使用COM-B模型对2型糖尿病患者药物依从性相关因素进行定性研究的最佳拟合框架综合

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Vivien Teo, John Weinman, Kai Zhen Yap
{"title":"使用COM-B模型对2型糖尿病患者药物依从性相关因素进行定性研究的最佳拟合框架综合","authors":"Vivien Teo,&nbsp;John Weinman,&nbsp;Kai Zhen Yap","doi":"10.1111/bcp.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This review aimed to synthesize factors associated with medication nonadherence among people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D), using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model as the a priori model.</p><p>Studies published between January 2014 and April 2024 were searched on five databases. Studies were included if they recruited PwT2D aged &gt;18 years, investigated factors associated with adherence to oral and/or nonoral medications for diabetes, used qualitative research methods, were conducted in a community setting, were in English language and had accessible full-text articles. Best fit framework synthesis was undertaken, which led to the development of a hypothesized COM-B variant model specific to medication nonadherence among PwT2D. Study quality was assessed using published criteria to evaluate whether the study was adequately reported.</p><p>Twenty-two studies were included. Factors were mapped onto the COM-B model: physical capability (e.g., difficulty injecting insulin independently), psychological capability (e.g., understanding about diabetes), physical opportunity (e.g., cost of medication), social opportunity (e.g., quality of communication and relationship with healthcare providers), automatic motivation (e.g., habit formation) and reflective motivation (e.g., perceived necessity and effectiveness of medications). Reflective motivation had the most themes, while physical capability only had one theme. Personality was a theme that could not be mapped onto the model. Interactions between some COM-B components (e.g., capability and motivation) were observed.</p><p>This theoretically grounded synthesis may facilitate future intervention development by formulating a programme theory and identifying behaviour change techniques to address the identified factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"91 6","pages":"1675-1691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best fit framework synthesis of qualitative studies on factors associated with medication nonadherence in people with type 2 diabetes using the COM-B model\",\"authors\":\"Vivien Teo,&nbsp;John Weinman,&nbsp;Kai Zhen Yap\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.70059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This review aimed to synthesize factors associated with medication nonadherence among people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D), using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model as the a priori model.</p><p>Studies published between January 2014 and April 2024 were searched on five databases. Studies were included if they recruited PwT2D aged &gt;18 years, investigated factors associated with adherence to oral and/or nonoral medications for diabetes, used qualitative research methods, were conducted in a community setting, were in English language and had accessible full-text articles. Best fit framework synthesis was undertaken, which led to the development of a hypothesized COM-B variant model specific to medication nonadherence among PwT2D. Study quality was assessed using published criteria to evaluate whether the study was adequately reported.</p><p>Twenty-two studies were included. Factors were mapped onto the COM-B model: physical capability (e.g., difficulty injecting insulin independently), psychological capability (e.g., understanding about diabetes), physical opportunity (e.g., cost of medication), social opportunity (e.g., quality of communication and relationship with healthcare providers), automatic motivation (e.g., habit formation) and reflective motivation (e.g., perceived necessity and effectiveness of medications). Reflective motivation had the most themes, while physical capability only had one theme. Personality was a theme that could not be mapped onto the model. Interactions between some COM-B components (e.g., capability and motivation) were observed.</p><p>This theoretically grounded synthesis may facilitate future intervention development by formulating a programme theory and identifying behaviour change techniques to address the identified factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"91 6\",\"pages\":\"1675-1691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.70059\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.70059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述旨在利用能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)模型作为先验模型,综合与2型糖尿病患者(PwT2D)药物依从性相关的因素。2014年1月至2024年4月期间发表的研究在五个数据库中进行了检索。纳入的研究包括:招募年龄在18岁的PwT2D,调查与糖尿病口服和/或非口服药物依从性相关的因素,采用定性研究方法,在社区环境中进行,使用英语,并有可访问的全文文章。我们进行了最佳拟合框架合成,从而建立了针对PwT2D患者药物不依从的COM-B变异模型。研究质量采用已发表的标准来评估研究是否被充分报道。纳入了22项研究。将因素映射到COM-B模型:身体能力(例如,独立注射胰岛素困难)、心理能力(例如,对糖尿病的了解)、身体机会(例如,药物成本)、社会机会(例如,与医疗保健提供者的沟通质量和关系)、自动动机(例如,习惯形成)和反思动机(例如,感知药物的必要性和有效性)。反思动机有最多的主题,而身体能力只有一个主题。个性是一个不能映射到模型上的主题。观察到一些COM-B组件(例如,能力和动机)之间的相互作用。这种基于理论的综合可以通过制定方案理论和确定行为改变技术来解决已确定的因素,从而促进未来干预措施的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best fit framework synthesis of qualitative studies on factors associated with medication nonadherence in people with type 2 diabetes using the COM-B model

This review aimed to synthesize factors associated with medication nonadherence among people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D), using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model as the a priori model.

Studies published between January 2014 and April 2024 were searched on five databases. Studies were included if they recruited PwT2D aged >18 years, investigated factors associated with adherence to oral and/or nonoral medications for diabetes, used qualitative research methods, were conducted in a community setting, were in English language and had accessible full-text articles. Best fit framework synthesis was undertaken, which led to the development of a hypothesized COM-B variant model specific to medication nonadherence among PwT2D. Study quality was assessed using published criteria to evaluate whether the study was adequately reported.

Twenty-two studies were included. Factors were mapped onto the COM-B model: physical capability (e.g., difficulty injecting insulin independently), psychological capability (e.g., understanding about diabetes), physical opportunity (e.g., cost of medication), social opportunity (e.g., quality of communication and relationship with healthcare providers), automatic motivation (e.g., habit formation) and reflective motivation (e.g., perceived necessity and effectiveness of medications). Reflective motivation had the most themes, while physical capability only had one theme. Personality was a theme that could not be mapped onto the model. Interactions between some COM-B components (e.g., capability and motivation) were observed.

This theoretically grounded synthesis may facilitate future intervention development by formulating a programme theory and identifying behaviour change techniques to address the identified factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信