塑造人类世:理解和评估人类对全球生态系统的影响

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yuanzhao Ding
{"title":"塑造人类世:理解和评估人类对全球生态系统的影响","authors":"Yuanzhao Ding","doi":"10.1002/tqem.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the Anthropocene epoch, human activities have extensively altered the global ecological system, leading to substantial shifts in species distribution and survival patterns due to industrialization and global warming. Quantifying these environmental impacts is essential; for example, the 2023 Global Footprint Network estimates humanity's ecological footprint to be 1.71 Earths, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable solutions. This study aims to identify and summarize primary quantification methods for assessing human impacts on the environment. Using the Web of Science database, this paper analyzes 1000 relevant papers to identify four primary methodologies: the ecological footprint, Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP), the Planetary Boundary framework, and the Living Planet Index (LPI). This paper provides a detailed evaluation of each approach, assessing their strengths and limitations in measuring the effects of human activities on the global ecosystem. Additionally, this study explores the potential of machine learning models to enhance future predictions. By analyzing and comparing these methods, this paper offers insights that are critical for informing policies and practices aimed at reducing human-induced environmental degradation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shaping the Anthropocene: Understanding and Evaluating Human Impact on the Global Ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Yuanzhao Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tqem.70104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the Anthropocene epoch, human activities have extensively altered the global ecological system, leading to substantial shifts in species distribution and survival patterns due to industrialization and global warming. Quantifying these environmental impacts is essential; for example, the 2023 Global Footprint Network estimates humanity's ecological footprint to be 1.71 Earths, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable solutions. This study aims to identify and summarize primary quantification methods for assessing human impacts on the environment. Using the Web of Science database, this paper analyzes 1000 relevant papers to identify four primary methodologies: the ecological footprint, Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP), the Planetary Boundary framework, and the Living Planet Index (LPI). This paper provides a detailed evaluation of each approach, assessing their strengths and limitations in measuring the effects of human activities on the global ecosystem. Additionally, this study explores the potential of machine learning models to enhance future predictions. By analyzing and comparing these methods, this paper offers insights that are critical for informing policies and practices aimed at reducing human-induced environmental degradation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人类世时期,人类活动广泛改变了全球生态系统,由于工业化和全球变暖,导致物种分布和生存模式发生了重大变化。量化这些环境影响至关重要;例如,2023年全球足迹网络估计人类的生态足迹为1.71个地球,强调了对可持续解决方案的迫切需要。本研究旨在确定和总结评估人类对环境影响的主要量化方法。本文利用Web of Science数据库分析了1000篇相关论文,确定了四种主要方法:生态足迹、人类对净初级生产的占用(HANPP)、行星边界框架和地球生命指数(LPI)。本文对每种方法进行了详细的评价,评估了它们在衡量人类活动对全球生态系统影响方面的优势和局限性。此外,本研究还探索了机器学习模型在增强未来预测方面的潜力。通过分析和比较这些方法,本文提供了对旨在减少人为引起的环境退化的政策和实践至关重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shaping the Anthropocene: Understanding and Evaluating Human Impact on the Global Ecosystem

In the Anthropocene epoch, human activities have extensively altered the global ecological system, leading to substantial shifts in species distribution and survival patterns due to industrialization and global warming. Quantifying these environmental impacts is essential; for example, the 2023 Global Footprint Network estimates humanity's ecological footprint to be 1.71 Earths, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable solutions. This study aims to identify and summarize primary quantification methods for assessing human impacts on the environment. Using the Web of Science database, this paper analyzes 1000 relevant papers to identify four primary methodologies: the ecological footprint, Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP), the Planetary Boundary framework, and the Living Planet Index (LPI). This paper provides a detailed evaluation of each approach, assessing their strengths and limitations in measuring the effects of human activities on the global ecosystem. Additionally, this study explores the potential of machine learning models to enhance future predictions. By analyzing and comparing these methods, this paper offers insights that are critical for informing policies and practices aimed at reducing human-induced environmental degradation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信