这只是一个指尖!然而,争议存在:标准化的治疗途径儿科指尖损伤。

Hilton P Gottschalk, Niamh D McMahon, Karen Piper, Karla Lawson, Andrea Bauer, Sonia Chaundhry, Julie Samora, Krister Freese, Christine A Ho
{"title":"这只是一个指尖!然而,争议存在:标准化的治疗途径儿科指尖损伤。","authors":"Hilton P Gottschalk, Niamh D McMahon, Karen Piper, Karla Lawson, Andrea Bauer, Sonia Chaundhry, Julie Samora, Krister Freese, Christine A Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric fingertip injuries are very common; however, treatment varies greatly depending on geographic location and surgeon. A paucity of data exists on how emergency department practitioners and hand surgeons should treat these injuries. We sought to develop consensus around treatment guidelines for these injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a Delphi survey of self-identified pediatric hand surgeons. Participants answered care delivery questions about 11 scenarios of fingertip injuries. These included minor (e.g., <50% subungual hematomas without fractures) to severe injuries (e.g., complete to near-complete partial tip amputations). Each question was answered on a 3-point Likert scale and included inquiry about antibiotic use, clinical consults, treatment methods, and need for hand surgeon follow-up. The second round of Delphi asked the participants to view round-one responses and reanswer questions that had moderate kappa values (kappa = 0.40-0.69) to attempt to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four surgeons took the first round of Delphi survey. Questions in each scenario ranged from very high to very poor levels of agreement. All but one scenario contained at least one question with moderate agreement allowing for resurvey and consensus building. Thirty-three (97%) of the same surgeons completed the second round. In the 11 scenarios, there were 22 questions resurveyed. Of those 22 questions, 17 (77%) changed to higher levels of consensus with a kappa ≥0.70, allowing consensus of expert opinion to be reached on 45 treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The panel reached consensus on when to use intravenous (IV), oral (PO) or no antibiotics for various scenarios of pediatric fingertip injuries. Clarification was achieved on the standard treatment and follow-up practices for multiple clinical scenarios. Further work is required to achieve expert consensus for management of multiple clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Key concepts: </strong>(1)Fingertip traumas are commonly seen in pediatric emergency rooms with treatments varying widely depending on the region of care.(2)Oral (PO) antibiotics are recommended for a tuft fracture with nailbed displacement, a Seymour fracture, or during partial amputation without loss of vascularity, whereas IV and PO antibiotics are indicated for complete and near-complete amputation.(3)Hand surgeon consultation was recommended for Seymour fracture, partial amputation of the distal phalanx, and complete or near-complete amputation with loss of vascularity.(4)Further research needs to be done to achieve consensus on treatment of some traumas.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>V, Expert Opinion.</p>","PeriodicalId":520850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","volume":"11 ","pages":"100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It's Just a Fingertip! Yet Controversy Exists: Standardizing a Treatment Pathway for Pediatric Fingertip Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Hilton P Gottschalk, Niamh D McMahon, Karen Piper, Karla Lawson, Andrea Bauer, Sonia Chaundhry, Julie Samora, Krister Freese, Christine A Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric fingertip injuries are very common; however, treatment varies greatly depending on geographic location and surgeon. A paucity of data exists on how emergency department practitioners and hand surgeons should treat these injuries. We sought to develop consensus around treatment guidelines for these injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a Delphi survey of self-identified pediatric hand surgeons. Participants answered care delivery questions about 11 scenarios of fingertip injuries. These included minor (e.g., <50% subungual hematomas without fractures) to severe injuries (e.g., complete to near-complete partial tip amputations). Each question was answered on a 3-point Likert scale and included inquiry about antibiotic use, clinical consults, treatment methods, and need for hand surgeon follow-up. The second round of Delphi asked the participants to view round-one responses and reanswer questions that had moderate kappa values (kappa = 0.40-0.69) to attempt to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four surgeons took the first round of Delphi survey. Questions in each scenario ranged from very high to very poor levels of agreement. All but one scenario contained at least one question with moderate agreement allowing for resurvey and consensus building. Thirty-three (97%) of the same surgeons completed the second round. In the 11 scenarios, there were 22 questions resurveyed. Of those 22 questions, 17 (77%) changed to higher levels of consensus with a kappa ≥0.70, allowing consensus of expert opinion to be reached on 45 treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The panel reached consensus on when to use intravenous (IV), oral (PO) or no antibiotics for various scenarios of pediatric fingertip injuries. Clarification was achieved on the standard treatment and follow-up practices for multiple clinical scenarios. Further work is required to achieve expert consensus for management of multiple clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Key concepts: </strong>(1)Fingertip traumas are commonly seen in pediatric emergency rooms with treatments varying widely depending on the region of care.(2)Oral (PO) antibiotics are recommended for a tuft fracture with nailbed displacement, a Seymour fracture, or during partial amputation without loss of vascularity, whereas IV and PO antibiotics are indicated for complete and near-complete amputation.(3)Hand surgeon consultation was recommended for Seymour fracture, partial amputation of the distal phalanx, and complete or near-complete amputation with loss of vascularity.(4)Further research needs to be done to achieve consensus on treatment of some traumas.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>V, Expert Opinion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"100163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小儿指尖损伤非常常见;然而,治疗方法因地理位置和外科医生的不同而有很大差异。缺乏关于急诊科医生和手外科医生应该如何治疗这些损伤的数据。我们试图就这些损伤的治疗指南达成共识。方法:对自认小儿手外科医师进行德尔菲调查。参与者回答了关于11种指尖受伤情况的护理问题。结果:34名外科医生接受了第一轮德尔菲调查。每个场景中的问题从非常高到非常差的一致程度不等。除了一个方案外,所有方案都包含至少一个问题,这些问题具有适度的一致性,允许重新调查和建立共识。33名(97%)外科医生完成了第二轮手术。在11个场景中,有22个问题被重新调查。在这22个问题中,17个(77%)改变为kappa≥0.70的更高水平的共识,允许在45种治疗方法上达成专家意见的共识。结论:专家组就儿科指尖损伤的各种情况下何时使用静脉(IV)、口服(PO)或不使用抗生素达成共识。对多种临床情况的标准治疗和随访实践进行了澄清。需要进一步的工作来达成专家对多种临床情况管理的共识。关键概念:(1)指尖创伤常见于儿科急诊室,治疗方法因护理区域的不同而有很大差异。(2)对于束状骨折伴钉状移位、西摩骨折或部分截肢时无血管丧失,推荐口服(PO)抗生素,而静脉注射和PO抗生素适用于完全和接近完全截肢。(3)对于西摩骨折、远端指骨部分截肢,推荐手外科咨询。(4)一些创伤的治疗方法需要进一步的研究来达成共识。证据等级:V,专家意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
It's Just a Fingertip! Yet Controversy Exists: Standardizing a Treatment Pathway for Pediatric Fingertip Injuries.

