{"title":"重访超声软标记非整倍体:在低风险和筛选naïve印度产前妇女深思熟虑的分析","authors":"Shreya Das, Charu Sharma, Taruna Yadav, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh, Garima Yadav, Dolat Singh Shekhawat, Kuldeep Singh, Manisha Jhirwal, Manoj Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.1111/cga.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence of soft markers on second-trimester sonography in low-risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women and determine their association with aneuploidy. Soft markers were evaluated through ultrasound, and likelihood ratios (LRs) and modified risk (MR) for aneuploidy were calculated. Pregnant women with a MR >1:250 underwent genetic counseling and invasive testing, whereas those with a lower risk received follow-up. Associations were estimated via Fisher's exact test. A total of 4051 anomaly scans were reviewed, among which 207 (5.1%) women were found to have soft markers (SMs). These included 153 (3.7%) isolated SMs, 43 (1.06%) multiple SMs, and 11 (0.2%) SMs with structural abnormalities. The most common SM was renal pyelectasis. Invasive test uptake increased by 25% among pregnancies with isolated markers and by 55% for those with multiple SMs. A significant association was found between isolated short femur and aneuploidy (<i>p</i> = 0.026), and between multiple SMs and aneuploidy (<i>p</i> = 0.039). Soft markers in low-risk couples can lead to unnecessary invasive testing and anxiety. Genetic counseling is important for discussing relevant factors. Invasive testing for aneuploidies should be based on the modified risk, the presence of multiple SMs, or structural anomalies on ultrasonography.</p>","PeriodicalId":10626,"journal":{"name":"Congenital Anomalies","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy: A thoughtful analysis in low-risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women\",\"authors\":\"Shreya Das, Charu Sharma, Taruna Yadav, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh, Garima Yadav, Dolat Singh Shekhawat, Kuldeep Singh, Manisha Jhirwal, Manoj Kumar Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cga.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence of soft markers on second-trimester sonography in low-risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women and determine their association with aneuploidy. Soft markers were evaluated through ultrasound, and likelihood ratios (LRs) and modified risk (MR) for aneuploidy were calculated. Pregnant women with a MR >1:250 underwent genetic counseling and invasive testing, whereas those with a lower risk received follow-up. Associations were estimated via Fisher's exact test. A total of 4051 anomaly scans were reviewed, among which 207 (5.1%) women were found to have soft markers (SMs). These included 153 (3.7%) isolated SMs, 43 (1.06%) multiple SMs, and 11 (0.2%) SMs with structural abnormalities. The most common SM was renal pyelectasis. Invasive test uptake increased by 25% among pregnancies with isolated markers and by 55% for those with multiple SMs. A significant association was found between isolated short femur and aneuploidy (<i>p</i> = 0.026), and between multiple SMs and aneuploidy (<i>p</i> = 0.039). Soft markers in low-risk couples can lead to unnecessary invasive testing and anxiety. Genetic counseling is important for discussing relevant factors. Invasive testing for aneuploidies should be based on the modified risk, the presence of multiple SMs, or structural anomalies on ultrasonography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Congenital Anomalies\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Congenital Anomalies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cga.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congenital Anomalies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cga.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revisiting ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy: A thoughtful analysis in low-risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of soft markers on second-trimester sonography in low-risk and screening naïve Indian antenatal women and determine their association with aneuploidy. Soft markers were evaluated through ultrasound, and likelihood ratios (LRs) and modified risk (MR) for aneuploidy were calculated. Pregnant women with a MR >1:250 underwent genetic counseling and invasive testing, whereas those with a lower risk received follow-up. Associations were estimated via Fisher's exact test. A total of 4051 anomaly scans were reviewed, among which 207 (5.1%) women were found to have soft markers (SMs). These included 153 (3.7%) isolated SMs, 43 (1.06%) multiple SMs, and 11 (0.2%) SMs with structural abnormalities. The most common SM was renal pyelectasis. Invasive test uptake increased by 25% among pregnancies with isolated markers and by 55% for those with multiple SMs. A significant association was found between isolated short femur and aneuploidy (p = 0.026), and between multiple SMs and aneuploidy (p = 0.039). Soft markers in low-risk couples can lead to unnecessary invasive testing and anxiety. Genetic counseling is important for discussing relevant factors. Invasive testing for aneuploidies should be based on the modified risk, the presence of multiple SMs, or structural anomalies on ultrasonography.
期刊介绍:
Congenital Anomalies is the official English language journal of the Japanese Teratology Society, and publishes original articles in laboratory as well as clinical research in all areas of abnormal development and related fields, from all over the world. Although contributions by members of the teratology societies affiliated with The International Federation of Teratology Societies are given priority, contributions from non-members are welcomed.