试剂的化学分析应用于8种异硫氰酸酯、7种酸酐、4种二硝基苯、1种三嗪、5种丙烯酸酯、戊二醛和氯胺T,以二级速率常数kGly和类似dpra的24%耗散DGly来量化它们的氨基反应性。DGly与各自的DPRA氨基反应性数据(DDPRA)的比较表明,特别是异(硫)氰酸酯和酸酐对Gly-pNA的反应性更强。这可以通过无意和迄今未考虑的测试化合物与用于dpa测试的醋酸铵缓冲液的反应来合理化。对该反应的详细分析包括半衰期和分析确定的加合物模式,并表明它可以阻碍所设想的DPRA氨基亲核试剂的耗竭。最后,得到的log kGly值范围从-3.73到≥4.52,可以更好地识别呼吸致敏物。因此,Gly-pNA化学测定可以作为一种非动物筛选方法,作为呼吸致敏物机制信息综合测试和评估策略的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining the Amino Reactivity-Based Identification of Respiratory Sensitizers.

The sensitization of the respiratory tract may lead to various pulmonary diseases such as asthma. It can be triggered by the chemical reaction of organic electrophiles with nucleophiles of lung proteins with amino groups being of particular interest in this case. For assessing the dermal sensitization potential of chemicals, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has become an OECD-accepted nonanimal test system. However, issues with the identification of known respiratory sensitizers such as isocyanates and anhydrides based on their amino reactivity in the DPRA have been reported. Hence, in this study the chemoassay employing glycine-para-nitroanilide (Gly-pNA) as model nucleophile is applied to eight iso(thio)cyanates, seven anhydrides, four dinitrobenzenes, one triazine, five acrylates, glutaraldehyde, and chloramine T to quantify their amino reactivity in terms of the second order rate constant kGly and the DPRA-like 24 h percent depletion DGly. A comparison of DGly with respective DPRA amino reactivity data (DDPRA) showed that in particular iso(thio)cyanates and anhydrides are substantially more reactive toward Gly-pNA. This can be rationalized by the unintentional and so far not considered reaction of the test compounds with the ammonium acetate buffer used for DPRA testing. A detailed analysis of this reaction includes half-lives and analytically determined adduct patterns and indicates that it can hamper the envisaged depletion of the DPRA amino nucleophile. Finally, the obtained log kGly values range from -3.73 to ≥ 4.52 and allow for an improved identification of respiratory sensitizers. Hence, the Gly-pNA chemoassay may serve as a nonanimal screening method as one part of a mechanism-informed integrated testing and assessment strategy for respiratory sensitizers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信