F.H. Reith , A. Jarosch , J.P. Albrecht , F. Ghoreschi , A. Flörcken , A. Dörr , S. Roohani , F.M. Schäfer , R. Öllinger , S. Märdian , K. Tielking , P. Bischoff , N. Frühauf , F. Brandes , D. Horst , C. Sers , D. Kainmüller
{"title":"人工智能支持下血管肉瘤中PD-L1表达评估改善","authors":"F.H. Reith , A. Jarosch , J.P. Albrecht , F. Ghoreschi , A. Flörcken , A. Dörr , S. Roohani , F.M. Schäfer , R. Öllinger , S. Märdian , K. Tielking , P. Bischoff , N. Frühauf , F. Brandes , D. Horst , C. Sers , D. Kainmüller","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tumoral PD-L1 expression is assessed to weigh immunotherapy options in the treatment of various types of cancer. To determine PD-L1 expression, each tumor cell needs to be assessed to calculate the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells, called tumor proportion score (TPS). Pathologists cannot evaluate each cell individually due to time constraints and thus need to approximate TPS, which has been shown to result in low concordance rates.</div><div>Decision quality could be improved by an AI-based TPS prediction tool which serves as a “second opinion”. Establishing such a tool requires a certain amount of training data, which manifests a bottleneck for rare cancer types such as Angiosarcoma.</div><div>To address this challenge, we developed and open sourced a pipeline that leverages pre-trained and generalist models to achieve strong TPS prediction performance on limited data. Pathologists were asked to reassess patients for which their TPS strongly disagreed with the AI's prediction. In many of these cases, pathologists updated their TPS score, improving their assessment, thus demonstrating the technical feasibility and practical value of AI-based TPS scoring assistance for rare cancers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PD-L1 expression assessment in Angiosarcoma improves with artificial intelligence support\",\"authors\":\"F.H. Reith , A. Jarosch , J.P. Albrecht , F. Ghoreschi , A. Flörcken , A. Dörr , S. Roohani , F.M. Schäfer , R. Öllinger , S. Märdian , K. Tielking , P. Bischoff , N. Frühauf , F. Brandes , D. Horst , C. Sers , D. Kainmüller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tumoral PD-L1 expression is assessed to weigh immunotherapy options in the treatment of various types of cancer. To determine PD-L1 expression, each tumor cell needs to be assessed to calculate the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells, called tumor proportion score (TPS). Pathologists cannot evaluate each cell individually due to time constraints and thus need to approximate TPS, which has been shown to result in low concordance rates.</div><div>Decision quality could be improved by an AI-based TPS prediction tool which serves as a “second opinion”. Establishing such a tool requires a certain amount of training data, which manifests a bottleneck for rare cancer types such as Angiosarcoma.</div><div>To address this challenge, we developed and open sourced a pipeline that leverages pre-trained and generalist models to achieve strong TPS prediction performance on limited data. Pathologists were asked to reassess patients for which their TPS strongly disagreed with the AI's prediction. In many of these cases, pathologists updated their TPS score, improving their assessment, thus demonstrating the technical feasibility and practical value of AI-based TPS scoring assistance for rare cancers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392500032X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392500032X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
PD-L1 expression assessment in Angiosarcoma improves with artificial intelligence support
Tumoral PD-L1 expression is assessed to weigh immunotherapy options in the treatment of various types of cancer. To determine PD-L1 expression, each tumor cell needs to be assessed to calculate the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells, called tumor proportion score (TPS). Pathologists cannot evaluate each cell individually due to time constraints and thus need to approximate TPS, which has been shown to result in low concordance rates.
Decision quality could be improved by an AI-based TPS prediction tool which serves as a “second opinion”. Establishing such a tool requires a certain amount of training data, which manifests a bottleneck for rare cancer types such as Angiosarcoma.
To address this challenge, we developed and open sourced a pipeline that leverages pre-trained and generalist models to achieve strong TPS prediction performance on limited data. Pathologists were asked to reassess patients for which their TPS strongly disagreed with the AI's prediction. In many of these cases, pathologists updated their TPS score, improving their assessment, thus demonstrating the technical feasibility and practical value of AI-based TPS scoring assistance for rare cancers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.