人工智能支持下血管肉瘤中PD-L1表达评估改善

Q2 Medicine
F.H. Reith , A. Jarosch , J.P. Albrecht , F. Ghoreschi , A. Flörcken , A. Dörr , S. Roohani , F.M. Schäfer , R. Öllinger , S. Märdian , K. Tielking , P. Bischoff , N. Frühauf , F. Brandes , D. Horst , C. Sers , D. Kainmüller
{"title":"人工智能支持下血管肉瘤中PD-L1表达评估改善","authors":"F.H. Reith ,&nbsp;A. Jarosch ,&nbsp;J.P. Albrecht ,&nbsp;F. Ghoreschi ,&nbsp;A. Flörcken ,&nbsp;A. Dörr ,&nbsp;S. Roohani ,&nbsp;F.M. Schäfer ,&nbsp;R. Öllinger ,&nbsp;S. Märdian ,&nbsp;K. Tielking ,&nbsp;P. Bischoff ,&nbsp;N. Frühauf ,&nbsp;F. Brandes ,&nbsp;D. Horst ,&nbsp;C. Sers ,&nbsp;D. Kainmüller","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tumoral PD-L1 expression is assessed to weigh immunotherapy options in the treatment of various types of cancer. To determine PD-L1 expression, each tumor cell needs to be assessed to calculate the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells, called tumor proportion score (TPS). Pathologists cannot evaluate each cell individually due to time constraints and thus need to approximate TPS, which has been shown to result in low concordance rates.</div><div>Decision quality could be improved by an AI-based TPS prediction tool which serves as a “second opinion”. Establishing such a tool requires a certain amount of training data, which manifests a bottleneck for rare cancer types such as Angiosarcoma.</div><div>To address this challenge, we developed and open sourced a pipeline that leverages pre-trained and generalist models to achieve strong TPS prediction performance on limited data. Pathologists were asked to reassess patients for which their TPS strongly disagreed with the AI's prediction. In many of these cases, pathologists updated their TPS score, improving their assessment, thus demonstrating the technical feasibility and practical value of AI-based TPS scoring assistance for rare cancers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PD-L1 expression assessment in Angiosarcoma improves with artificial intelligence support\",\"authors\":\"F.H. Reith ,&nbsp;A. Jarosch ,&nbsp;J.P. Albrecht ,&nbsp;F. Ghoreschi ,&nbsp;A. Flörcken ,&nbsp;A. Dörr ,&nbsp;S. Roohani ,&nbsp;F.M. Schäfer ,&nbsp;R. Öllinger ,&nbsp;S. Märdian ,&nbsp;K. Tielking ,&nbsp;P. Bischoff ,&nbsp;N. Frühauf ,&nbsp;F. Brandes ,&nbsp;D. Horst ,&nbsp;C. Sers ,&nbsp;D. Kainmüller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tumoral PD-L1 expression is assessed to weigh immunotherapy options in the treatment of various types of cancer. To determine PD-L1 expression, each tumor cell needs to be assessed to calculate the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells, called tumor proportion score (TPS). Pathologists cannot evaluate each cell individually due to time constraints and thus need to approximate TPS, which has been shown to result in low concordance rates.</div><div>Decision quality could be improved by an AI-based TPS prediction tool which serves as a “second opinion”. Establishing such a tool requires a certain amount of training data, which manifests a bottleneck for rare cancer types such as Angiosarcoma.</div><div>To address this challenge, we developed and open sourced a pipeline that leverages pre-trained and generalist models to achieve strong TPS prediction performance on limited data. Pathologists were asked to reassess patients for which their TPS strongly disagreed with the AI's prediction. In many of these cases, pathologists updated their TPS score, improving their assessment, thus demonstrating the technical feasibility and practical value of AI-based TPS scoring assistance for rare cancers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392500032X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392500032X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估肿瘤PD-L1表达以权衡各种类型癌症治疗中的免疫治疗选择。为了确定PD-L1的表达,需要对每个肿瘤细胞进行评估,计算PD-L1阳性肿瘤细胞的百分比,称为肿瘤比例评分(tumor proportion score, TPS)。由于时间限制,病理学家不能单独评估每个细胞,因此需要近似TPS,这已被证明会导致低一致性率。基于人工智能的TPS预测工具可以作为“第二意见”来提高决策质量。建立这样的工具需要一定的训练数据,这对于血管肉瘤等罕见的癌症类型来说是一个瓶颈。为了应对这一挑战,我们开发并开源了一个管道,利用预训练和通用模型,在有限的数据上实现强大的TPS预测性能。病理学家被要求重新评估他们的TPS与人工智能预测强烈不一致的患者。在许多病例中,病理学家更新了他们的TPS评分,改进了他们的评估,从而证明了基于人工智能的TPS评分辅助罕见癌症的技术可行性和实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PD-L1 expression assessment in Angiosarcoma improves with artificial intelligence support
Tumoral PD-L1 expression is assessed to weigh immunotherapy options in the treatment of various types of cancer. To determine PD-L1 expression, each tumor cell needs to be assessed to calculate the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells, called tumor proportion score (TPS). Pathologists cannot evaluate each cell individually due to time constraints and thus need to approximate TPS, which has been shown to result in low concordance rates.
Decision quality could be improved by an AI-based TPS prediction tool which serves as a “second opinion”. Establishing such a tool requires a certain amount of training data, which manifests a bottleneck for rare cancer types such as Angiosarcoma.
To address this challenge, we developed and open sourced a pipeline that leverages pre-trained and generalist models to achieve strong TPS prediction performance on limited data. Pathologists were asked to reassess patients for which their TPS strongly disagreed with the AI's prediction. In many of these cases, pathologists updated their TPS score, improving their assessment, thus demonstrating the technical feasibility and practical value of AI-based TPS scoring assistance for rare cancers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信