神经外伤患者颅内出血的进展:孤立性与多区出血的临床和影像学比较及相关输血治疗策略

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cody J. Orton , Samuel A. Tenhoeve , Matthew C. Findlay , Sarah Nguyen , Sarah T. Menacho
{"title":"神经外伤患者颅内出血的进展:孤立性与多区出血的临床和影像学比较及相关输血治疗策略","authors":"Cody J. Orton ,&nbsp;Samuel A. Tenhoeve ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Findlay ,&nbsp;Sarah Nguyen ,&nbsp;Sarah T. Menacho","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The similar presentation of patients with multiple simultaneous (mICHs) or isolated (iICH) intracranial hemorrhages prompted investigation of clinical and radiological ICH progression during hospitalization in these cohorts. We also examined the role of aggressive transfusion and acute interventions on patient morbidity and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult (&gt;18 years) neurotrauma patients treated at our Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2022, with an iICH or mICH were included based on meeting 5 criteria: isolated neurotrauma; ICH injury beyond subarachnoid hemorrhage; repeat head CT available; no anticoagulant usage; and survivable injuries. Data collected retrospectively included demographics, potential risk factors for ICH, injury type, management details, transfusion characteristics, and outcomes. The primary outcome was the clinical and radiological progression of ICH during hospitalization, and the secondary outcome was the role of aggressive transfusion and acute interventions on patient morbidity and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 596 patients, 242 had iICH and 354 had mICH. Other than age (p = .01) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (p &lt; .001), most presentation characteristics, including comorbidities, were similar in the two groups. Although patients with iICH were less likely to have subarachnoid hemorrhage (p &lt; .001), epidural hematoma (p = .03), intraparenchymal hematoma (p &lt; .001), and hemorrhagic contusions (p &lt; .001), subdural hematomas were equally likely to occur in both groups (p = .52). There were no significant differences in neurosurgical treatment by ICH type. There were no significant differences in progression on imaging or transfusions received between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although our data are limited as a single-center retrospective analysis, these results highlight the similarities between patients with iICH and mICH and indicate that treatment may be independent of the number of bleeds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 108984"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progression of intracranial hemorrhages in neurotrauma patients: A clinical and radiological comparison of isolated versus multiple areas of hemorrhage and associated transfusion treatment strategies\",\"authors\":\"Cody J. Orton ,&nbsp;Samuel A. Tenhoeve ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Findlay ,&nbsp;Sarah Nguyen ,&nbsp;Sarah T. Menacho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The similar presentation of patients with multiple simultaneous (mICHs) or isolated (iICH) intracranial hemorrhages prompted investigation of clinical and radiological ICH progression during hospitalization in these cohorts. We also examined the role of aggressive transfusion and acute interventions on patient morbidity and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult (&gt;18 years) neurotrauma patients treated at our Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2022, with an iICH or mICH were included based on meeting 5 criteria: isolated neurotrauma; ICH injury beyond subarachnoid hemorrhage; repeat head CT available; no anticoagulant usage; and survivable injuries. Data collected retrospectively included demographics, potential risk factors for ICH, injury type, management details, transfusion characteristics, and outcomes. The primary outcome was the clinical and radiological progression of ICH during hospitalization, and the secondary outcome was the role of aggressive transfusion and acute interventions on patient morbidity and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 596 patients, 242 had iICH and 354 had mICH. Other than age (p = .01) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (p &lt; .001), most presentation characteristics, including comorbidities, were similar in the two groups. Although patients with iICH were less likely to have subarachnoid hemorrhage (p &lt; .001), epidural hematoma (p = .03), intraparenchymal hematoma (p &lt; .001), and hemorrhagic contusions (p &lt; .001), subdural hematomas were equally likely to occur in both groups (p = .52). There were no significant differences in neurosurgical treatment by ICH type. There were no significant differences in progression on imaging or transfusions received between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although our data are limited as a single-center retrospective analysis, these results highlight the similarities between patients with iICH and mICH and indicate that treatment may be independent of the number of bleeds.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725002677\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725002677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多并发(mICHs)或孤立性(iICH)颅内出血患者的相似表现促使研究这些队列在住院期间颅内出血的临床和放射学进展。我们还研究了积极输血和急性干预对患者发病率和死亡率的作用。方法2002年1月1日至2022年12月31日在我院一级创伤中心治疗的成人(18岁)神经外伤患者,患有iICH或mICH,符合5个标准:孤立性神经外伤;蛛网膜下腔出血以外的脑出血;可重复头部CT;未使用抗凝剂;以及可存活的伤害。回顾性收集的数据包括人口统计学、脑出血的潜在危险因素、损伤类型、管理细节、输血特征和结局。主要结果是住院期间脑出血的临床和放射学进展,次要结果是积极输血和急性干预对患者发病率和死亡率的作用。结果596例患者中,重度脑出血242例,重度脑出血354例。除了年龄(p = .01)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(p <; .001)外,两组患者的大多数表现特征,包括合并症,都相似。尽管iICH不太可能有蛛网膜下腔出血患者(p & lt; 措施),硬膜外血肿(p = .03点),intraparenchymal血肿(p & lt; 措施),和出血性挫伤(p & lt; 措施),硬膜下血肿也同样可能发生在两个组(p = 点)。脑出血类型在神经外科治疗上无显著差异。两组在影像学进展或输血方面无显著差异。结论:虽然我们的数据仅限于单中心回顾性分析,但这些结果突出了iICH和mICH患者之间的相似性,并表明治疗可能与出血数量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progression of intracranial hemorrhages in neurotrauma patients: A clinical and radiological comparison of isolated versus multiple areas of hemorrhage and associated transfusion treatment strategies

Purpose

The similar presentation of patients with multiple simultaneous (mICHs) or isolated (iICH) intracranial hemorrhages prompted investigation of clinical and radiological ICH progression during hospitalization in these cohorts. We also examined the role of aggressive transfusion and acute interventions on patient morbidity and mortality.

Methods

Adult (>18 years) neurotrauma patients treated at our Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2022, with an iICH or mICH were included based on meeting 5 criteria: isolated neurotrauma; ICH injury beyond subarachnoid hemorrhage; repeat head CT available; no anticoagulant usage; and survivable injuries. Data collected retrospectively included demographics, potential risk factors for ICH, injury type, management details, transfusion characteristics, and outcomes. The primary outcome was the clinical and radiological progression of ICH during hospitalization, and the secondary outcome was the role of aggressive transfusion and acute interventions on patient morbidity and mortality.

Results

Among the 596 patients, 242 had iICH and 354 had mICH. Other than age (p = .01) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (p < .001), most presentation characteristics, including comorbidities, were similar in the two groups. Although patients with iICH were less likely to have subarachnoid hemorrhage (p < .001), epidural hematoma (p = .03), intraparenchymal hematoma (p < .001), and hemorrhagic contusions (p < .001), subdural hematomas were equally likely to occur in both groups (p = .52). There were no significant differences in neurosurgical treatment by ICH type. There were no significant differences in progression on imaging or transfusions received between the two groups.

Conclusion

Although our data are limited as a single-center retrospective analysis, these results highlight the similarities between patients with iICH and mICH and indicate that treatment may be independent of the number of bleeds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信