{"title":"审慎政策的底线在哪里?对银行业稳定性和风险承受能力的见解","authors":"Petr Jakubik , Bogdan Gabriel Moinescu","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study estimates the natural rate of bank defaults, the threshold below which systemic banking crises are unlikely, using a threshold model based on bank default rates and macroeconomic indicators. Analyzing global data from major crises over the past 40 years, we identify a critical default rate of 0.25 %, equivalent to one default per 400 banks annually. Aligned with a 'BBB' rating, this benchmark supports the calibration of supervisory risk tolerance frameworks. Moreover, the study provides a replicable, data-driven approach to prudential policy design, linking acceptable bank failure frequency to key macroeconomic variables, especially inflation indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 107609"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where to draw the line in prudential policy? Insights into banking stability and risk tolerance\",\"authors\":\"Petr Jakubik , Bogdan Gabriel Moinescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study estimates the natural rate of bank defaults, the threshold below which systemic banking crises are unlikely, using a threshold model based on bank default rates and macroeconomic indicators. Analyzing global data from major crises over the past 40 years, we identify a critical default rate of 0.25 %, equivalent to one default per 400 banks annually. Aligned with a 'BBB' rating, this benchmark supports the calibration of supervisory risk tolerance frameworks. Moreover, the study provides a replicable, data-driven approach to prudential policy design, linking acceptable bank failure frequency to key macroeconomic variables, especially inflation indicators.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107609\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325008682\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325008682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where to draw the line in prudential policy? Insights into banking stability and risk tolerance
This study estimates the natural rate of bank defaults, the threshold below which systemic banking crises are unlikely, using a threshold model based on bank default rates and macroeconomic indicators. Analyzing global data from major crises over the past 40 years, we identify a critical default rate of 0.25 %, equivalent to one default per 400 banks annually. Aligned with a 'BBB' rating, this benchmark supports the calibration of supervisory risk tolerance frameworks. Moreover, the study provides a replicable, data-driven approach to prudential policy design, linking acceptable bank failure frequency to key macroeconomic variables, especially inflation indicators.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance