重新审视人均二氧化碳排放量与人均收入之间关系的异质性

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Pinar Deniz, Thanasis Stengos
{"title":"重新审视人均二氧化碳排放量与人均收入之间关系的异质性","authors":"Pinar Deniz,&nbsp;Thanasis Stengos","doi":"10.1002/ep.14585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study applies various methods to deal with sources of potential misspecification in the drivers of CO<sub>2</sub> per capita emissions within an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) framework. The proposed methodologies are as follows: (i) Bayesian model averaging analysis as a remedy for omitted variable bias due to model uncertainty, (ii) convergence club analysis to endogenously classify a large size of panel of countries as a remedy for unobserved heterogeneity, (iii) inclusion of lagged regressors as a remedy for simultaneity. The empirical findings show that the EKC is holding for all except for the first group with the highest (or fastest) long-term income trajectories. Moreover, one observes a clear negative impact of renewable energy consumption, a general positive impact of financial development, and no impact of institutions on emissions. Finally, the findings highlight the importance of constructing homogeneous country clusters.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting heterogeneity in the relationship between CO2 per capita emissions and income per capita\",\"authors\":\"Pinar Deniz,&nbsp;Thanasis Stengos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ep.14585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study applies various methods to deal with sources of potential misspecification in the drivers of CO<sub>2</sub> per capita emissions within an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) framework. The proposed methodologies are as follows: (i) Bayesian model averaging analysis as a remedy for omitted variable bias due to model uncertainty, (ii) convergence club analysis to endogenously classify a large size of panel of countries as a remedy for unobserved heterogeneity, (iii) inclusion of lagged regressors as a remedy for simultaneity. The empirical findings show that the EKC is holding for all except for the first group with the highest (or fastest) long-term income trajectories. Moreover, one observes a clear negative impact of renewable energy consumption, a general positive impact of financial development, and no impact of institutions on emissions. Finally, the findings highlight the importance of constructing homogeneous country clusters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究应用各种方法来处理环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)框架内二氧化碳人均排放驱动因素中潜在的错误规范来源。建议的方法如下:(i)贝叶斯模型平均分析,作为由于模型不确定性而忽略的变量偏差的补救措施;(ii)收敛俱乐部分析,对大量国家小组进行内生分类,作为未观察到的异质性的补救措施;(iii)纳入滞后回归量,作为同时性的补救措施。实证结果表明,除了长期收入轨迹最高(或最快)的第一组之外,EKC对所有人都成立。此外,人们观察到可再生能源消费的明显负面影响,金融发展的总体积极影响,而制度对排放没有影响。最后,研究结果强调了构建同质国家集群的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting heterogeneity in the relationship between CO2 per capita emissions and income per capita

This study applies various methods to deal with sources of potential misspecification in the drivers of CO2 per capita emissions within an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) framework. The proposed methodologies are as follows: (i) Bayesian model averaging analysis as a remedy for omitted variable bias due to model uncertainty, (ii) convergence club analysis to endogenously classify a large size of panel of countries as a remedy for unobserved heterogeneity, (iii) inclusion of lagged regressors as a remedy for simultaneity. The empirical findings show that the EKC is holding for all except for the first group with the highest (or fastest) long-term income trajectories. Moreover, one observes a clear negative impact of renewable energy consumption, a general positive impact of financial development, and no impact of institutions on emissions. Finally, the findings highlight the importance of constructing homogeneous country clusters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信