Georgios S. Sioutas, Alan Napole, Bhargavi Budihal, Pierce Davis, Saarang Patel, Oleg Shekhtman, Mohamed M. Salem, Visish M. Srinivasan, Jan Karl Burkhardt
{"title":"颅骨切除术后早期颅骨成形术的最佳时机:3241例患者倾向匹配的国家数据库研究","authors":"Georgios S. Sioutas, Alan Napole, Bhargavi Budihal, Pierce Davis, Saarang Patel, Oleg Shekhtman, Mohamed M. Salem, Visish M. Srinivasan, Jan Karl Burkhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Nearly 30 % of patients experience complications following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. However, the optimal timing for this procedure is not well established.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare complication rates for cranioplasty performed at different early monthly intervals after craniectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the TriNetX Research Network, we included patients who underwent either late cranioplasty (91 days-1 year), or cranioplasty in the first, second, or third month after craniectomy. Propensity score matching was used to match the late cranioplasty group separately with the other three cranioplasty groups based on baseline characteristics in the whole cohort and in a TBI-specific subgroup. Postoperative outcomes were assessed at 6 months after cranioplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 3241 patients. After matching, 375 patients remained in the first-month, 365 in the second month, and 434 in the third-month group. Compared to late cranioplasty, ICH as a post-operative outcome was significantly more common in the first-month cranioplasty (p = 0.037) and second-month cranioplasty (p = 0.042) groups, while SDH as a post-operative outcome was more frequent in all early cranioplasty groups (p < 0.01). The need for repeat cranioplasty was higher in the first month (p = 0.002) and second month (p = 0.031) groups. Repeat Craniectomy/Craniotomy and CSF leak were more common in the first-month group (p = 0.006 and 0.001, respectively). Mortality was higher in the first month (RR=2.9, 95 %CI:1.5–5.5, p = 0.001) cranioplasty group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cranioplasty within 2 months after craniectomy was associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially for patients without TBI. Prospective studies are needed to establish the best timing for cranioplasty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 108989"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal timing for early cranioplasty following craniectomy: A propensity-matched national database study of 3241 patients\",\"authors\":\"Georgios S. Sioutas, Alan Napole, Bhargavi Budihal, Pierce Davis, Saarang Patel, Oleg Shekhtman, Mohamed M. Salem, Visish M. Srinivasan, Jan Karl Burkhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Nearly 30 % of patients experience complications following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. However, the optimal timing for this procedure is not well established.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare complication rates for cranioplasty performed at different early monthly intervals after craniectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the TriNetX Research Network, we included patients who underwent either late cranioplasty (91 days-1 year), or cranioplasty in the first, second, or third month after craniectomy. Propensity score matching was used to match the late cranioplasty group separately with the other three cranioplasty groups based on baseline characteristics in the whole cohort and in a TBI-specific subgroup. Postoperative outcomes were assessed at 6 months after cranioplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 3241 patients. After matching, 375 patients remained in the first-month, 365 in the second month, and 434 in the third-month group. Compared to late cranioplasty, ICH as a post-operative outcome was significantly more common in the first-month cranioplasty (p = 0.037) and second-month cranioplasty (p = 0.042) groups, while SDH as a post-operative outcome was more frequent in all early cranioplasty groups (p < 0.01). The need for repeat cranioplasty was higher in the first month (p = 0.002) and second month (p = 0.031) groups. Repeat Craniectomy/Craniotomy and CSF leak were more common in the first-month group (p = 0.006 and 0.001, respectively). Mortality was higher in the first month (RR=2.9, 95 %CI:1.5–5.5, p = 0.001) cranioplasty group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cranioplasty within 2 months after craniectomy was associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially for patients without TBI. Prospective studies are needed to establish the best timing for cranioplasty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725002720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725002720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal timing for early cranioplasty following craniectomy: A propensity-matched national database study of 3241 patients
Introduction
Nearly 30 % of patients experience complications following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. However, the optimal timing for this procedure is not well established.
Objective
To compare complication rates for cranioplasty performed at different early monthly intervals after craniectomy.
Methods
Using the TriNetX Research Network, we included patients who underwent either late cranioplasty (91 days-1 year), or cranioplasty in the first, second, or third month after craniectomy. Propensity score matching was used to match the late cranioplasty group separately with the other three cranioplasty groups based on baseline characteristics in the whole cohort and in a TBI-specific subgroup. Postoperative outcomes were assessed at 6 months after cranioplasty.
Results
We analyzed 3241 patients. After matching, 375 patients remained in the first-month, 365 in the second month, and 434 in the third-month group. Compared to late cranioplasty, ICH as a post-operative outcome was significantly more common in the first-month cranioplasty (p = 0.037) and second-month cranioplasty (p = 0.042) groups, while SDH as a post-operative outcome was more frequent in all early cranioplasty groups (p < 0.01). The need for repeat cranioplasty was higher in the first month (p = 0.002) and second month (p = 0.031) groups. Repeat Craniectomy/Craniotomy and CSF leak were more common in the first-month group (p = 0.006 and 0.001, respectively). Mortality was higher in the first month (RR=2.9, 95 %CI:1.5–5.5, p = 0.001) cranioplasty group.
Conclusion
Cranioplasty within 2 months after craniectomy was associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially for patients without TBI. Prospective studies are needed to establish the best timing for cranioplasty.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.