Jeny A Marín-Corte, Alfredo Atl Castillo-Sigales, Hilda Fragoso-Loyo, Erik Cimé-Aké
{"title":"预测狼疮性肾炎患者肾脏复发的HALP评分:一项巢式病例对照研究。","authors":"Jeny A Marín-Corte, Alfredo Atl Castillo-Sigales, Hilda Fragoso-Loyo, Erik Cimé-Aké","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the HALP (hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet) score at lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis in predicting renal relapse (RR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nested case-control study, including patients aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of LN between 2010 and 2022. Two patient sets were included: training and validation. Each set had 2 groups of patients: RR and non-RR. Data were obtained from clinical records. The optimal cutoff value of the HALP score at LN diagnosis was established to predict RR. Cox regression analysis was used to associate HALP score at diagnosis with RR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 53 LN patients in the training set and 74 LN patients in the validation set. The optimal cutoff value for HALP score at diagnosis was 23.5, with an area under the curve of 0.896, sensitivity of 91.9%, and specificity of 97.3% in the validation set. The median age of patients in this set was 31.0 years, mostly female (93%). In the validation set, LN patients with HALP score at diagnosis ≤23.5 compared with higher HALP score subjects showed a significantly higher baseline SLEDAI-2K (18 [interquartile range {IQR}, 14-20] vs. 14 [IQR, 11-17], p < 0.001), Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index at the end of the follow-up (1 [IQR, 0-4] vs. 0 [IQR, 0-1], p = 0.002), chronicity index in renal biopsy (2 [IQR, 1-4] vs. 1 [IQR, 1-2], p = 0.030), and significantly reduced time to RR (4.2 vs. 12.9 years, p < 0.001). A HALP score at diagnosis ≤23.5 was associated with RR (hazard ratio, 18.2; 95% confidence interval, 5.3-30.1; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A HALP score ≤23.5 at LN diagnosis was an independent risk factor for RR.</p>","PeriodicalId":520664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HALP Score for Predicting Renal Relapse in Lupus Nephritis: A Nested Case-Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jeny A Marín-Corte, Alfredo Atl Castillo-Sigales, Hilda Fragoso-Loyo, Erik Cimé-Aké\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the HALP (hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet) score at lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis in predicting renal relapse (RR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nested case-control study, including patients aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of LN between 2010 and 2022. Two patient sets were included: training and validation. Each set had 2 groups of patients: RR and non-RR. Data were obtained from clinical records. The optimal cutoff value of the HALP score at LN diagnosis was established to predict RR. Cox regression analysis was used to associate HALP score at diagnosis with RR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 53 LN patients in the training set and 74 LN patients in the validation set. The optimal cutoff value for HALP score at diagnosis was 23.5, with an area under the curve of 0.896, sensitivity of 91.9%, and specificity of 97.3% in the validation set. The median age of patients in this set was 31.0 years, mostly female (93%). In the validation set, LN patients with HALP score at diagnosis ≤23.5 compared with higher HALP score subjects showed a significantly higher baseline SLEDAI-2K (18 [interquartile range {IQR}, 14-20] vs. 14 [IQR, 11-17], p < 0.001), Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index at the end of the follow-up (1 [IQR, 0-4] vs. 0 [IQR, 0-1], p = 0.002), chronicity index in renal biopsy (2 [IQR, 1-4] vs. 1 [IQR, 1-2], p = 0.030), and significantly reduced time to RR (4.2 vs. 12.9 years, p < 0.001). A HALP score at diagnosis ≤23.5 was associated with RR (hazard ratio, 18.2; 95% confidence interval, 5.3-30.1; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A HALP score ≤23.5 at LN diagnosis was an independent risk factor for RR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价狼疮性肾炎(LN)诊断时血红蛋白-白蛋白-淋巴细胞-血小板(HALP)评分对肾脏复发(RR)的预测价值。方法:巢式病例对照研究,纳入2010 - 2022年年龄≥18岁诊断为LN的患者。包括两组患者:训练组和验证组。每组有两组患者:RR和非RR。数据来源于临床记录。建立了LN诊断时HALP评分的最佳临界值来预测RR。采用Cox回归分析将诊断时的HALP评分与RR相关联。结果:我们将53例LN患者纳入训练集,74例LN患者纳入验证集。诊断时HALP评分的最佳截断值为23.5,曲线下面积为0.896,验证集的敏感性为91.9%,特异性为97.3%。本组患者的中位年龄为31.0岁,以女性为主(93%)。在验证集中,诊断时HALP评分≤23.5的LN患者与HALP评分较高的患者相比,基线sledaii - 2k(18[四分位数范围{IQR}, 14-20]对14 [IQR, 11-17], p < 0.001),系统性狼疮合作诊所/美国风湿病学会随访结束时损伤指数(1 [IQR, 0-4]对0 [IQR, 0-1], p = 0.002),肾活检慢性指数(2 [IQR, 1-4]对1 [IQR, 1-2], p = 0.030)。显著缩短RR时间(4.2年vs 12.9年,p < 0.001)。诊断时HALP评分≤23.5与RR相关(风险比18.2;95%置信区间为5.3-30.1;P < 0.001)。结论:LN诊断时HALP评分≤23.5是发生RR的独立危险因素。
HALP Score for Predicting Renal Relapse in Lupus Nephritis: A Nested Case-Control Study.
Objective: To evaluate the HALP (hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet) score at lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis in predicting renal relapse (RR).
Methods: Nested case-control study, including patients aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of LN between 2010 and 2022. Two patient sets were included: training and validation. Each set had 2 groups of patients: RR and non-RR. Data were obtained from clinical records. The optimal cutoff value of the HALP score at LN diagnosis was established to predict RR. Cox regression analysis was used to associate HALP score at diagnosis with RR.
Results: We included 53 LN patients in the training set and 74 LN patients in the validation set. The optimal cutoff value for HALP score at diagnosis was 23.5, with an area under the curve of 0.896, sensitivity of 91.9%, and specificity of 97.3% in the validation set. The median age of patients in this set was 31.0 years, mostly female (93%). In the validation set, LN patients with HALP score at diagnosis ≤23.5 compared with higher HALP score subjects showed a significantly higher baseline SLEDAI-2K (18 [interquartile range {IQR}, 14-20] vs. 14 [IQR, 11-17], p < 0.001), Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index at the end of the follow-up (1 [IQR, 0-4] vs. 0 [IQR, 0-1], p = 0.002), chronicity index in renal biopsy (2 [IQR, 1-4] vs. 1 [IQR, 1-2], p = 0.030), and significantly reduced time to RR (4.2 vs. 12.9 years, p < 0.001). A HALP score at diagnosis ≤23.5 was associated with RR (hazard ratio, 18.2; 95% confidence interval, 5.3-30.1; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: A HALP score ≤23.5 at LN diagnosis was an independent risk factor for RR.