Unser Jaffry , Catherine Bienert , Dennis G. Foster , Charalampos Siotos , Michele A. Manahan , Samuel Sarmiento
{"title":"最终乳房重建的时间:对生活质量的影响及相关因素","authors":"Unser Jaffry , Catherine Bienert , Dennis G. Foster , Charalampos Siotos , Michele A. Manahan , Samuel Sarmiento","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.05.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Breast cancer patients often undergo prolonged periods of care due to chemotherapy, radiation, and multiple breast reconstruction procedures. The time to final reconstruction (TTFR) after mastectomy can span years, during which time patients may experience reduced quality of life (QoL). However, the relationship between prolonging this interval and long-term QoL is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed a prospectively collected registry of patients who received breast reconstruction at our institution. We obtained data for patients meeting the following criteria: received breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2015; had at least 12 months of Breast-Q follow-up; and for whom TTFR was available. Patients who received final breast reconstruction on the same day as mastectomy were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 198 female patients. The median time to final reconstruction was 199 days. Women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> experienced the longest interval (936 days; p=0.001). African-American women also experienced greater delays (mean: 527 days; p=0.05). Women undergoing autologous reconstruction experienced a significantly greater delay compared to implant-based or fat grafting (325 days; p=0.02). However, this did not hold in the adjusted model. Compared to staged, women undergoing delayed reconstruction waited the longest (mean: 1269 days; p<0.001). Regarding QoL, a linear regression revealed reductions across all domains per each day of delay in final reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A longer interval between mastectomy and final reconstruction may be associated with decreases in QoL outcomes. Factors including mastectomy type, reconstruction type, and patient demographics may impact this interval. These factors are worth considering when discussing reconstruction options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"106 ","pages":"Pages 203-212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to final breast reconstruction: Effect on quality of life and associated factors\",\"authors\":\"Unser Jaffry , Catherine Bienert , Dennis G. Foster , Charalampos Siotos , Michele A. Manahan , Samuel Sarmiento\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.05.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Breast cancer patients often undergo prolonged periods of care due to chemotherapy, radiation, and multiple breast reconstruction procedures. The time to final reconstruction (TTFR) after mastectomy can span years, during which time patients may experience reduced quality of life (QoL). However, the relationship between prolonging this interval and long-term QoL is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed a prospectively collected registry of patients who received breast reconstruction at our institution. We obtained data for patients meeting the following criteria: received breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2015; had at least 12 months of Breast-Q follow-up; and for whom TTFR was available. Patients who received final breast reconstruction on the same day as mastectomy were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 198 female patients. The median time to final reconstruction was 199 days. Women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> experienced the longest interval (936 days; p=0.001). African-American women also experienced greater delays (mean: 527 days; p=0.05). Women undergoing autologous reconstruction experienced a significantly greater delay compared to implant-based or fat grafting (325 days; p=0.02). However, this did not hold in the adjusted model. Compared to staged, women undergoing delayed reconstruction waited the longest (mean: 1269 days; p<0.001). Regarding QoL, a linear regression revealed reductions across all domains per each day of delay in final reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A longer interval between mastectomy and final reconstruction may be associated with decreases in QoL outcomes. Factors including mastectomy type, reconstruction type, and patient demographics may impact this interval. These factors are worth considering when discussing reconstruction options.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 203-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525003377\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525003377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Time to final breast reconstruction: Effect on quality of life and associated factors
Background
Breast cancer patients often undergo prolonged periods of care due to chemotherapy, radiation, and multiple breast reconstruction procedures. The time to final reconstruction (TTFR) after mastectomy can span years, during which time patients may experience reduced quality of life (QoL). However, the relationship between prolonging this interval and long-term QoL is unclear.
Methods
We analyzed a prospectively collected registry of patients who received breast reconstruction at our institution. We obtained data for patients meeting the following criteria: received breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2015; had at least 12 months of Breast-Q follow-up; and for whom TTFR was available. Patients who received final breast reconstruction on the same day as mastectomy were excluded.
Results
We identified 198 female patients. The median time to final reconstruction was 199 days. Women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m2 experienced the longest interval (936 days; p=0.001). African-American women also experienced greater delays (mean: 527 days; p=0.05). Women undergoing autologous reconstruction experienced a significantly greater delay compared to implant-based or fat grafting (325 days; p=0.02). However, this did not hold in the adjusted model. Compared to staged, women undergoing delayed reconstruction waited the longest (mean: 1269 days; p<0.001). Regarding QoL, a linear regression revealed reductions across all domains per each day of delay in final reconstruction.
Conclusion
A longer interval between mastectomy and final reconstruction may be associated with decreases in QoL outcomes. Factors including mastectomy type, reconstruction type, and patient demographics may impact this interval. These factors are worth considering when discussing reconstruction options.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.