前列腺型p -评分在亚洲队列中的首次验证:改善前列腺癌的风险分层

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70026
See-Tong Pang, Po-Hung Lin, Emelie Berglund, Lidi Xu, I-Hung Shao, Kai-Jie Yu, Chin-Hsuan Hsieh, Tzu-Hsuan Chang, Yu Chen, Wen-Hui Weng, Cheng-Keng Chuang
{"title":"前列腺型p -评分在亚洲队列中的首次验证:改善前列腺癌的风险分层","authors":"See-Tong Pang,&nbsp;Po-Hung Lin,&nbsp;Emelie Berglund,&nbsp;Lidi Xu,&nbsp;I-Hung Shao,&nbsp;Kai-Jie Yu,&nbsp;Chin-Hsuan Hsieh,&nbsp;Tzu-Hsuan Chang,&nbsp;Yu Chen,&nbsp;Wen-Hui Weng,&nbsp;Cheng-Keng Chuang","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the prognostic performance of the Prostatype® score (P-score) in the Asian prostate cancer (PCa) cohort and to assess its ability to refine risk stratification compared to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. This study aimed to determine whether the P-score, previously validated in European populations, maintains its predictive accuracy in a genetically and clinically distinct high-risk Asian cohort, where late-stage diagnosis is more common.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 148 PCa patients diagnosed at Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 56 had primary metastases at diagnosis. The P-score was calculated based on gene expression in core needle biopsies and clinical data collected from patients' medical records. The primary endpoint was PCa-specific mortality (PCSM). The secondary endpoints were adverse pathology (AP) and biochemical failure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The P-score significantly outperformed NCCN in predicting PCSM, achieving a higher C-index (0.90 vs. 0.73, P &lt; 0.005), which reflects superior prognostic accuracy. Notably, 19.6% of patients were reclassified into different risk categories compared to NCCN, improving risk stratification and potentially altering treatment decisions for nearly one in five patients. The P-score was also an independent predictor of adverse pathology (P = 0.003, AUC: 0.81) and biochemical failure (P = 0.03, AUC: 0.89).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study validated the P-score for the first time in a non-European population, confirming its predictive power in an Asian high-risk setting. The reclassification of 19.6% of patients suggests that the P-score refines risk stratification beyond NCCN, offering a more precise distinction between favourable and unfavourable outcomes, enabling more informed treatment decisions. These findings highlight the global applicability of the P-score and its potential to improve risk assessment and personalized treatment for PCa patients worldwide.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First validation of the Prostatype® P-score in an Asian cohort: Improving risk stratification for prostate cancer\",\"authors\":\"See-Tong Pang,&nbsp;Po-Hung Lin,&nbsp;Emelie Berglund,&nbsp;Lidi Xu,&nbsp;I-Hung Shao,&nbsp;Kai-Jie Yu,&nbsp;Chin-Hsuan Hsieh,&nbsp;Tzu-Hsuan Chang,&nbsp;Yu Chen,&nbsp;Wen-Hui Weng,&nbsp;Cheng-Keng Chuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the prognostic performance of the Prostatype® score (P-score) in the Asian prostate cancer (PCa) cohort and to assess its ability to refine risk stratification compared to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. This study aimed to determine whether the P-score, previously validated in European populations, maintains its predictive accuracy in a genetically and clinically distinct high-risk Asian cohort, where late-stage diagnosis is more common.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective study included 148 PCa patients diagnosed at Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 56 had primary metastases at diagnosis. The P-score was calculated based on gene expression in core needle biopsies and clinical data collected from patients' medical records. The primary endpoint was PCa-specific mortality (PCSM). The secondary endpoints were adverse pathology (AP) and biochemical failure.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The P-score significantly outperformed NCCN in predicting PCSM, achieving a higher C-index (0.90 vs. 0.73, P &lt; 0.005), which reflects superior prognostic accuracy. Notably, 19.6% of patients were reclassified into different risk categories compared to NCCN, improving risk stratification and potentially altering treatment decisions for nearly one in five patients. The P-score was also an independent predictor of adverse pathology (P = 0.003, AUC: 0.81) and biochemical failure (P = 0.03, AUC: 0.89).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study validated the P-score for the first time in a non-European population, confirming its predictive power in an Asian high-risk setting. The reclassification of 19.6% of patients suggests that the P-score refines risk stratification beyond NCCN, offering a more precise distinction between favourable and unfavourable outcomes, enabling more informed treatment decisions. These findings highlight the global applicability of the P-score and its potential to improve risk assessment and personalized treatment for PCa patients worldwide.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估前列腺类型评分(P-score)在亚洲前列腺癌(PCa)队列中的预后表现,并与国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南进行比较,评估其改进风险分层的能力。本研究旨在确定先前在欧洲人群中验证的P-score是否在遗传和临床不同的高风险亚洲队列中保持其预测准确性,其中晚期诊断更为常见。患者与方法本回顾性研究纳入2012年至2017年在台湾长庚纪念医院诊断的148例PCa患者。其中,56例在诊断时发生原发性转移。p评分是根据核心针活检中的基因表达和从患者医疗记录中收集的临床数据计算的。主要终点是前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)。次要终点是不良病理(AP)和生化失败。结果P-评分在预测PCSM方面明显优于NCCN,达到更高的c -指数(0.90比0.73,P < 0.005),反映出更高的预后准确性。值得注意的是,与NCCN相比,19.6%的患者被重新分类为不同的风险类别,改善了风险分层,并可能改变近五分之一患者的治疗决策。P评分也是不良病理(P = 0.003, AUC: 0.81)和生化失败(P = 0.03, AUC: 0.89)的独立预测因子。本研究首次在非欧洲人群中验证了P-score,证实了其在亚洲高危人群中的预测能力。19.6%的患者重新分类表明,p -评分细化了NCCN以外的风险分层,提供了更精确的有利和不利结果区分,使更明智的治疗决策。这些发现强调了p -评分的全球适用性及其在改善全球PCa患者的风险评估和个性化治疗方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