Background: Pediatric fingertip injuries are very common; however, treatment varies greatly depending on geographic location and surgeon. A paucity of data exists on how emergency department practitioners and hand surgeons should treat these injuries. We sought to develop consensus around treatment guidelines for these injuries.

Methods: We conducted a Delphi survey of self-identified pediatric hand surgeons. Participants answered care delivery questions about 11 scenarios of fingertip injuries. These included minor (e.g., <50% subungual hematomas without fractures) to severe injuries (e.g., complete to near-complete partial tip amputations). Each question was answered on a 3-point Likert scale and included inquiry about antibiotic use, clinical consults, treatment methods, and need for hand surgeon follow-up. The second round of Delphi asked the participants to view round-one responses and reanswer questions that had moderate kappa values (kappa = 0.40-0.69) to attempt to reach consensus.

Results: Thirty-four surgeons took the first round of Delphi survey. Questions in each scenario ranged from very high to very poor levels of agreement. All but one scenario contained at least one question with moderate agreement allowing for resurvey and consensus building. Thirty-three (97%) of the same surgeons completed the second round. In the 11 scenarios, there were 22 questions resurveyed. Of those 22 questions, 17 (77%) changed to higher levels of consensus with a kappa ≥0.70, allowing consensus of expert opinion to be reached on 45 treatments.

Conclusions: The panel reached consensus on when to use intravenous (IV), oral (PO) or no antibiotics for various scenarios of pediatric fingertip injuries. Clarification was achieved on the standard treatment and follow-up practices for multiple clinical scenarios. Further work is required to achieve expert consensus for management of multiple clinical scenarios.

Key concepts: (1)Fingertip traumas are commonly seen in pediatric emergency rooms with treatments varying widely depending on the region of care.(2)Oral (PO) antibiotics are recommended for a tuft fracture with nailbed displacement, a Seymour fracture, or during partial amputation without loss of vascularity, whereas IV and PO antibiotics are indicated for complete and near-complete amputation.(3)Hand surgeon consultation was recommended for Seymour fracture, partial amputation of the distal phalanx, and complete or near-complete amputation with loss of vascularity.(4)Further research needs to be done to achieve consensus on treatment of some traumas.

Level of evidence: V, Expert Opinion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信