秘鲁土地改革对全国农业生产力的影响:一项综合控制研究

IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mauricio Espinoza , Javier Escobal
{"title":"秘鲁土地改革对全国农业生产力的影响:一项综合控制研究","authors":"Mauricio Espinoza ,&nbsp;Javier Escobal","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper evaluates the impact of Peru’s collectivist land reform in 1970 on national agricultural productivity. While prior research have shown contrasting impacts of land reform across different settings, few have assessed the productivity consequences of collectivist experiments at the aggregate level. Employing a Synthetic Control Method, we construct a scenario of Peru's productivity trends in the absence of land reform, drawing on data from comparable Latin American countries unaffected by the reform. We estimate the reform's effect by comparing actual productivity series with the counterfactual scenario. Our findings reveal a substantial negative impact, with agricultural productivity remaining about 20 % below the synthetic control between 1969 and 1985. Robustness analyses support the causal interpretation of these effects, as our findings remain consistent across various optimization methods, falsification tests, and alternative donor pools. Importantly, we confirm that our results are not attributable to broader economic trends affecting Peru during the land reform period, as similar impacts were not observed in unaffected sectors. A decomposition analysis attributes the reform's impact to decreases in the overall efficiency of farm production. The shift from individual large landowners to farmer collectives, combined with constraints imposed by an extractive macroeconomic environment, likely disrupted the optimal allocation of resources and technological decision-making within cooperatives, ultimately weakening agricultural Total Factor Productivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 107619"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of Peru’s land reform on national agricultural productivity: A synthetic control study\",\"authors\":\"Mauricio Espinoza ,&nbsp;Javier Escobal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper evaluates the impact of Peru’s collectivist land reform in 1970 on national agricultural productivity. While prior research have shown contrasting impacts of land reform across different settings, few have assessed the productivity consequences of collectivist experiments at the aggregate level. Employing a Synthetic Control Method, we construct a scenario of Peru's productivity trends in the absence of land reform, drawing on data from comparable Latin American countries unaffected by the reform. We estimate the reform's effect by comparing actual productivity series with the counterfactual scenario. Our findings reveal a substantial negative impact, with agricultural productivity remaining about 20 % below the synthetic control between 1969 and 1985. Robustness analyses support the causal interpretation of these effects, as our findings remain consistent across various optimization methods, falsification tests, and alternative donor pools. Importantly, we confirm that our results are not attributable to broader economic trends affecting Peru during the land reform period, as similar impacts were not observed in unaffected sectors. A decomposition analysis attributes the reform's impact to decreases in the overall efficiency of farm production. The shift from individual large landowners to farmer collectives, combined with constraints imposed by an extractive macroeconomic environment, likely disrupted the optimal allocation of resources and technological decision-making within cooperatives, ultimately weakening agricultural Total Factor Productivity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Use Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772500153X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772500153X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评价了1970年秘鲁集体主义土地改革对全国农业生产力的影响。虽然先前的研究显示了土地改革在不同环境下的不同影响,但很少有人在总体水平上评估集体主义实验对生产力的影响。采用综合控制方法,我们利用未受土地改革影响的可比拉美国家的数据,构建了秘鲁在没有土地改革的情况下的生产率趋势情景。我们通过比较实际生产率序列和反事实情景来估计改革的效果。我们的研究结果揭示了实质性的负面影响,在1969年至1985年期间,农业生产力仍然比合成控制低约20% %。稳健性分析支持这些效应的因果解释,因为我们的发现在各种优化方法、证伪检验和替代供体池中保持一致。重要的是,我们确认,我们的结果不能归因于土地改革期间影响秘鲁的更广泛的经济趋势,因为在未受影响的部门没有观察到类似的影响。一项分解分析将改革的影响归因于农业生产整体效率的下降。从个体大土地所有者到农民集体的转变,再加上掠夺性宏观经济环境所施加的限制,可能破坏了合作社内部资源的最佳配置和技术决策,最终削弱了农业全要素生产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of Peru’s land reform on national agricultural productivity: A synthetic control study
This paper evaluates the impact of Peru’s collectivist land reform in 1970 on national agricultural productivity. While prior research have shown contrasting impacts of land reform across different settings, few have assessed the productivity consequences of collectivist experiments at the aggregate level. Employing a Synthetic Control Method, we construct a scenario of Peru's productivity trends in the absence of land reform, drawing on data from comparable Latin American countries unaffected by the reform. We estimate the reform's effect by comparing actual productivity series with the counterfactual scenario. Our findings reveal a substantial negative impact, with agricultural productivity remaining about 20 % below the synthetic control between 1969 and 1985. Robustness analyses support the causal interpretation of these effects, as our findings remain consistent across various optimization methods, falsification tests, and alternative donor pools. Importantly, we confirm that our results are not attributable to broader economic trends affecting Peru during the land reform period, as similar impacts were not observed in unaffected sectors. A decomposition analysis attributes the reform's impact to decreases in the overall efficiency of farm production. The shift from individual large landowners to farmer collectives, combined with constraints imposed by an extractive macroeconomic environment, likely disrupted the optimal allocation of resources and technological decision-making within cooperatives, ultimately weakening agricultural Total Factor Productivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信