随着倡导团体的动员,平等执法处于平衡状态

Gary Enos
{"title":"随着倡导团体的动员,平等执法处于平衡状态","authors":"Gary Enos","doi":"10.1002/mhw.34471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Trump administration's decision not to defend the provisions of the mental health parity final rule that took effect last year has left the advocacy community scrambling to identify options for maintaining parity's momentum. While it doesn't appear that all parity enforcement activity at the federal level has ceased, there remains great concern that the current regulatory environment in Washington gives insurers free rein to block access to necessary behavioral health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":100916,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Weekly","volume":"35 22","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parity enforcement hangs in balance as advocacy community mobilizes\",\"authors\":\"Gary Enos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhw.34471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Trump administration's decision not to defend the provisions of the mental health parity final rule that took effect last year has left the advocacy community scrambling to identify options for maintaining parity's momentum. While it doesn't appear that all parity enforcement activity at the federal level has ceased, there remains great concern that the current regulatory environment in Washington gives insurers free rein to block access to necessary behavioral health services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"volume\":\"35 22\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特朗普政府决定不为去年生效的精神健康平等最终规则的条款辩护,这让倡导团体争先恐后地寻找维持平等势头的选择。虽然联邦层面的所有平等执法活动似乎并没有停止,但人们仍然非常担心,华盛顿目前的监管环境使保险公司可以自由地阻止获得必要的行为健康服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parity enforcement hangs in balance as advocacy community mobilizes

The Trump administration's decision not to defend the provisions of the mental health parity final rule that took effect last year has left the advocacy community scrambling to identify options for maintaining parity's momentum. While it doesn't appear that all parity enforcement activity at the federal level has ceased, there remains great concern that the current regulatory environment in Washington gives insurers free rein to block access to necessary behavioral health services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信