First validation of the Prostatype® P-score in an Asian cohort: Improving risk stratification for prostate cancer

First validation of the Prostatype® P-score in an Asian cohort: Improving risk stratification for prostate cancer

First validation of the Prostatype® P-score in an Asian cohort: Improving risk stratification for prostate cancer

First validation of the Prostatype® P-score in an Asian cohort: Improving risk stratification for prostate cancer

Objectives

To evaluate the prognostic performance of the Prostatype® score (P-score) in the Asian prostate cancer (PCa) cohort and to assess its ability to refine risk stratification compared to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. This study aimed to determine whether the P-score, previously validated in European populations, maintains its predictive accuracy in a genetically and clinically distinct high-risk Asian cohort, where late-stage diagnosis is more common.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included 148 PCa patients diagnosed at Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 56 had primary metastases at diagnosis. The P-score was calculated based on gene expression in core needle biopsies and clinical data collected from patients' medical records. The primary endpoint was PCa-specific mortality (PCSM). The secondary endpoints were adverse pathology (AP) and biochemical failure.

Results

The P-score significantly outperformed NCCN in predicting PCSM, achieving a higher C-index (0.90 vs. 0.73, P < 0.005), which reflects superior prognostic accuracy. Notably, 19.6% of patients were reclassified into different risk categories compared to NCCN, improving risk stratification and potentially altering treatment decisions for nearly one in five patients. The P-score was also an independent predictor of adverse pathology (P = 0.003, AUC: 0.81) and biochemical failure (P = 0.03, AUC: 0.89).

Conclusions

This study validated the P-score for the first time in a non-European population, confirming its predictive power in an Asian high-risk setting. The reclassification of 19.6% of patients suggests that the P-score refines risk stratification beyond NCCN, offering a more precise distinction between favourable and unfavourable outcomes, enabling more informed treatment decisions. These findings highlight the global applicability of the P-score and its potential to improve risk assessment and personalized treatment for PCa patients worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信