Daniel I. Sessler MD , Sabry Ayad MD , Omer Bakal MD , Nataya S. Disher BS , Jorge Araujo Duran MD , Toby N. Weingarten MD , Albert Dahan MD, PhD , Mark A. Demitrack MD , Jessica Kim MS , Ashish K. Khanna MD, MS , the VOLITION Study Team
{"title":"奥利维定用于术后疼痛和阿片类药物相关并发症:静脉注射奥利维定和阿片类药物相关并发症(VOLITION)前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Daniel I. Sessler MD , Sabry Ayad MD , Omer Bakal MD , Nataya S. Disher BS , Jorge Araujo Duran MD , Toby N. Weingarten MD , Albert Dahan MD, PhD , Mark A. Demitrack MD , Jessica Kim MS , Ashish K. Khanna MD, MS , the VOLITION Study Team","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Oliceridine is a G protein-selective μ-opioid receptor agonist with reduced β-arrestin activation that may produce fewer opioid-related adverse effects (ORAEs) than traditional opioids. The VOLITION prospective cohort study evaluated oliceridine for management of postoperative pain and evaluated ORAEs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 204 patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery. Our primary aim was to quantify the proportion of patients having respiratory compromise over the initial two postoperative days. Cardiorespiratory function was continuously monitored with pulse oximetry, capnography, and plethysmography. Our composite of clinically meaningful respiratory events was defined by an end-tidal (Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 15 mmHg for ≥3 min, respiratory rate ≤ 5 breaths/min for ≥3 min, oxygen saturation ≤ 85 % for ≥3 min, apnea lasting >30 s, or any life-threatening respiratory events. All potential respiratory events were adjudicated by two independent expert reviewers. On an exploratory basis we evaluated the proportion of patients achieving a complete gastrointestinal response (no vomiting and no rescue antiemetic use). Central nervous system compromise was evaluated with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, the Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale, and the 3-min Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 203 patients in the safety population (mean age 57 years, 52 % women; mean duration of surgery: 5 h), 197 patients had cardiorespiratory data available for analysis. The median cumulative oliceridine dose was 33 mg (range 1.5–75 mg). There were 174 adjudicated episodes of respiratory compromise in 45 patients (23 %) but no deaths or oliceridine-related serious adverse events. Naloxone opioid reversal was never required. There were 107 (53 %) patients who had a complete gastrointestinal response, and eight met screening criteria for delirium.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nearly one quarter of patients experienced a respiratory compromise with oliceridine analgesia, none of which was life-threatening. A randomized trial needs to determine whether oliceridine produces fewer overall ORAEs than conventional opioids.</div><div>The study was registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT04979247</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 111870"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oliceridine for postoperative pain and opioid-related complications: The intravenous oliceridine and opioid-related complications (VOLITION) prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel I. Sessler MD , Sabry Ayad MD , Omer Bakal MD , Nataya S. Disher BS , Jorge Araujo Duran MD , Toby N. Weingarten MD , Albert Dahan MD, PhD , Mark A. Demitrack MD , Jessica Kim MS , Ashish K. Khanna MD, MS , the VOLITION Study Team\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Oliceridine is a G protein-selective μ-opioid receptor agonist with reduced β-arrestin activation that may produce fewer opioid-related adverse effects (ORAEs) than traditional opioids. The VOLITION prospective cohort study evaluated oliceridine for management of postoperative pain and evaluated ORAEs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 204 patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery. Our primary aim was to quantify the proportion of patients having respiratory compromise over the initial two postoperative days. Cardiorespiratory function was continuously monitored with pulse oximetry, capnography, and plethysmography. Our composite of clinically meaningful respiratory events was defined by an end-tidal (Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 15 mmHg for ≥3 min, respiratory rate ≤ 5 breaths/min for ≥3 min, oxygen saturation ≤ 85 % for ≥3 min, apnea lasting >30 s, or any life-threatening respiratory events. All potential respiratory events were adjudicated by two independent expert reviewers. On an exploratory basis we evaluated the proportion of patients achieving a complete gastrointestinal response (no vomiting and no rescue antiemetic use). Central nervous system compromise was evaluated with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, the Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale, and the 3-min Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 203 patients in the safety population (mean age 57 years, 52 % women; mean duration of surgery: 5 h), 197 patients had cardiorespiratory data available for analysis. The median cumulative oliceridine dose was 33 mg (range 1.5–75 mg). There were 174 adjudicated episodes of respiratory compromise in 45 patients (23 %) but no deaths or oliceridine-related serious adverse events. Naloxone opioid reversal was never required. There were 107 (53 %) patients who had a complete gastrointestinal response, and eight met screening criteria for delirium.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nearly one quarter of patients experienced a respiratory compromise with oliceridine analgesia, none of which was life-threatening. A randomized trial needs to determine whether oliceridine produces fewer overall ORAEs than conventional opioids.</div><div>The study was registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT04979247</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025001308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025001308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Oliceridine for postoperative pain and opioid-related complications: The intravenous oliceridine and opioid-related complications (VOLITION) prospective cohort study
Background
Oliceridine is a G protein-selective μ-opioid receptor agonist with reduced β-arrestin activation that may produce fewer opioid-related adverse effects (ORAEs) than traditional opioids. The VOLITION prospective cohort study evaluated oliceridine for management of postoperative pain and evaluated ORAEs.
Methods
We enrolled 204 patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery. Our primary aim was to quantify the proportion of patients having respiratory compromise over the initial two postoperative days. Cardiorespiratory function was continuously monitored with pulse oximetry, capnography, and plethysmography. Our composite of clinically meaningful respiratory events was defined by an end-tidal (Et) CO2 ≤ 15 mmHg for ≥3 min, respiratory rate ≤ 5 breaths/min for ≥3 min, oxygen saturation ≤ 85 % for ≥3 min, apnea lasting >30 s, or any life-threatening respiratory events. All potential respiratory events were adjudicated by two independent expert reviewers. On an exploratory basis we evaluated the proportion of patients achieving a complete gastrointestinal response (no vomiting and no rescue antiemetic use). Central nervous system compromise was evaluated with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, the Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale, and the 3-min Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method.
Results
Among 203 patients in the safety population (mean age 57 years, 52 % women; mean duration of surgery: 5 h), 197 patients had cardiorespiratory data available for analysis. The median cumulative oliceridine dose was 33 mg (range 1.5–75 mg). There were 174 adjudicated episodes of respiratory compromise in 45 patients (23 %) but no deaths or oliceridine-related serious adverse events. Naloxone opioid reversal was never required. There were 107 (53 %) patients who had a complete gastrointestinal response, and eight met screening criteria for delirium.
Conclusion
Nearly one quarter of patients experienced a respiratory compromise with oliceridine analgesia, none of which was life-threatening. A randomized trial needs to determine whether oliceridine produces fewer overall ORAEs than conventional opioids.
The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04979247).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.